Nylanderthal
Registered User
- Jun 9, 2010
- 7,901
- 6,252
Pretty similar to my thoughts when I see your header as I scroll down my screen. Gosh this clown again, wish he’d go awayMommy……make it go away.
Pretty similar to my thoughts when I see your header as I scroll down my screen. Gosh this clown again, wish he’d go awayMommy……make it go away.
A common theme over most of the successful teams in recent memory was that they had big, mean lineups. Maybe not 30 fight teams. But, they were equipped for a long grinding playoff run. Dubas just does not understand this philosophy. He is refusing to adapt. After this move I don't really think he plans on addressing it. I'm almost done with him, give me Francis.
You know there are options at your disposal to not see posts, they’re a good option for those only interested in like minded opinions.Pretty similar to my thoughts when I see your header as I scroll down my screen. Gosh this clown again, wish he’d go away
He’s not better tho, different yea, but he’s not better and not better in the things we’re looking for now.
Kerfoots the better two way player and playoff performer.
I don’t see how anyone can be upset at this, we capped our XD losses to a middling prospect and a 7th.
I saw a lot of McCann the last 2 seasons. I would have preferred him to Kerfoot. Even if I assume it's a wash, IMO, it's poor asset value to spend Hallander to keep Kerfoot. I hope I'm wrong.
It wasn't to protect Kerfoot. It was to protect Holl and mitigate the loss of a forward at the cost of the Leafs 4th best LW prospect.What the actual f***. So Dubas traded a prospect to a team to get a player that by all accounts is better than Kerfoot, so he could keep Kerfoot?
My god. I am a bit shocked at this.
Yes, it really makes little sense. Hopefully it will one day.What the actual f***. So Dubas traded a prospect to a team to get a player that by all accounts is better than Kerfoot, so he could keep Kerfoot?
My god. I am a bit shocked at this.
I agree I am more than ok with them selecting McCann over Kerfoot. We dont need any change for the sake of change. Eliminating Kerfoot makes the team weaker. I am fine with McCann leaving.
It wasn't to protect Kerfoot. It was to protect Holl and mitigate the loss of a forward at the cost of the Leafs 4th best LW prospect.
Mitigation strategy for that loss either way. A bird in the hand is always better as you have zero control over UFA's, and if Bogo is any indication.....Canadian teams will not be a hot destination due to the restrictions that may or may not be in place.Is Holl really worth that kind of protection? What happened to just losing Kerfoot and finding another 3C or slotting McCann there?
Holl is essentially worth McCann, Hallander and a 7th to the Leafs lol
Mitigation strategy for that loss either way. A bird in the hand is always better as you have zero control over UFA's, and if Bogo is any indication.....Canadian teams will not be a hot destination due to the restrictions that may or may not be in place.
Kerfoot - once his bonus is paid - is only owed $750K for this season, and $3.45 million cash total over the next 2 seasons....or roughly what McCann is getting for this season alone. That is a very overlooked aspect of this....the Leafs aren't wedded to Kerfoot.
Sure. Regardless, tough decision from the Leafs.So many people dont understand how this trade works.
If I trade a 2nd for player A, then trade player A for player B, then B for C, that doesn't mean player C is worth a 2nd + player A + player B (which is what you are implying).
The net loss in assets from last week to this week is Hallander and a 7th. If you think Holl is worth less than McCann and Kerfoot so we shouldn't have protected him, that's a different argument but it doesn't change the value of who we lost from our roster.
He’s not better tho, different yea, but he’s not better and not better in the things we’re looking for now.
Kerfoots the better two way player and playoff performer.
I don’t see how anyone can be upset at this, we capped our XD losses to a middling prospect and a 7th.
This. McCann feasted on PP time with geno and Sid. He wasn’t likely going to be afforded that opportunity if here. Kerfoots the better player in pretty much every other facet of the game, plus he seems to be well liked in the room.Kerfoot may still be dealt (especially if Seattle is as high on him as rumored), and the only thing that I preferred McCann over Kerfoot was his shot on the PP, but, Galchenyk has a great one timer, and we pretty much didnt use him, so, what chance would McCann have gotten anyways
Holl isn’t replaceable for his cap hit. Holl is a solid if unspectacular #4D. If he did the things people complained about at a better rate he’d be a #2.That's not really the issue though. Idk why some are complaining about losing McCann over Kerfoot when that's not the problem/mistake Dubas made here. Protecting Holl over McCann just seems dumb, especially when we could've went 7-3-1. Our defence is fine and Muzzin can make his partners look good. Sometimes too good apparently because now people and apparently our management/staff think he's a top 4 d man when he isn't. Our problem was scoring. Our stars on our 1st line keep getting shut down and our 3rd line didn't even get a point I believe which McCann could help with. Hell, if they are that worried about it why not target Demelo in a trade. I'm sure they could use a guy like Kerfoot and if we want to trade Kerfoot it has to be this year since he has a NTC for his final year.
If this occurs, things would make a lot more sense.And Kerfoot would almost certainly receive more in a trade than Hallander + a 7th.
Holl isn’t replaceable for his cap hit. Holl is a solid if unspectacular #4D. If he did the things people complained about at a better rate he’d be a #2.
4-4-1 was always the way to go.
Well he’s certainly not a cap dump, requiring multiple assets to off-load as some on here suggestIf this occurs, things would make a lot more sense.
Holl is essentially worth McCann, Hallander and a 7th to the Leafs lol