It's hilarious that anyone would blame Nash on that chance to begin with. It was a perfect shot that was miraculously deflected. These things happen.
Do not want Pavelski. Almost always bad to trade for guys off a career year.
They do, but when you score 3 goals in 25 playoff games, people aren't going to give you the benefit of the doubt.
So you're insinuating the shot was hard and fast?
Man, I almost forgot what the off season felt like. Let's Go Rangers!
Really? Were you predicting a trip to the finals this season? Probably not, which means you could be just as wrong about that again before Lundqvist retires. Jeez , it doesn't take long for people to get uber-negative again!
The Rangers need to add a PP QB on defense, a center to replace Richards - hopefully someone with some size and faceoff ability. I wouldn't mind another scoring winger.
If he shot it higher, he risks missing the net entirely. If he shot it harder, it gets deflected still and goes above the net still.
You're asking for him to do something that is basically impossible on a one-timer. You can only do so much with the puck on a one-time shot. It's why so many of them are off target to begin with (since you are at the mercy of physics).
Placing any amount of blame on him there is just ridiculous. The equivalent of someone blaming Hank for the OT goal against.
Yeah but you know how it is around here, the fact that these guys are actually human seems to be forgotten a lot.
I used to line the edge of the crease with pucks at the end of practices and try roof them it's something that is often extremely hard to pull off in game situations.
One positive is that we'll have a short offseason.
Tired of hearing about 1994 Rangers every time with these guys on MSG
Ifs, ands, or buts were candy and nuts.
It was absolutely a hard shot. It was a one time slap shot. He's not going to get that shot much harder than he did there. Wouldn't have mattered if he did, anyway, as it still would've been deflected. Just because a shot is harder doesn't mean Voynov's stick isn't there.
He may not put up 40-40 numbers again, but 25-50 is very likely.
It was absolutely a hard shot. It was a one time slap shot. He's not going to get that shot much harder than he did there. Wouldn't have mattered if he did, anyway, as it still would've been deflected. Just because a shot is harder doesn't mean Voynov's stick isn't there.
You're the one who is saying the "ifs" and "buts."
Blaming Nash there is beyond absurd.
So you're insinuating the shot was hard and fast?
Get the **** out of here. Just because it was a one timer doesn't mean he ****ing rocketed it. Compare his one timer to MSL and then come back to me if it's even in the same ballpark.