Captain Crunch
Registered User
- Mar 31, 2019
- 2,405
- 1,727
The problem with including picks in a Brodie trade is we have precious few in the top 3 rounds for the next 3 years, so if we were to do that, we’re getting another bottom 6 dman. That’s not moving the needle at all. And I do not want to include Niemela unless we are getting a legitimate top 4 dman who is a strong PKer, and even then, I would be hesitant to do it.I don't know who is available. Some people called Mccabe a top 4 D but I disagree. He is cheap for what he offers though.
I do agree if the team wants a superstar D, it will have to trade one of the core. Don't think we need one.
Barring a superstar D, we are looking at moving a D and a pick or 2 for someone decent. Team doesn't need 8 dmen. The D would have to be Brodie as the other ones are not replaceable as they are young and cost contained ...unless Niemela is available.
If we want to trade the young cost contained guys for a D, it kind of screws us for the future.
Lets revisit trading a core member for a superstar again....one of the young guys isnt going to play in the NHL unless he is traded anyways. You are trading a core member to cost contain while moving a cost contained asset. Kind of counter intuitive. Maybe that is ok.
Personally, unless you are getting a guy like Quinn Hughes for Marner, I wouldn't do it
Unless you are getting a guy like Moritz Seider for Nylander (not a top 4 D yet IMO but will be), I wouldn't do it.
Unless you are getting Cale Makar for Matthews, I wouldn't do it.
People can laugh at my ask and say it isn't realistic but getting any of our guys for a bucket of pucks to just free cap is just dumb. These kind of players do not fall from trees.
Then you need to move one of your young guys
I would be all for trading Marner or Nylander for Hughes or Seider, or trading Matthews for Makar.