Trades and UFA’s - Trade Deadline Edition

Status
Not open for further replies.

rumman

Registered User
Sep 10, 2008
16,454
12,837
My gut feeling is we're going to trade Brodie, 1st + prospect for a retained Parayko.
why not, besides the cap space and term Parayko appears to still have gas in the tank, but Peeke is still a intriguing cheap alternative imo............

We need depth up front. Duclair would be tidy business, in that regard
maybe a larger deal with the Blues, they have some interesting forwards to package with Parayko.........
 

Rude Dog

Registered User
Dec 22, 2008
4,319
3,431
I am going to go against the grain and proclaim that Edmundson is going to be a decent add on the blue line. I like the idea of making it painful for anyone who feels the need to drive the Leafs net. Really wish they would have added Gudas last year. Too bad he didn't want to come here.

A 1st for Savard would have killed me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TMLAM34

stats1

Registered User
Jul 22, 2022
2,671
2,497
St.Louis doesn’t want to retain on Parayko so you try to get them to bite on taking Brodie, you flip them Minten a first and whatever else it takes.
 

GQS

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
3,714
2,479
If Brad can pull off Buchnevich and Parayko deal, I'll imagine we'll name schools after him.
Of course Brad can pull that kind of trade off. The question is at what price? As nice as those players are, I'd rather not we give up our best prospects/young players and what little picks we have for them.
 

Sypher04

Registered User
Jan 20, 2011
12,747
11,581
St.Louis doesn’t want to retain on Parayko so you try to get them to bite on taking Brodie, you flip them Minten a first and whatever else it takes.

It makes sense. Most teams aren’t going to be interested in retaining on a player for 5 years. Especially so if they don’t need to move the player.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad