hockeynorth
Registered User
- Aug 31, 2017
- 12,649
- 6,439
The same can be said for many of the incumbent players so far this season.
Yeah no to all 3 of these.3 possible trades to shake up the core and change the culture.
Mangiapane for Nylander is an easy place to start. I proposed this multiple times this summer. They scored at the same rate last year. Nylander is a better playmaker, Mangiapane is a better defensive player. Calgary needs offense, Toronto needs more tenacity. Leafs save 1M on the cap for the next two years and get a third year.
Rielly for Lowry would be smart business. Rielly is being paid like a #1 defenseman but he is quite literally terrible at defense. Dubas would be smart to move on from his money while he still can. Everything that Rielly brings can be replaced by free agents for cheap. Leafs save 4.25M for the next 4 seasons.
Marner for Dobson might fix the 1RD position for the next 10 years. Leafs save 7M on the cap for the next 3 years while picking up one of the best young RHD. Marner is obviously a huge price to pay but it's much more difficult to find young top pair RHD than it is to find point per game wingers. Leafs can use the 7M to backfill a large portion of Marner's production in UFA.
All three trades are a loss of value in a vacuum but the Leafs save cap on all 3 while picking up players that play a different style.
3 possible trades to shake up the core and change the culture.
Mangiapane for Nylander is an easy place to start. I proposed this multiple times this summer. They scored at the same rate last year. Nylander is a better playmaker, Mangiapane is a better defensive player. Calgary needs offense, Toronto needs more tenacity. Leafs save 1M on the cap for the next two years and get a third year.
Rielly for Lowry would be smart business. Rielly is being paid like a #1 defenseman but he is quite literally terrible at defense. Dubas would be smart to move on from his money while he still can. Everything that Rielly brings can be replaced by free agents for cheap. Leafs save 4.25M for the next 4 seasons.
Marner for Dobson might fix the 1RD position for the next 10 years. Leafs save 7M on the cap for the next 3 years while picking up one of the best young RHD. Marner is obviously a huge price to pay but it's much more difficult to find young top pair RHD than it is to find point per game wingers. Leafs can use the 7M to backfill a large portion of Marner's production in UFA.
All three trades are a loss of value in a vacuum but the Leafs save cap on all 3 while picking up players that play a different style.
Explain to me why the rationalization for all three of these proposed moves is "nutso".All 3 moves would be big downgrades and make us a far worse team. And honestly, your rationalizations for these moves are nutso.
Gavrikov would be the best target, true shutdown physical dman. Still haunts me how amazing he was against us in the playoffs
And then who scores?3 possible trades to shake up the core and change the culture.
Mangiapane for Nylander is an easy place to start. I proposed this multiple times this summer. They scored at the same rate last year. Nylander is a better playmaker, Mangiapane is a better defensive player. Calgary needs offense, Toronto needs more tenacity. Leafs save 1M on the cap for the next two years and get a third year.
Rielly for Lowry would be smart business. Rielly is being paid like a #1 defenseman but he is quite literally terrible at defense. Dubas would be smart to move on from his money while he still can. Everything that Rielly brings can be replaced by free agents for cheap. Leafs save 4.25M for the next 4 seasons.
Marner for Dobson might fix the 1RD position for the next 10 years. Leafs save 7M on the cap for the next 3 years while picking up one of the best young RHD. Marner is obviously a huge price to pay but it's much more difficult to find young top pair RHD than it is to find point per game wingers. Leafs can use the 7M to backfill a large portion of Marner's production in UFA.
All three trades are a loss of value in a vacuum but the Leafs save cap on all 3 while picking up players that play a different style.
This is a good question. I didn't mean to imply that all 3 of those moves together is the way to go. I think either of them on there own would shake up the core. If the Leafs did execute all 3 they would be looking atAnd then who scores?
Agreed. Cant make a desperation trade now, you're gonna lose it.Meh a knee jerk reaction trade isn’t what’s needed now. The issues run deeper than that. Let the core drown this team and look to shake it up in the off-season, while drafting as high as you can.
Meh a knee jerk reaction trade isn’t what’s needed now. The issues run deeper than that. Let the core drown this team and look to shake it up in the off-season, while drafting as high as you can.
Making a stupid trade because we are desperate would make our situation worse not better
I wouldn't fire the coach, this core has already quit on one and going through an endless cycle of coach firings isn't going to solve our problems either
If they continue to suck don't invest in them, sell at the deadline, get the highest pick possible and let's try to inject this organization with new talent while Matthews is still in his prime
Meh a knee jerk reaction trade isn’t what’s needed now. The issues run deeper than that. Let the core drown this team and look to shake it up in the off-season, while drafting as high as you can.
To be honest, I'd definitely punt players right now to bring in a couple Marlies. Will anybody want them? Who knows.
Making a stupid trade because we are desperate would make our situation worse not better
I wouldn't fire the coach, this core has already quit on one and going through an endless cycle of coach firings isn't going to solve our problems either
If they continue to suck don't invest in them, sell at the deadline, get the highest pick possible and let's try to inject this organization with new talent while Matthews is still in his prime
Not necessarily advocating for a kneejerk deal, but if one had to be made, I'd look at dealing Kerfoot first. He seems well enmeshed in the room, so it would likely be a 'shock' to the system, while at the same time he's replaceable (arguably Jarnkrok is his replacement one year early) and kind of meh all-around. Agreed that any Big 4 trade needs to wait until the off-season (for a wider array of potential suitors if nothing else).
To be honest, I'd definitely punt players right now to bring in a couple Marlies. Will anybody want them? Who knows.
Maybe the right punishment is to do nothing and let them live with it through all 82. You can turn off the games. They still have to play them.