PensPlz
Registered User
And then they trade you to NY lol
Well I could only pick 10
And then they trade you to NY lol
Canadian population is highly concentrated, probably more than the United States. About a 3rd of Canada's population is in Southern Ontario. and over half is located if you combined the Lower Mainland, Southern Ontario and Montreal and it's suburbs. There are pretty obvious reasons on why violent crimes are higher in the United States, and it's the ease of access to firearms.
Nah dude you're missing the point, this is your chance to take dogwhistle shots at Canada and the coastal regions.I would play anywhere. They're paying me right?
Again, you said the population isn't concentrated. Canada's overall population is highly concentrated. About 90% of Canada's population lives with 100km of the American border. 1/3rd of it's population is in Southern Ontario. To say Canada's lack of crime is due to not having densly populated areas compared to the United States is just ill-informed. Hell, the highest rate of crime by region in the United States is the Southern United States which is much less densly populated than Eastern Seaboard or Southern California.Laying out entire provinces and adding some together isn't what I would call “concentrated”.
The combined population of just Los Angeles and New York city and suburbs make up right around the entirety of Canada’s entire population. Almost 3 times the population of Toronto alone.
In the US, about 1.5% of the population is involved in a violent crime. Not just gun related but in totality. Is there a problem with gun access? Yes. But to live in fear because of it like media protrays you should or your countries media does, is comical at best.
Like I said earlier, the minuscule chance something horrific happens to one of these NHL players does not outweigh the other benefits that the US provides over Canada.
Thanks. I would say Canada's cities on average are much more densly populated. Our cities never experienced white flight to the suburbs on the same level as the United States. Not that all American cities are like this, but it's very rare to see cities that are hollowed out after downtown like you do in the US in places like Cleveland and Buffalo (or going south of the loop in Chicago).Actually, as per UN's definition of "urban" population (which I am assuming includes most suburban and even some exurban communities) the US's number is slightly higher than Canada's: 83% urban population in the US, 82% in Canada.
Thanks. I would say Canada's cities on average are much more densly populated. Our cities never experienced white flight to the suburbs on the same level as the United States. Not that all American cities are like this, but it's very rare to see cities that are hollowed out after downtown like you do in the US in places like Cleveland and Buffalo (or going south of the loop in Chicago).
Yeah, I believe that happened to a ton of the Great lakes region/Midwest. Cities like Buffalo (1901 Pan-American Exposition/World Fair) and St. Louis (1904 Summer Olympics) hosted major world-wide events early in the 20th century, but have significantly declined in global importance since.Yeah, but by these definitions of urban populations and realizing how small dilipidated urban cores are compared to their metro area, there's less of a difference. Most of those who white flew ended up in communities that still have the population density that many resources will consider "urban."
Philly lost ~320k people between 1960 and 1980, but neighboring Bucks and Montgomery Counties basically offset that loss in those time periods. And while Bucks was once considered rural, it's now well over 1,000 residents per square mile—which is apparently the UN definition for "urban" that the percentages I posted use. And Bucks is nothing compared to MontCo PA or the DC suburbs in...Montgomery County, Maryland (we have creative names here).
Deindustrialization is also a major force, and we do have some really extreme examples there—one of which you mentioned. Part of what makes Pittsburgh such a fascinating city, for example, is that it used to be one of the most important cities in the US. Top 10 in population for the first half of the 20th century. Today the city proper has only about 40% of the peak population it reached in 1940—now THAT is hollowing out. Similar story with Cleveland—900,000 people used to live there!
lol Funny enough if I had to really pick, I'd stick to all the teams closest to home. Familiar territory and all that.Nah dude you're missing the point, this is your chance to take dogwhistle shots at Canada and the coastal regions.
b Ut tH e tA xE s
What exactly does Toronto offer that an American city wouldn’t? Also with the weather being a hell of a lot better in the winters?Again, you said the population isn't concentrated. Canada's overall population is highly concentrated. About 90% of Canada's population lives with 100km of the American border. 1/3rd of it's population is in Southern Ontario. To say Canada's lack of crime is due to not having densly populated areas compared to the United States is just ill-informed. Hell, the highest rate of crime by region in the United States is the Southern United States which is much less densly populated than Eastern Seaboard or Southern California.
And, again, the benefits of the USA over Canada is highly subjective to who you are and what you want out of your life. NYC offers stuff no other market does in my mind, but Toronto where I live also offers a style of living very few american cities offer. If you want to live 15 miles from where you work in some generic suburb in a cookie-cutter mansion, every city in North America offers that.
Thanks. I would say Canada's cities on average are much more densly populated. Our cities never experienced white flight to the suburbs on the same level as the United States. Not that all American cities are like this, but it's very rare to see cities that are hollowed out after downtown like you do in the US in places like Cleveland and Buffalo (or going south of the loop in Chicago).
NYC and Chicago offer what Toronto does. I don't think any other American city offers as vibrant and livable downtown core. Not many American cities have a theatre district, a comparable night-life/entertainment district, nor Michelin-starred restaurants.What exactly does Toronto offer that an American city wouldn’t? Also with the weather being a hell of a lot better in the winters?
I just don’t understand what exactly a Canadian city offers you that a US one wouldn’t. Which is why the vast majority of these guys want to live in the US and not Canada.
Wait you actually think only Chicago and New York offer that in the entirety of the USA?NYC and Chicago offer what Toronto does. I don't think any other American city offers as vibrant and livable downtown core. Not many American cities have a theatre district, a comparable night-life/entertainment district, nor Michelin-starred restaurants.
If you want to live in a mansion in a subdivision with better weather, lower taxes, but live in constant gridlock commuting from the suburbs go right ahead. That's just not what I value in life, and not how I would choose to live if I'm making millions of dollars. If that's what NHLers or you prefer fine. But, not many American cities offer living in an urban environment in or near a downtown core like Toronto does.
And they all have those things wrapped up in a very livable downtown-core? I didn't list them as exclusive. I listed the combination as rare. I know LA, Bay-Area and Miami have Michelin-starred restaurants. I believe Vegas does too. So, yeah, only Chicago and NYC really offer that to a better or comparable level. You could argue SF or South Beach, but SF doesn't have a team, and the Panthers play in Broward county.Wait you actually think only Chicago and New York offer that in the entirety of the USA?
You are right there are no Michelin star restaurants anywhere else but those two cities. There are 5 US cities with more Michelin star restaurants than Toronto. Almost 6 with Miami.
I’m not touching the theatre district comment because there are literally too many cities to count that have those.
There’s also a healthy handful of US cities that do nightlife better than Toronto. Hell Toronto doesn’t even have the best nightlife in Canada. Montreal easily takes that.
I guess I can give you the livability so 1 out of 4 isn’t too bad.
Wait you actually think only Chicago and New York offer that in the entirety of the USA?NYC and Chicago offer what Toronto does. I don't think any other American city offers as vibrant and livable downtown core. Not many American cities have a theatre district, a comparable night-life/entertainment district, nor Michelin-starred restaurants.
If you want to live in a mansion in a subdivision with better weather, lower taxes, but live in constant gridlock commuting from the suburbs go right ahead. That's just not what I value in life, and not how I would choose to live if I'm making millions of dollars. If that's what NHLers or you prefer fine. But, not many American cities offer living in an urban environment in or near a downtown core like Toronto does.
So you just named a bunch of places that a player with money would rather be. Add in the weather factor and you have a couple more.And they all have those things wrapped up in a very livable downtown-core? I didn't list them as exclusive. I listed the combination as rare. I know LA, Bay-Area and Miami have Michelin-starred restaurants. I believe Vegas does too. So, yeah, only Chicago and NYC really offer that to a better or comparable level. You could argue SF or South Beach, but SF doesn't have a team, and the Panthers play in Broward county.
Toronto does high-end Nightlife better than Monteal (which is the bracket you are in as an NHL player), Montreal does night-life better overall.
Saw you added this after. Personally, I'm just not a fan of suburban living. Although, I do get why it counts under urban for the UNs definition. Probably why my list is dramatically different than some people posting here. I'm always going to be partial to cities with vibrant downtown cores/areas. If I'm an NHL player with options I'm living somewhere like River North in Chicago, Greenwich Village in NYC, near Crecent St in MTL, Georgetown in DC, or Back Bay in Boston (just using cities I'm familliar with). The last thing that would intrigue me is going to NYC to live in Long Island or Westchester, or since you seem to be a DC local given your references, to live in DC but end up in Fairfax, Virginia.But those deindustrialization examples correspond with the booms down south and out west. So a lot of people who left the smog in Cleveland and Pittsburgh just ended up in a city or a dense suburb in Texas or Arizona. Which is why you find Steelers and Browns bars in every city in the south and southwest.
You keep talking about Canada as a whole. Toronto doesn't tend to lose out on players they want to keep or are trying to get. Your lifestyle in Calgary or Edmonton as an NHL player is dramatically different than Toronto. Just like your life in Columbus or Buffalo is dramatically different than NYC or Chicago.Wait you actually think only Chicago and New York offer that in the entirety of the USA?
You are right there are no Michelin star restaurants anywhere else but those two cities. There are 5 US cities with more Michelin star restaurants than Toronto. Almost 6 with Miami.
I’m not touching the theatre district comment because there are literally too many cities to count that have those.
There’s also a healthy handful of US cities that do nightlife better than Toronto. Hell Toronto doesn’t even have the best nightlife in Canada. Montreal easily takes that.
I guess I can give you the livability so 1 out of
So you just named a bunch of places that a player with money would rather be. Add in the weather factor and you have a couple more.
Not hard to see why Canada continues to lose out on these players.
can you please culture war more, you're not culture warrior-ing enough5. Canada teams-That place is a shithole
4. Cali teams-See above
3. New York teams- See above
2. Chicago-See above
1. Toronto
Saw you added this after. Personally, I'm just not a fan of suburban living. Although, I do get why it counts under urban for the UNs definition. Probably why my list is dramatically different than some people posting here. I'm always going to be partial to cities with vibrant downtown cores/areas. If I'm an NHL player with options I'm living somewhere like River North in Chicago, Greenwich Village in NYC, near Crecent St in MTL, Georgetown in DC, or Back Bay in Boston (just using cities I'm familliar with). The last thing that would intrigue me is going to NYC to live in Long Island or Westchester, or since you seem to be a DC local given your references, to live in DC but end up in Fairfax, Virginia.
Toronto...culture of losing
California teams(all)...bad state government
New York teams(all)...bad state government
Washington. DC...bad local government, too political
Chicago...bad local government
Boston...the rest of New England refers to MA as massholes...for deservedly good reasons.