rumman
Registered User
- Sep 10, 2008
- 16,454
- 12,837
trade/waive Brodie, Lagesson still has potential..............I'd at least prefer that to trading away any of the lineup fixtures.
He better be retained cus that contract is pure trashParayko
for
Brodie + Niemela + 2024 1st (Top-5 protected)
St. Louis then fires off Brodie at 50% retained for a 2nd + good prospect.
A third party is also likely needed. Dare I say kings?Yeah that ain't happening by tomorrow
why not, besides the cap space and term Parayko appears to still have gas in the tank, but Peeke is still a intriguing cheap alternative imo............My gut feeling is we're going to trade Brodie, 1st + prospect for a retained Parayko.
maybe a larger deal with the Blues, they have some interesting forwards to package with Parayko.........We need depth up front. Duclair would be tidy business, in that regard
Tomorrow isn't today. There's also the possibility that Lagesson isn't claimed and ultimately lost to the organization.trade/waive Brodie, Lagesson still has potential..............
This. And if trading Brodie to recoup some picks.Edmunson makes more sense if they’re going for a Parayko/Buch deal involving Lily
This ^ Brad is cooking on something elseEdmunson makes more sense if they’re going for a Parayko/Buch deal involving Lily
Thanks Brad. I think it’s more of you hope it doesn’t happen by tomorrowYeah that ain't happening by tomorrow
Of course Brad can pull that kind of trade off. The question is at what price? As nice as those players are, I'd rather not we give up our best prospects/young players and what little picks we have for them.If Brad can pull off Buchnevich and Parayko deal, I'll imagine we'll name schools after him.
St.Louis doesn’t want to retain on Parayko so you try to get them to bite on taking Brodie, you flip them Minten a first and whatever else it takes.
This. And if trading Brodie to recoup some picks.
Thanks Brad. I think it’s more of you hope it doesn’t happen by tomorrow