Trades and UFA’s - Trade Deadline Edition

[Leaffan1991]

Double retention, Treliving will likely need to do the same as well to get a D

 

[Punch Drunk Loov]

Makes no sense for the Flames to prefer to trade with someone in their conference than the Leafs. We're not rivals

 

[mydnyte]

Now for me its Carrier out of the definitely available guys. Or swing for the fences and pay a ton for someone not really available like a Pulock/Weegar. Not sure there's many more RHDs who actually move the needle much.

Puloch would be a championship defining pickup.
Weegar was offered to us at least twice, and for some reason, Dubas wasnt interested.
Larsson would be my #2 target after Puloch

on the less expensive side Borgen

 

[rumman]

Moving on to the other D out there.
Roy
Walker
Seeler
Carrier
Savard

Peeke
Borgen

 

[ULF_55]

Makes no sense for the Flames to prefer to trade with someone in their conference than the Leafs. We're not rivals

Perhaps Tanev hasn't really been a target of Treliving?

 

[ULF_55]

Puloch would be a championship defining pickup.
Weegar was offered to us at least twice, and for some reason, Dubas wasnt interested.
Larsson would be my #2 target after Puloch

on the less expensive side Borgen

Flames aren't retaining for 7 years on Weeger.

So, unless it is Hanifin or Andersson don't see Flames in it with Leafs now.

 

[notdoneyet]

Can't complain at all about any current lineup fixture earning just under 800K. I was only stating that any comparison of potentially acquiring Peeke with the team's actual acquisition of Benoit might be a case of comparing apples and oranges.

My point is peeke is making more and it will cost us capital
To acquire him and I don’t think he is as good as Benoit

 

[MilkofthePoppy]

Puloch would be a championship defining pickup.
Weegar was offered to us at least twice, and for some reason, Dubas wasnt interested.
Larsson would be my #2 target after Puloch

on the less expensive side Borgen

Weegar sucks.

 

[Kurtz]

Soooo...swing for Parayko? I know he hasn't looked good this year, but he's only 30 and at his best is one of the better defensive dmen in the league and has no issue logging 23+ minutes/game. Also a cup winner, which we don't have on the roster.

We'd also be buying low I think due to his poor play this year, but he's a prime bounce-back candidate...and if he does bounce back, $6.5m is a bargain for a legit first pairing RHD.

Blues won't retain so we'd have to send back some salary, which might be tricky.

 

[Warden of the North]

You just know we're going to give up our 1st for someone not as good.

 

[stats1]

The way the media in this city frames things is wild. So depending on what Treliving does will tell everyone how far he thinks this team will go??? Nothing to do with the prices or who was available in relation to the market prices. So glad Treliving didn’t make that deal. Definitely would’ve cost us our first.

Go get Larsson who is not only younger but has term and can actually move the puck. The issue in the playoffs for us is we get hemmed in and have guys like Schenn who can’t move with the puck

 

[Stephen]

You just know we're going to give up our 1st for someone not as good.

Hopefully there’s someone we can get who is worth a 1st and has some term.

 

[WTFMAN99]

Hopefully there’s someone we can get who is worth a 1st and has some term.

Would you trade it for Roy w/ an extension?

 

[Punch Drunk Loov]

Manifesting Rasmus Andersson

 

[OVO16]

You just know we're going to give up our 1st for someone not as good.

If we weren't giving ur 1st for Tanev, then no chance we just give it to someone worse.

Im glad we didnt get tanev. That dude is one block shot away from retirement.

 

[nuck]

Double retention, Treliving will likely need to do the same as well to get a D

Walker is $2.65 and Carrier is $2.5. I don't beleive they are looking at Borgen but if they were, $2.7. Tanev was the priciest of the RD rentals.

 

[Jacquestrapless]

Imagine

 

[Commander Clueless]

Well....that sucks.

I know we were all nervous about the price but darn if Tanev wouldn't have looked good on this team.

 

[1specter]

Makes no sense for the Flames to prefer to trade with someone in their conference than the Leafs. We're not rivals

The owner is petty as hell and seems to not want to deal with Tre.

 

[Gabriel426]

Perhaps Tanev hasn't really been a target of Treliving?

Thats what I think too.

 

[Stephen]

Would you trade it for Roy w/ an extension?

Yeah I might. Depends on the extension. Matt Roy us like a RHD McCabe basically right?

 

[WTFMAN99]

Yeah I might. Depends on the extension. Matt Roy us like a RHD McCabe basically right?

His PK numbers are far better which is appealing.

 

[Evilhomer]

You just know we're going to give up our 1st for someone not as good.

I think the more likely conclusion is that the Leafs will only give up that pick for someone with term left on his contract.

 

[Menzinger]

Positively I think this deal will have a positive impact for buyers on the market.

That said seems more likely than ever that the Flames would rather not deal with Tre if they don't have to (remember Leafs also looked at Zadorov who they opted to trade elsewhere for fairly cheap).

Leafs tdl move(s) likely will be elsewhere....

 

[Apex Predator]

Imagine

How has Holl been this year?

I think the leafs end up standing pat.