Alternatively, Vegas' debilitating shiny new toy syndrome bears potential for a disastrous effect on the team's long term success.
Most of Vegas' best players are either right in the middle of their prime or close to regression. Their established youth consists of Theodore, Krebs, Whitecloud, Tuch and Hague. We're talking about trading two of those 5 guys plus one more roster player for an established number one center. When the play of their core starts tailing off, who do they have in the pipeline to replace them?
I'll use my lifelong team as an example. Anaheim enjoyed long term status as a competitive team by drafting well and having a steady stream of solid young players to either come in and play well on their roster or wsre used to trade for solid but not blockbuster level roster talents. There were some good trades but a lot of them weren't. Eventually the Ducks ran out of good assets to supplement their roster and were forced into a rebuild. But at least they always had a strong pipeline and right now they're working on a solid foundation of talent behind guys like Zegras, Drysdale, Terry, Gibson, Lindholm, Comtois, etc.
The more Vegas burns every asset with value for the big name that suddenly becomes available the less they have to work with to keep their overall roster strong. As is right now we have a handful of injuries and it's resulted in playing a fourth line of entirely AHLers.
If this trade really does take Krebs, Theodore, another roster player and a first rounder, the Knights will have to basically hope the core they've got is enough and pray that Eichel is the same talent by the time he's recovered from surgery.
As a fan, I think this is too risky to be worth it.