TheShape
Registered User
- Oct 25, 2018
- 2,737
- 3,301
I would agree, but the only thing is I don't know who we could have got.
I am not a fan of that Markstrom contract and would rather give Campbell a chance. Lehner has been iffy so far too, and he wanted to stay in Vegas. Holtby has been bad. Murray has been worse.
You are pretty much down to Allen, Dubnyk, and Talbot... And giving Andersen a second chance was probably a better option.
At least with Andersen you get out of the contract and you are not saddled with anything going forward, especially with expansion potentially making some good goalies available. It just sucks that he had to be this bad, which was unimaginable even with last year's play. Even last year's play would probably give us a comfortable lead in the division right now.
I agree the UFA market was thin, but this was about the 3rd-4th chance for Andersen here? Dubas probably felt with bolstering the D it would lessen the workload on Andersen, but Freddy's problem as we all know is mental. The tighter the game, the smaller he gets.
I just think the team needed a different look back there and Dubas failed in that regard. Holtby has been bad yes, but maybe behind our defense he looks at least average? Arizona are a cash strapped team with 3 goalies, neither Kuemper or Raanta have much term. Vegas were literally trying to give away Fleury. There were some options out there.
I don't know if Campbell is the answer going forward but he is the better goalie, season is a write off if he can't stay healthy.