Carltons Cup
Let's Do This..
- Feb 22, 2018
- 2,908
- 4,700
Cold Cauliflower1 goal in 29 games. Don't think anyone saw this coming.
Cold Cauliflower1 goal in 29 games. Don't think anyone saw this coming.
Did Gainey trade for Weber, Petry, Suzuki, Danault, Edmundson, Armia sign Toffoli, Perry, Chiarot, Price, draft Lehkonen, Caufield, Evans, Romanov. Rode Gainey's asset, come on man.Management was garbage, Bergie rode Gaineys assets his entire tenure and left us with none now that he's gone, plus tons of bad contracts. Cup final was nice but the entire franchise was managed poorly for 8 years
Yes. And if you recall Patches took control of his own development and requested to be sent down to Hamilton Bulldogs because he wasn't being played in Montreal. Thought it would be better for his development if he was playing regularly as opposed to watching .Paciorrety , Suzuki (developed mostly outside of the org). They still deserve some credit for giving suzuki ice time i suppose
18th place Habs three best players in last years fluke run.Did Gainey trade for Weber, Petry, Suzuki, Danault, Edmundson, Armia sign Toffoli, Perry, Chiarot, Price, draft Lehkonen, Caufield, Evans, Romanov. Rode Gainey's asset, come on man.
There wasn't a single defenseman from Gainey's era still on the team when we made the finals. Only forward was Gallagher and I believe he was officially drafted under Gauthier.
I agree he gave out some bad contracts and his tenure ended badly... but it's a cycle game too. Of course I'd be more then happy if he didn't sign Armia, Hoffman and Savard(not too bad considering we need vet presence on the team and he isn't taking any youngster's spot at RD) last summer, but we likely won't need that cap for a few years anyway.
Biggest mistake was keeping (his buddies) amateur scouting and player developement departments untouched with so many years of failure.
In retrospec, I think we can also say Bergevin was a very good season manager, but a horrible summer manager .
People don’t seem to realize the impact Danault is having in LA. His line has been our best line all season, no matter who has been on his wings. His wingers have also played their best hockey when they’ve been on his line, no matter who it has been. Trevor Moore has been absolutely tearing it up on his wing with more than a point per game over the last 20 games. Before playing with Danault he had 1 or 2 points in his first 20 games.If that's the argument you're trying to make, you should be looking at this guy:
Who would have guessed that a small, one-dimensional winger would have trouble adapting to the NHL? Shocking, really.
Dude the team he inherited finished at the bottom of the standings in 2012 and had multiple bad contracts including Gomez, Gionta, Bourque with next to no prospects. After 2007, the only NHLer drafted by Timmins was Gallagher (before Bergevin's arrival). He didn't inherited a team any worse/better then he's giving up. IMO a lot of that also falls under the ownership lack of leadership too. Molson didn't spend up to the cap for most of the season in which we had a 'strong core', he was happy with one round of the playoff and a full Bell center.B
18th place Habs three best players in last years fluke run.
Price - inherited by MB
Weber - MB inherited Norris trophy winner Subban trades for Weber.
Suzuki - MB inherits highest scoring winger Habs have had since the 90s....trades him for Suzuki.
Bergevin took a bubble team with Price and turned it into a bubble team with Price. In ten years without developing anyone he drafted into a great player.
The team he left for the city and its fans is the worst team in the history of a 114 year old franchise.
A colossal failure and a waste of the the core he inherited.
Which included a future Hart trophy winner and a future Norris trophy winner . Both in their prime.
Yeah I remember, good thing he told the org how to develop him god knows what would have happened if he didint speak up , sadYes. And if you recall Patches took control of his own development and requested to be sent down to Hamilton Bulldogs because he wasn't being played in Montreal. Thought it would be better for his development if he was playing regularly as opposed to watching .
Made play offs in 2008 2009 2010 . 2011 and went 7 games with Stanley cup champs. 2012 - Lost their best player, Markov for the entire season . Got Markov back for 2013 and went right back to play offs. At this time Bergevin had Price , Subban , in their prime. Also has Markov back and third over all pick.Dude the team he inherited finished at the bottom of the standings in 2012 and had multiple bad contracts including Gomez, Gionta, Bourque with next to no prospects. After 2007, the only NHLer drafted by Timmins was Gallagher (before Bergevin's arrival). He didn't inherited a team any worse/better then he's giving up. IMO a lot of that also falls under the ownership lack of leadership too. Molson didn't spend up to the cap for most of the season in which we had a 'strong core', he was happy with one round of the playoff and a full Bell center.
Imo he wasn't in the best scenario at all with a poor prospect pool, bad contracts and a bad leadership from the owner.Made pkay offs in 2011 went 7 games with Stanley cup champs. Lost their best player Markov fur the entire 2012 season . Got Markov backbfur 2013 went right back to pkay offs. At this time Bergevin had Price , Subban , in theur prime. Also has Markov back and third over all pick.
4 seasons later they are ducking ass !
Gee, where did that just transpire again? So Bergevin got fired because the team was in the same state as when he got hired. I agree.Imo he wasn't in the best scenario at all with a poor prospect pool, bad contracts and a bad leadership from the owner.
Are you talking when Bergevin was hired or when he was fired?Imo he wasn't in the best scenario at all with a poor prospect pool, bad contracts and a bad leadership from the owner.
1 goal in 29 games. Don't think anyone saw this coming.
He had very high goal totals with the USNTDP. Off that and some scouting reports, Habs fans were convinced they drafted a surefire superstar within the hour of his drafting and it just kept going from there.I never understood the hype around him. He was the 15th overall pick. Not like some lotto pick.
Sometimes hard for a player to do that. Sounds obvious to the average fan, but you are basically asking to go from 1st class travel and 5 star hotels to riding the bus grinding 3 games in 3 days staying in a Holiday Inn while making 8% of what you make in the NHL (maybe even less depending on the structure of your bonuses). Yes, obviously, if the payoff comes true like Patches you make it back tenfold on your next deal. Also, for most guys who go straight to the NHL out of the CHL or NCAA this is their first real taste of extended failure.Yeah I remember, good thing he told the org how to develop him god knows what would have happened if he didint speak up , sad
We didn't tank for Marner or Nylander. We just were a terribly constructed team that sucked. Those were two years of Nonis trying to save his job, he def wasn't tanking, he just built a terribly flawed team. We only really had one year of intentionally bottoming out.Keep saying LOL all you want we know who you cheer for . You tanked for 3 ppg players and cant win a playoff round its embarassing. Keep hating
They could also trade him (not saying they would or should). So to your point, no they are not the only two options.Those are actually the only options
Thanks Captain Obvious
Moore is doing alot on his own. He is not a passenger and certainly not doing well because of Danault who is playing well in his own right.People don’t seem to realize the impact Danault is having in LA. His line has been our best line all season, no matter who has been on his wings. His wingers have also played their best hockey when they’ve been on his line, no matter who it has been. Trevor Moore has been absolutely tearing it up on his wing with more than a point per game over the last 20 games. Before playing with Danault he had 1 or 2 points in his first 20 games.
Danault has been the best center in LA this season, outplaying Kopitar. Nobody expected it but Danault has been far better than advertised and is easily the best free agent signing LA have made since the cup runs and maybe the best I can recall (I’m talking 30 years plus). Granted it’s only year one of his contract but so far it looks a great deal.
It’s hard to figure that his loss hasn’t hurt Montreal both on and off the ice.
They could also trade him (not saying they would or should). So to your point, no they are not the only two options.
A lot of people had him ranked much higher than he went, so people bought into the hype that way to. Button had him at 4, Pronman at 5, Peters at 6, McKenzie at 9.He had very high goal totals with the USNTDP. Off that and some scouting reports, Habs fans were convinced they drafted a surefire superstar within the hour of his drafting and it just kept going from there.
It's a bit amusing to me to see the talk of him not being put in an optimal position to succeed. It was the same line being fed during his run with team USA at the WJC. If Caufield just had some decent linemates he'd be right up there with Zegras among the scoring leaders. Maybe he's just not earning his place in optimal situations to succeed?
That's fair. I still saw a lot of fans default to his goal totals to give an answer to why he was such a steal/why he'd be a superstar.A lot of people had him ranked much higher than he went, so people bought into the hype that way to. Button had him at 4, Pronman at 5, Peters at 6, McKenzie at 9.
When the Wild were picking at 12... our board lost it we couldn't believe Boldy fell that far. We were thinking Caufield would be a possibility prior to draft day, but the moment Boldy was available, it was Boldy all the way! Biggest no brainer pick the Wild had since Gaborik at 3rd overall.A lot of people had him ranked much higher than he went, so people bought into the hype that way to. Button had him at 4, Pronman at 5, Peters at 6, McKenzie at 9.
1 goal in 29 games. Don't think anyone saw this coming.