Dekes For Days
Registered User
- Sep 24, 2018
- 22,095
- 16,633
He barely even played with Kessel in 2012-2013. His most common linemates were Macarthur and Kulemin,, and he had that production level because he had a crazy lucky OISH% in a shortened season where it didn't have a chance to normalize. He actually played with Kessel more in the next couple seasons, when he had his normal 50 point seasons. Kadri produced a certain way in 9 out of the past 10 seasons, and that is what he is. There is absolutely nothing about his situation in 2021-2022 that was meaningfully different from previous or future seasons, and there's absolutely nothing about his situation in 2021-2022 that can come close to causing a +50-point explosion.The 2 seasons he got to play with Kessel he put up good seasons for his 1st 2 full time seasons as a Leaf.
We're talking about the impacts that teams that win cups have gotten from their second best center in those years.We're talking about players who have won cups being the 2C for those cup runs
You're focusing on the individuals, but that's not the point. The point is that every single cup winner had a better performance from their second best center than what Kadri could be relied on to consistently bring, meaning that he was not an "ideal cup caliber 2C" (which would mean consistently providing that level of impact), and it was reasonable to pursue an available upgrade that would make center a comparative strength instead of weakness.
In comparisons of the Kadri that was being decided on by Toronto and the worst performances of second best centers on cup winners in recent history, it's more like the special teams cancel out, and then Kadri still falls behind in 5v5 production, defensive play, and suspensions.Alright, Cirelli is the better defender and PKer but Kadri is the better offensive player and PP guy. Pretty much cancels out don't you think?
Just because you don't win the cup, it doesn't mean every decision you make is a failure, or that some specified alternative route would have been better.I didn't have a problem with them looking to upgrade the position, especially with Tavares available. It's just we can now look back on it seeing that it has failed and what has screwed us has been depth scoring which we could've paid for keeping Kadri instead for those 3 years
And depth scoring struggles in the playoffs isn't about signing Tavares. It's more about what happened across the league and world after we signed Tavares, the offense-hindering situations we've experienced in the playoffs, the bad non-lottery drafting through our rebuild and rise (not to mention things like our highest drafted recent prospect getting cancer), and the anchors that were left to solve with internal assets. We still would have had to trade Kadri after his 2nd straight playoff suspension.