I doubt it. I get the impression he is pretty content on staying where he is. He has a 1 year old now (11 months technically). I don't see him uprooted his family to chase a cup at this point in time.Markstrom is going to ask for a trade once Hanifin and Tanev are gone. I think the Flames fall into a bottom 5 finish
Looking into the numbers. Horvat is a slightly worse defensive player and significantly better offensive player.Lindholm is absolutely a better all around player than Horvat, he just isn't riding a ridiculous 21.7% shooting percentage, instead it's the exact opposite as Lindholm is at a 6.8% shooting percentage this season. Even if Horvat is a better offensive player (debatable), Lindholm is a far superior 200 ft player.
It's worth noting that they haven't committed to extending him yet either, but overall Lindholm will likely be a better fit and I think he will have similar synergy with EP40 as he did with Gaudreau
Is he even available?i guess we can take Vancouver off the market for jake.
i guess we can take Vancouver off the market for jake.
Vancouver pays through the nose. They must really think they have a legit Cup chance.
I am not comparing them. They are not remotely closeKuz was great playing losing pond hockey. Lots of skill, great guy, not interested in forechecking or backchecking. Lindholm is a solid right handed face off guy who excels playing with other good players. He will be playing with Pettersson, he will be just fine.
Kuzmenko wouldn't have seen the ice with Sutter coaching. You're stuck comparing apples to tires.
i guess we can take Vancouver off the market for jake.
I didn't. The proposal I had made was one of Lekkerimakki or Willander and a 1st with a short term cap dump coming to us and Lindholm at 50%. The other proposal I made was a 1st, Bru, and either Pod or a 2nd and a short term cap dump to us for Lindholm at 50%. We basically got what I was hoping for without retention if you consider the conditional pick and the Finn equal to a 2nd.Actually you had Brew in a lesser tier and had a ridiculous proposal which I said was way off and it was.
Don't pretend you didn't expect Lekkerimakki and one of Brew plus a a 1st.
Seems like an incredible trade for CGY IMO. Kuzmenko being a "throw-in" is insane. Can't argue against Tocchet's results, but it is a huge blunder to coach a guy of this skill level out the door.
I think it does. Their time-of-puck-possession relative to their shot attempts, or shot attempts relative to their scoring chances ratios are quite skewed. They seem to forgo bad shots, hold the puck, and wait for better chances.This makes for an excellent natural experiment into whether the Canucks system actually promotes high shooting percentage.
A coach expecting a player to buy into a system (that works), he was a flash in the pan last year in a system that put us in the basement as a team. If your blaming the coach for Kuz sucking this year, you don't understand hockey.Seems like an incredible trade for CGY IMO. Kuzmenko being a "throw-in" is insane. Can't argue against Tocchet's results, but it is a huge blunder to coach a guy of this skill level out the door.
The defense will have Oesterle playing top 4 minutes. I think the Flames are going to fall hard once they have three #7 Dmen getting regular minutes.I doubt it. I get the impression he is pretty content on staying where he is. He has a 1 year old now (11 months technically). I don't see him uprooted his family to chase a cup at this point in time.
Falling into the bottom 5 will be hard as they are so far behind us at the moment, but we are definitely going to see less scoring from Sharangovich and the Kadri line. Lindholm did a lot of heavy lifting in terms of opponent match ups. Kadri's line was pretty much always deployed against 3rd and 4th liners
Kuzmenko thrived under run and gun Boudreau garbage hockey being forcefed premium minutes with Pettersson and 70%+ PP deployment.
The minute they brought in a real coach (Tocchet) who enacted a new system that involved playing defence and backchecking which has incidentally led to sustainable success for the first time in a decade, Kuzmenko's game imploded.
It's not even a blunder by the coach, he forcefed PP1 time and chained him to Pettersson and the other good players on this roster and he just couldn't keep up or produce, even at a pretty normal 12% shooting clip (less than half the previous year).
Look at the numbers? Lindholm's "numbers" are based entirely off of him playing with scrubs and middle 6 guys.Looking into the numbers. Horvat is a slightly worse defensive player and significantly better offensive player.
In response to the person you responded to though, the Canucks can easily rent Lindholm at the price they paid. The brilliant part is they got out from 5.5 mil in cap committed to Kuzmenko for next yr so they could decide to sign a different UFA.
I wouldn't wanna give Lindholm over 5 yrs though. And he will rightly demand 7 or 8 yrs as this is his last big contract.
Markstrom is going to ask for a trade once Hanifin and Tanev are gone. I think the Flames fall into a bottom 5 finish
Look at the numbers? Lindholm's "numbers" are based entirely off of him playing with scrubs and middle 6 guys.
Horvat played significant minutes with Miller and one of Boeser/Garland last year. Those are vastly superior linemates than Lindholm did last year or this year. Even then of his 31 goals and 54 points, only 16 goals and 30 points came at even strength. Besides that he had 10 goals and 17 points on the powerplay, plus 1 goal and 2 points short handed. That leaves 3 goals and 5 points on empty nets.
Lindholm is probably going to be deployed at center for Pettersson and on the first powerplay unit too. There are 33 games left for the Nucks this year, I would not be surprised at all if he gets 45 points in that time.
Kuz probably best fit for a non playoff team to a bubble team with his current style. PO teams want a more responsible 200 foot game, which Tocchet was trying to get Kuz to play.I think he'll do better in CGY with less expectations and likely way more of a leash to get production that can lead to him being a trade piece next year based on counting stats alone, but even last year when he was on a 40 goal pace @ $900k teams weren't busting down the door trying to hand out 1st round picks to get this guy because they saw the overall flaws in his game and didn't feel he would be be able to carry that success into tight checking playoff games.
I don't think that will happen, I think we add an NHL caliber defenseman at some point in one of our returns (maybe even to facilitate another team's trade). I could also see us buying low on someone like Boqvist or somethingThe defense will have Oesterle playing top 4 minutes. I think the Flames are going to fall hard once they have three #7 Dmen getting regular minutes.
I think he will get ~40 in 33 games. I give it a +/- 5 points. So I think 45 is absolutely possibleBreaking that bottom 5 is tough. I'd like to see it though. If you're going rebuild, do it right. Probably too late for a bottom 3 pick. Apparently the team is shopping Markstrom, but won't move him unless it's for a solid package. Then Markstrom has to approve the deal.
His numbers are likely to improve, especially if he has chemistry with Pettersson. 45 points in 33 games is optimistic though. I see him returning to a 35 goal and 70 point pace though.
Kuz probably best fit for a non playoff team to a bubble team with his current style. PO teams want a more responsible 200 foot game, which Tocchet was trying to get Kuz to play.
Agree that he'll be fine in Calgary, but if he's not long for Calgary, probably best to be an off-season move as I don't see him being a target of PO teams at the TDL in 2025.
My guess is they chatted, Vancouver proposed a similar offer to Pittsburgh, and Pittsburgh said no (or left it open to future negotiations).If Guentzel was even available, management would have targeted him? There’s no way JR and PA are waiting around for Dubas and Guentzel to make a decision. They better hurry fast if they even think there’s a potential trade.
I would settle on grading them as roughly equivalent. Horvat's managed to get by with very mediocre wingers for the majority of his Canucks tenure. He finally has a player to play with. Lindholm gets the edge defensively.Lindholm is absolutely a better all around player than Horvat, he just isn't riding a ridiculous 21.7% shooting percentage, instead it's the exact opposite as Lindholm is at a 6.8% shooting percentage this season. Even if Horvat is a better offensive player (debatable), Lindholm is a far superior 200 ft player.
It's worth noting that they haven't committed to extending him yet either, but overall Lindholm will likely be a better fit and I think he will have similar synergy with EP40 as he did with Gaudreau
I think it does. Their time-of-puck-possession relative to their shot attempts, or shot attempts relative to their scoring chances ratios are quite skewed. They seem to forgo bad shots, hold the puck, and wait for better chances.
I don't think this leads to a 13% team shooting percentage (which would be the highest recorded for a full season in the cap era), but elevated above average.
Anyway, Lindholm is shooting 6% right now. That's going to come up regardless of whether anything else above is true. I think we're confident he's not a true talent league-worst finisher.