That could just as easily lead to the notion that the price was the sticking point. Burke was unprepared to give up what Van wanted, while the board had directives to acquire Luongo at any cost.
I know MLSE is stupid but they can't be that stupid.
I think that:
-Burke firing was not based on his performance as the GM of the Leafs or at the least it didn't play a big part. If it did..he'd be long gone.
-Can't be because he doesn't want to give up too much for Luongo. That's just insanse.. I don't know why Nonis would agree to be GM if all of his hockey moves would then be criticized by people who don't know anything about hockey.
-Burke firing had more to do with Burke's personality and the conflict between him and the upper management.
If Burke was fired because he didn't overpay for Luongo (which he can't even do...since you still can't make any trades official anyway)...Mike Gillis could just as well as for the moon and we'd have to pay it and that doesn't sound right.
If Mike Gillis says that there are other teams involved in this...go ahead and trade him there, we're good without getting Luongo if it means giving up 10-12 good years of Gardiner.
I have no problem trading Gardiner.. but there are 28 other teams that would give us a better offer than Gardiner+ for Luongo.
He's still controlled for ~5 years, has great IQ, elite skater, give him #1PP minutes and he gets you 45-50 points. Defenseman are hard to get and trading them for a 34 year old goalie is the last thing the Leafs need.