Proposal: Trouba Mega Thread Part VI

Status
Not open for further replies.

lomiller1

Registered User
Jan 13, 2015
6,409
2,968
My take is however this -- and I could be wrong for sure --

You are. In fact it’s more a case of you just making **** up.
I saw Joel Armia the first time in 2009, I know who he is. I am not a very big fan. Ok player, but not a great fit in today's game

What part of big, fast, incredible hands and a great defensive game “doesn’t fit today’s game�
Shawn Mattias is in the same mold for me
Other than size and both being good skaters they are basically polar opposite of Armia
Drew Stafford brings a lot of energy

Drew Stafford is the opposite of an “energy†player. He’s an offensive guy who likes to slow down the game, hold onto the puck and look for offensive plays. He’s got great hands and can stickhandle in small spaces while he looks for plays to develop, but doesn’t play with a lot of pace.
I really like Connor, but like to me is a bit of a poor man's Teevu Teravainen if you get what I mean.
Again a puzzling comparison. Connor is bigger, or at least taller for now, a lot faster, better with the puck at speed and has a much better shot. A better skill package doesn’t always translate into better production, but it’s way too early to be calling something like that, especially when Connor was so much more productive in his pre-NHL career.

When you claim that JT Miller only would be a marginal upgrade over what you got, I just don't think you are right. Right or wrong, go and check the Rangers board, JT Miller is NYR's Nikolaj
Ehlers was as good at 19 as Miller at 23
Right or wrong, go and check the Rangers board, Chris Kreider is NYR's Mark Schleife. And Kreider has been just sick this season.

They play different positions, play totally different styles and Scheifele is 2 years younger and already better even without taking position into account. A better comparison is would be that Kreider is a poor man’s Wheeler.
Actually I never wrote any of the things you quoted, you took everything I said and twisted it. Why?

“Ehlers tops out as a 3rd liner†= I said, Ehlers will at least become a great 3rd lineer/good 2nd liner, how much potential does he have if he finds more of a scoring touch?
You don’t exactly need to twist it. Adding that “maybe he could be a good second liner†doesn’t change the insinuation that you think he may top out as a 3rd liner.

“Scheifele will never be as good Backes†= I said, is Scheifele the next Backes or the next Toews?
In a normal conversation asking if he’s the “the next Backes†says Backes is better for now. FYI Scheifele is a lot better than Backes, and was better than Toews last year.

“Little is only a third line C†= I never commented on Little??
Post 719
not overly sold on Little/Perrault as 2-3 centers on a contender
Speaks for itself...

“Kyle Connor won’t be a top 9 forward†= Never said that
Post 77

Left wing -- Sure Laine - will -- become a franchise sniper. Ehlers will become a great 3rd lineer or decent 2nd lineer, at worst. Behind him there isn't much.
Given that Connor plays LW there are not too many ways to interpret this...
 

Number1RedWingsFan52

Registered User
Mar 17, 2013
40,243
6,038
Winter Haven Florida
If its true that one of the motivating factors is for his girlfriend to get into medical school, Boston may indeed be a very attractive destination. I hear there are a couple of decent schools in the area.

Pretty sure this has absolutely nothing to do with his girlfriend and her Med School issues. More then his Dad's supposed legal issues and him not being aloud in Canada pretty sure that it has more to do with his personal family then his girlfriend.
 

cneely

Registered User
Jan 6, 2005
10,274
1,427
Pretty sure this has absolutely nothing to do with his girlfriend and her Med School issues. More then his Dad's supposed legal issues and him not being aloud in Canada pretty sure that it has more to do with his personal family then his girlfriend.

I'm of the opinion that it has nothing to do with either one of those things, more about the climate and tax regime in Manitoba. I'm just reiterating the rumours I've heard.
 

Coach Parker

Stanley Cup Champion
Jun 22, 2008
22,477
9,689
Vancouver, B.C.
If Kypreos is right that the WPG ask from BOS was Spooner, Carlo, and a 1st for Trouba, than the Rangers can beat that offer easily.

Not sure we want to at this point, the offense looks so good and the defense has been tolerable, and I'm more averse to trading JT Miller than I was. But for sake of argument, assuming Kypreos is reporting accurately (big assumption), then Zucc/Skjei/1st should get this done. Or Miller/Skjei. Again, not sure I really want to do that. If Trouba winds up signing for 1 year so he can play, and the trade talk stretches into Fall 2017, by that time Skjei alone could be worth Trouba. Or Miller alone. A lot can happen, and if I'm Jeff Gorton I just wait it out at this point. Really, all teams involved including WPG have the luxury of time.

For arguments' sake:

Spooner > Zuccarello (contract, age are the only tie-breakers as they are similar in stats)
Skjei = Carlo (edge to Carlo being 19 and Skjei being 22)
1st NYR < 1st BOS (Rangers are better)

Bruins, 19 and 24, 1.846 million.
Rangers, 22 and 29, 5.425 million.

So how is that 'easily' beating the Bruins offer? Seems to me the Jets take on a 4.5 million contract vs a 925k as well as him being half a decade older, an older defensive prospect and a later 1st?

I'm not saying the Jets want either trade but the Bruins one has the edge in contract status, age, 1st potential and overall value once the two are compared.
 

Gardner McKay

RIP, Jimmy.
Jun 27, 2007
26,033
15,497
SoutheastOfDisorder
For arguments' sake:

Spooner > Zuccarello (contract, age are the only tie-breakers as they are similar in stats)
Skjei = Carlo (edge to Carlo being 19 and Skjei being 22)
1st NYR < 1st BOS (Rangers are better)

Bruins, 19 and 24, 1.846 million.
Rangers, 22 and 29, 5.425 million.

So how is that 'easily' beating the Bruins offer? Seems to me the Jets take on a 4.5 million contract vs a 925k as well as him being half a decade older, an older defensive prospect and a later 1st?

I'm not saying the Jets want either trade but the Bruins one has the edge in contract status, age, 1st potential and overall value once the two are compared.

Zucc put up 61 points last year. Spooner 49. That is quite the generous definition of similar.
 

gump116

Registered User
Sponsor
Feb 24, 2009
662
515
New York
So she can't get into a Canadian Medical school , but she can get into Harvard?

Completely off topic, but Canadian Medical schools are actually much harder to get into than American ones because they're a lot cheaper and there aren't that many of them. I know a dual citizen American/Canadian who couldn't get into a single Canadian med school and got into multiple Ivy League level med schools in the states. And as someone else stated, a lot of Canadian med schools won't accept international students. Kind of a legitimate reason for Trouba to want to move, but I do wonder if University of Manitoba would make an exception for his girlfriend if it meant him staying with the Jets :).
 

Coach Parker

Stanley Cup Champion
Jun 22, 2008
22,477
9,689
Vancouver, B.C.
Zucc put up 61 points last year. Spooner 49. That is quite the generous definition of similar.

Okay, so 12 points difference is worth that 3.5 million? Even if you wanted to say Zuccarello is better right now about to hit 30 why would that cap hit and 5 years age difference appeal to a team in the middle of a rebuild over a center who is younger and a RFA at the end?

I'd even turn the > to an = and the deal is still better from Boston given Carlo's age and the projected placement of the 1st round pick Hell, even if you convinced me that the prospects were equal and that Carlo will only be as good as Skjei is now in three years and that the Bruins are going to finish ahead of the Rangers making the Draft pick better for New York...

...if all of that occurred, how is that deal 'easily' better than the Bruins one? At best, this argument takes us to the deals being equal and then the age and cap hits are all more and older. I was simply arguing that this deal is in no way 'easily' better than the bruins one at all.
 

jay from jersey

Registered User
Jan 30, 2008
6,319
4,661
For arguments' sake:

Spooner > Zuccarello (contract, age are the only tie-breakers as they are similar in stats)
Skjei = Carlo (edge to Carlo being 19 and Skjei being 22)
1st NYR < 1st BOS (Rangers are better)

Bruins, 19 and 24, 1.846 million.
Rangers, 22 and 29, 5.425 million.

So how is that 'easily' beating the Bruins offer? Seems to me the Jets take on a 4.5 million contract vs a 925k as well as him being half a decade older, an older defensive prospect and a later 1st?

I'm not saying the Jets want either trade but the Bruins one has the edge in contract status, age, 1st potential and overall value once the two are compared.


most likely miller over Zuc in the trade above... Miller signed for under 3 mill for 2 years then RFA. Spooner needs a contract after this year. Miller can play all 3 FWD positions. spooner is a center. looked poor at wing. Miller has progressed every year. Playing better then spooner now. spooner is a bit younger ( nevermind miller is a year younger). the first Rd picks will be within 7 of eachother. even with trouba doubt rangers win the cup this year. Carlo is younger then skjei. both will be top 4-d in this league for a long long time. I highly doubt boston deals carlo. They are weak on the left stronger on RD but who knows. They do have MvAvoy who i think personally will be the best D of his draft. I just can't see the B's dealing carlo. With graves almost there and McD and Staal signed I can see the Rangers dealing skjei. but I could be wrong
 

jay from jersey

Registered User
Jan 30, 2008
6,319
4,661
dude

Okay, so 12 points difference is worth that 3.5 million? Even if you wanted to say Zuccarello is better right now about to hit 30 why would that cap hit and 5 years age difference appeal to a team in the middle of a rebuild over a center who is younger and a RFA at the end?

I'd even turn the > to an = and the deal is still better from Boston given Carlo's age and the projected placement of the 1st round pick.

this is a contract yr for spooner he's going to get a raise. Zucc is signed at 4.5 for the next 3
 

Saitama

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Oct 20, 2010
8,589
6,325
Winnipeg
Great stuff, and I hear you.

My take is however this -- and I could be wrong for sure -- I think you guys are overrating your current roster and farm. I just don't see a bunch of very valuable players worth protecting and I just don't see an overfull farm not counting the players already in the NHL. I saw Joel Armia the first time in 2009, I know who he is. I am not a very big fan. Ok player, but not a great fit in today's game IMO and I don't think he is the type who can like help make a line special on a contender. Shawn Mattias is in the same mold for me. Drew Stafford brings a lot of energy, but to be honest he also lacks a lot of things in his game. A 6'6 forward like Adam Lowry just don't do much for me given how the game is looking.

I really like Connor, but like to me is a bit of a poor man's Teevu Teravainen if you get what I mean. Or "poor man's" is a bad choice of words, more like in the same mold as TT. Will need some time. Probably will become a good player. But not a lock to become a good player, also a kid that really needs to be put in the same environment. Wheeler is getting older. Little has a ton of miles on his body.

When you claim that JT Miller only would be a marginal upgrade over what you got, I just don't think you are right. Right or wrong, go and check the Rangers board, JT Miller is NYR's Nikolaj Ehlers, just 3 years longer into his development path. JT has pwned a U18 WJC. Been very good on a team that won a U20 WJCs. He came in as an optimistic puck hog who skated eights around everyone before crashing into someone or something. Then got a few years of tough love and has shaped up his 2-way game, and now is starting to find that mix.

Right or wrong, go and check the Rangers board, Chris Kreider is NYR's Mark Schleife. And Kreider has been just sick this season.

And I never proposed that Winnipeg should trade Trouba for forwards, I did include Brady Skjei in my proposal.



Actually Gump, I have never made any kind of proposal with only forwards for Trouba. How about reading a posts before making personal attacks on a poster? That is apparently too much to ask for...



Sorry don't agree, think Jets also has holes up front.



Actually I never wrote any of the things you quoted, you took everything I said and twisted it. Why?

“Ehlers tops out as a 3rd liner†= I said, Ehlers will at least become a great 3rd lineer/good 2nd liner, how much potential does he have if he finds more of a scoring touch?

“Scheifele will never be as good Backes†= I said, is Scheifele the next Backes or the next Toews?

“Little is only a third line C†= I never commented on Little??

“Kyle Connor won’t be a top 9 forward†= Never said that, said that he hasn't been great so far, but its too early to pass judgement on him.

Like why do you make things up? Does it really make you feel that much better? Sorry if I offended you in any way, which I recon I must have done to cause this reaction... :(



Yeah I know about it, and Winnipeg isn't the only organization with a roster of NHL players and a farm. You should surf around some at that place, would give you a better perspective.

Just think you guys are overrating these kids a bit. Hope I am wrong, always liked Winnipeg! ;)



Yeah, you are probably right. Since Trouba is holding out, its 3 in and 1 out from the current roster, but that is besides the point. Like I said, I do think someone will pay more than NYR is able to eventually. That offer is not great value for Winnipeg. But I do not however agree that it is a worthless joke of a return. I actually think its pretty decent. That is THREE very good young hockey players already established in the NHL and proven winners. Would really change the outlook of Winnipeg instantly. Can you imagine having Schleife AND Kreider on the same team? That would be pretty sick. Miller is very very good young hockey player. Skjei has just been sick so far this season. Many argue that he is NYR's 2nd best D right now.

Wow, I have never seen someone put together such an amazing post that points out exactly how clueless they are about the team they think they know! That's fantastic, thanks for the entertainment! :laugh:
 

ffh

Registered User
Jul 16, 2016
8,489
5,253
For arguments' sake:

Spooner > Zuccarello (contract, age are the only tie-breakers as they are similar in stats)
Skjei = Carlo (edge to Carlo being 19 and Skjei being 22)
1st NYR < 1st BOS (Rangers are better)

Bruins, 19 and 24, 1.846 million.
Rangers, 22 and 29, 5.425 million.

So how is that 'easily' beating the Bruins offer? Seems to me the Jets take on a 4.5 million contract vs a 925k as well as him being half a decade older, an older defensive prospect and a later 1st?

I'm not saying the Jets want either trade but the Bruins one has the edge in contract status, age, 1st potential and overall value once the two are compared.[/QUOTE


the problem is most jets fans think trouba is coming back and signing a 6 year contract to boot. and if he doesn't then we should cut off our nose to spite our face and make him suffer for years by not trading him till we receive a kings ransom for him witch is not going to happen. I for one want chevy to wait up till the 30th if need be and get his best deal whatever it is and make the trade. he owes the players on the team this.
 

cobra427

Registered User
May 6, 2012
9,403
3,430
You say on one hand that he is only worth what is offered, and then in the next paragraph state "the rest of the NHL knows his hand". This is the problem. I think the rest of the NHL is trying to see if Chevy will blink and are making offers that may not be full fair market value. Chevy's job for the Jets is to hold out as long as it takes to make sure that he gets fair value, and other teams are very aware that he is not willing to take less than fair value just for the sake of making a move.

Trouba is a young second pairing D with 1st pairing potential. That means he has high value. But, since he is not signed, is holding out, and has publicly said he does not want to play for the Jets, and needs to be traded by December 1st, all of that hurts his trade value. Jets fans and Chevy can pretend the above does not hurt his value, but it does hurt his value. The timing of trading him now versus last summer hurts his value in that their are less buyers now.

Trouba's agent could be telling other clubs what Trouba would sign for and he could also be telling them Trouba will never sign with the Jets. If another GM believes it, he won't over pay.
 

cneely

Registered User
Jan 6, 2005
10,274
1,427
Trouba is a young second pairing D with 1st pairing potential. That means he has high value. But, since he is not signed, is holding out, and has publicly said he does not want to play for the Jets, and needs to be traded by December 1st, all of that hurts his trade value. Jets fans and Chevy can pretend the above does not hurt his value, but it does hurt his value. The timing of trading him now versus last summer hurts his value in that their are less buyers now.

Trouba's agent could be telling other clubs what Trouba would sign for and he could also be telling them Trouba will never sign with the Jets. If another GM believes it, he won't over pay.

Then he can sit.
IMO, he'll sit until Chevy receives what he believes to be a fair value offer. If that's next year, so be it. The Jets are not in win now mode.
 

Coach Parker

Stanley Cup Champion
Jun 22, 2008
22,477
9,689
Vancouver, B.C.
most likely miller over Zuc in the trade above... Miller signed for under 3 mill for 2 years then RFA. Spooner needs a contract after this year. Miller can play all 3 FWD positions. spooner is a center. looked poor at wing. Miller has progressed every year. Playing better then spooner now. spooner is a bit younger ( nevermind miller is a year younger). the first Rd picks will be within 7 of eachother. even with trouba doubt rangers win the cup this year. Carlo is younger then skjei. both will be top 4-d in this league for a long long time. I highly doubt boston deals carlo. They are weak on the left stronger on RD but who knows. They do have MvAvoy who i think personally will be the best D of his draft. I just can't see the B's dealing carlo. With graves almost there and McD and Staal signed I can see the Rangers dealing skjei. but I could be wrong

Miller is a different story and should be an enticing offer for the comparison. If it was Miller,Skjei and a 1st then you'd think the Jets take that offer over the Boston one given that Miller is younger and fills a need in Winnipeg while Skjei is the LHD (correct?) they need over a RHD in Carlo.
 

nyr__1994

Registered User
Apr 4, 2006
709
172
Raleigh, NC
For arguments' sake:

Spooner > Zuccarello (contract, age are the only tie-breakers as they are similar in stats) Zuccarello career .67 ppg, Spooner .56 ppg. Not exactly similar. There is a 4 year difference in age, but Zucc is under contract for another 2 years and Spooner is Arb Eligible RFA this year. Their contracts could very well be similar after this season.
Skjei = Carlo (edge to Carlo being 19 and Skjei being 22) Skjei is Left Handed and a greater need for Winnipeg so not sure your analysis is correct here
1st NYR < 1st BOS (Rangers are better)

Bruins, 19 and 24, 1.846 million. Spooner will be 25 in a month and Zucc just turned 29 so there is a 4 year difference in age, not 5.
Rangers, 22 and 29, 5.425 million.

So how is that 'easily' beating the Bruins offer? Seems to me the Jets take on a 4.5 million contract vs a 925k as well as him being half a decade older, an older defensive prospect and a later 1st?

I'm not saying the Jets want either trade but the Bruins one has the edge in contract status, age, 1st potential and overall value once the two are compared.

The biggest difference in value is Carlo is Right Handed and Skjei is Left Handed. Ask any Jets fan which is a bigger need?
 

Coach Parker

Stanley Cup Champion
Jun 22, 2008
22,477
9,689
Vancouver, B.C.
For arguments' sake:

Spooner > Zuccarello (contract, age are the only tie-breakers as they are similar in stats)
Skjei = Carlo (edge to Carlo being 19 and Skjei being 22)
1st NYR < 1st BOS (Rangers are better)

Bruins, 19 and 24, 1.846 million.
Rangers, 22 and 29, 5.425 million.

So how is that 'easily' beating the Bruins offer? Seems to me the Jets take on a 4.5 million contract vs a 925k as well as him being half a decade older, an older defensive prospect and a later 1st?

I'm not saying the Jets want either trade but the Bruins one has the edge in contract status, age, 1st potential and overall value once the two are compared.[/QUOTE


the problem is most jets fans think trouba is coming back and signing a 6 year contract to boot. and if he doesn't then we should cut off our nose to spite our face and make him suffer for years by not trading him till we receive a kings ransom for him witch is not going to happen. I for one want chevy to wait up till the 30th if need be and get his best deal whatever it is and make the trade. he owes the players on the team this.

Solid point. I think they take the best deal at the 30th as well provided the team acquiring him hasn't bottomed out (Boston or Detroit) by then and decided the 1st is too high to trade.

That's the only scenario (or a major piece like Miller gets injured) where I don't see why the Jets simply don't wait it out until the 30th.
 

KingDeathMetal

Registered User
Jun 7, 2015
1,181
469
Long Island, NY
For arguments' sake:

Spooner > Zuccarello (contract, age are the only tie-breakers as they are similar in stats)
Skjei = Carlo (edge to Carlo being 19 and Skjei being 22)
1st NYR < 1st BOS (Rangers are better)

Bruins, 19 and 24, 1.846 million.
Rangers, 22 and 29, 5.425 million.

So how is that 'easily' beating the Bruins offer? Seems to me the Jets take on a 4.5 million contract vs a 925k as well as him being half a decade older, an older defensive prospect and a later 1st?

I'm not saying the Jets want either trade but the Bruins one has the edge in contract status, age, 1st potential and overall value once the two are compared.

Spooner is not > Zucc on any planet.

Skjei > Carlo. Age doesn't matter when you're talking about 19 and 22, it's a wash. If anything edge to Skjei because he's a bit older, has more NHL experience and has shown himself capable of playing at a high level in the Top 4 both in regular season and playoffs (WPG wants a D who can step in and play right now). Also, Jets need a LD, which Skjei is, while Carlo is RD. Skjei's got elite speed, too. In terms of talent ceiling, Skjei tends to be the higher rated player, at least from what I gather.

If age and contract are your concern, then swap out Zucc for JT Miller in that deal, and it gets even better.

To me, it's a no-brainer, if that's what the Jets are looking for.
 

Snowman

Registered User
Oct 12, 2007
3,248
3,196
Texas
people understand the price. But no one is willing to pay it. So at what point will the jets say, this player needs to be moved because he's not helping the team by not playing. Maybe the return won't help as much as he would have had he been playing but the return will help more than him on the bench.

When does jets management say that to themselves

We're probably a few years away from that. Look how long Kane wanted a trade and how long it took for it to happen. Trading Trouba for sub-par value will NEVER help the Jets, now or in the future.
 

Snowman

Registered User
Oct 12, 2007
3,248
3,196
Texas
this is a bad analogy. It should be more like you have a 500k house you can't live in. so you sell it for a 300k house and a 150k beach house. both can go up in value over time when the neighborhood builds up cause they are both young new houses. Might never be as nice as the 500 k house or in the long run they could both go up. the housing markets are crazy

I agree, the housing analogy is a bad one. But you made it not me, so I don't know what you're getting at.
 

jay from jersey

Registered User
Jan 30, 2008
6,319
4,661
yea

Solid point. I think they take the best deal at the 30th as well provided the team acquiring him hasn't bottomed out (Boston or Detroit) by then and decided the 1st is too high to trade.

That's the only scenario (or a major piece like Miller gets injured) where I don't see why the Jets simply don't wait it out until the 30th.

I'm with you. beyond the 30th (barring any injuries) I don't see teams being hot after him that want to compete this year. NYR for example would shift to vatanen,hamiltion, shattenkirk,etc if the jets chose to hold him after and he can't play this year. That would dramaticlly drop the teams that want him out of the running. say for example NYR trades miller for vats. Buyout girardi at the end of year to protect Mcd,vats, staal. Ideally sign a UFA like shatty. there would be no reason to trade for trouba. DET with fowler, etc... My point is i cannot see this not going down before DEC 1st.. if jets hold him, the nxt viable time to trade him would be at the draft next year.. I don't see a situation with a team deliberatly tanking like the sabres when they traded for kane and was satisfied he wasn't going to play for a year. IMO the potential suiters list gets smaller if the jets choose to hold him beyond Dec 1. if that makes sense to everyone
 

nyr__1994

Registered User
Apr 4, 2006
709
172
Raleigh, NC
We're probably a few years away from that. Look how long Kane wanted a trade and how long it took for it to happen. Trading Trouba for sub-par value will NEVER help the Jets, now or in the future.

One of these situations is not like the other. Kane was still playing and because of that had to wait 3 years to get out. Trouba probably saw that and said I would rather give up a year than sit in Winnipeg for the next 3 years while Chevy sits on his ass..
 

Coach Parker

Stanley Cup Champion
Jun 22, 2008
22,477
9,689
Vancouver, B.C.
Spooner is not > Zucc on any planet.

Skjei > Carlo. Age doesn't matter when you're talking about 19 and 22, it's a wash. If anything edge to Skjei because he's a bit older, has more NHL experience and has shown himself capable of playing at a high level in the Top 4 both in regular season and playoffs (WPG wants a D who can step in and play right now). Also, Jets need a LD, which Skjei is, while Carlo is RD. Skjei's got elite speed, too. In terms of talent ceiling, Skjei tends to be the higher rated player, at least from what I gather.

If age and contract are your concern, then swap out Zucc for JT Miller in that deal, and it gets even better.

To me, it's a no-brainer, if that's what the Jets are looking for.

1. How about planet age and contract? Planet RFA vs. UFA? The whopping 12 points don't make up for 4 years and 3.5 million / year.

2. 'Age doesn't matter when you're talking about 19 and 22, it's a wash'? That is a huge, huge difference. That is three years of an ELC contract on an ELC salary difference. That is controlling the most important development years of a defenseman in the NHL for almost league minimum.

I think we'd agree that the only way this deal is 'better' than the Bruins and not equal to (didn't address the Bruins 1st potentially being a lottery pick while the Rangers are set for another playoff run, which equates to potentially 10 spots in the draft) is if Zuccarello and his 29 year old 3.5 million dollar cap hit then UFA contract is replaced with Miller's. Then you have an argument like you suggested.

Certainly not 'easily' beating the Bruins offer when age, contract status, salary cap and draft position are taken into account.

Miller, LHD and 1st address more needs than Spooner, younger RHD, higher 1st for the Jets IMO.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad