- Jun 22, 2018
- 8,953
- 21,176
Is this not universally recognized as a mistake yet or whatI mean, there's a reason Gretzky didn't shoot in Nagano.
Is this not universally recognized as a mistake yet or whatI mean, there's a reason Gretzky didn't shoot in Nagano.
While I agree, my guess is that the massive goaltenders and their equipment might cancel a lot of those things out.One of the best in his Era is the way I think you have to view it with how much the game changes over the years.
Putting players like Lemieux, Bure and Hull in today's NHL with no red line rule,3 on 3 overtime and having today sticks technology would be interesting to see their stats.
Luckily goalie pads were narrowed in width and height, some of the cheaters removed, shoulder pads and chest protectors now have to fit your body size, so they’ve shrunk.While I agree, my guess is that the massive goaltenders and their equipment might cancel a lot of those things out.
I said it then and maintain it now, if I was choosing a d-man as a shooter, it’d be a MacInnis and he’s going first with instruction to bomb a close range slapshot at Dom’s chest / head to try and scare the bejeezus out of him for those that follow.Is this not universally recognized as a mistake yet or what
Nice, the old Bobby Hull tactic back in the day, on his first couple of shifts.I said it then and maintain it now, if I was choosing a d-man as a shooter, it’d be a MacInnis and he’s going first with instruction to bomb a close range slapshot at Dom’s chest / head to try and scare the bejeezus out of him for those that follow.
Might as well just have him take off his skate and try to stab him at that pointI said it then and maintain it now, if I was choosing a d-man as a shooter, it’d be a MacInnis and he’s going first with instruction to bomb a close range slapshot at Dom’s chest / head to try and scare the bejeezus out of him for those that follow.
Whatever it takes. LolMight as well just have him take off his skate and try to stab him at that point
haven't you heard? lemieux and gretzky were too good so they dont countHow can he be the greatest of all time when 3 contemporary players scored better than his best multiple times each I wonder.. I mean don’t get me wrong he is arguably top 5 and definitely top 10 but I don’t get the criteria that ranks him #1.
Matthews 100% catches Ovechkin. Book it.
How can he be the greatest of all time when 3 contemporary players scored better than his best multiple times each I wonder.. I mean don’t get me wrong he is arguably top 5 and definitely top 10 but I don’t get the criteria that ranks him #1.
Bossy is an interesting argument for many reasons as the best goal scorer of all time. Among what has been said here already, he had a career shooting percentage of somewhere around 24%
A 24% career shooting percentage?!
That’s is ridiculous but how does it compare to Gretzky’s shooting percentage during the same timeframe? I imagine it would be pretty close. Maybe there’s another player who had an even higher shooting percentage. But that does sound crazy though.
Just not a serious opinion
Yes, it's close. Bossy shot 21.2% over his entire ten year career, Gretzky shot 20.6% over his first ten years. Over the eight years they overlapped (1980 to 1987), Gretzky was slightly ahead (21.0% - 20.5%).That’s is ridiculous but how does it compare to Gretzky’s shooting percentage during the same timeframe? I imagine it would be pretty close. Maybe there’s another player who had an even higher shooting percentage. But that does sound crazy though.
What era is this that you think Matthews is hands down the best goal scorer of exactly?Except Selanne wasn’t the hands down best goal scorer of his era, quite the difference there.
Not the OP but post-Ovechkin for sure. Now looking to be the best goal-scorer including that era if he keeps up his current paceWhat era is this that you think Matthews is hands down the best goal scorer of exactly?
Yea, I'd pick 66 easily as well. Mario made it look easy and effortless and times LMAO.Luckily I saw all of their careers and on eye test, Lemieux always struck me as the best. Eye test is nothing more than that.....completely unreliable but I can say if you asked me to pick one guy, do or die, to score, I'd go Lemieux.
Yes, it's close. Bossy shot 21.2% over his entire ten year career, Gretzky shot 20.6% over his first ten years. Over the eight years they overlapped (1980 to 1987), Gretzky was slightly ahead (21.0% - 20.5%).
During Bossy's career, there were 11 players who scored 100+ goals with >20% shooting percentage. (The leader was Charlie Simmer, who shot 23.3% during that span).
For some context - during Bossy's career, 40 players scored 100+ goals on >18% shooting. From 2006 to today, there were only two players who did that (Draisaitl and, surprisingly, Alex Tanguay).
What era is this that you think Matthews is hands down the best goal scorer of exactly?
What era is this that you think Matthews is hands down the best goal scorer of exactly?
...the one that he's in..?What era is this that you think Matthews is hands down the best goal scorer of exactly?