Bunting-Matthews-Jarnkrok
Robertson-Tavares-Marner
Engvall-Kerfoot-Nylander
Aston Reese-Kampf-ZAR
Rielly-Brodie
Giordano-Mete
Sandin-Holl
That's the lineup they should be rolling
Bunting - Matthews - Marner
Malgin/Robertson - Tavares - Nylander
Malgin/Robertson - Kerfoot - Jarnkrok
Engvall - Kampf - NAK/ZAR
Is how I would have done it personally. Tavares-Nylander have been strong together. I would have kept Malgin with them and let Robertson go to a line where he would have been more of the focal point but I would have trusted Keefe's decision either way. I think you give the top line some more time to start converting and gaining their focus. The underlying numbers for them have been a lot better than the conversion rates and eye-test.
Seems like Keefe is just doing a straight Robertson for Malgin swap, which will solve absolutely nothing if that is what he intended to do. Seems like this is nothing more than a goodwill gesture for Robertson to play against his brother.
At least Simmonds is not playing.
God... our RD depth is troubling.
Yeah no shit..jesus try somethingI am kind of getting sick of Keefe these days. Nothing inventive. I think the guys are tuning him out as well.
I am kind of getting sick of Keefe these days. Nothing inventive. I think the guys are tuning him out as well.
I think some consideration needs to be given to the fact that 2/3 of our 4th line are new to the team, the system, and each other, before we discard them.
Factor in it's 5 games in, and they have around 30 minutes of game play experience with each other, and we may want to cut them a bit of slack.
We've got a lot more concerning problems going on in our roster and game-play before I start to point my fingers at what the 4th line is/isn't doing.
When Spezza and Simmonds were on the 4th line, I noticed them doing something useful every game.I think some consideration needs to be given to the fact that 2/3 of our 4th line are new to the team, the system, and each other, before we discard them.
Factor in it's 5 games in, and they have around 30 minutes of game play experience with each other, and we may want to cut them a bit of slack.
We've got a lot more concerning problems going on in our roster and game-play before I start to point my fingers at what the 4th line is/isn't doing.
I wouldn’t say something useful every game, but when needed they’d step up and do something to help change the momentum. It’s a small sample size but the fourth line sure hasn’t been able to really do anything.When Spezza and Simmonds were on the 4th line, I noticed them doing something useful every game.
Especially when leadership and toughness were needed. The new look 4th line is trash at everything
No, he does not. We know what Malgin is. He's done nothing in the NHL, and yet we keep acting like the league would be knocking down the doors to have him. ZAR and NAK have an NHL body of work that shows they are capable. Not comparing apples to apples here.......So does Malgin not deserve the same amount of patience?
I am more than fine with giving the 4th line more time to figure their game out. They have been really bad, but they are also only the 4th line and is has only been 4 games.
At the same time, if we are making changes in our lineup at this point, that is where they should be.
I think you are exaggerating here.When Spezza and Simmonds were on the 4th line, I noticed them doing something useful every game.
Especially when leadership and toughness were needed. The new look 4th line is trash at everything
Pierre-Olivier Joseph is apparently available. With Muzzin now injured, I wonder if Dubas has any interest in him? Big body, can skate and move the puck. Maybe something around Steeves going the other way considering he looks NHL ready but isn’t really being given the opportunity.
Malgin reminds me of Vessey during the Covid season.So does Malgin not deserve the same amount of patience?
I am more than fine with giving the 4th line more time to figure their game out. They have been really bad, but they are also only the 4th line and is has only been 4 games.
At the same time, if we are making changes in our lineup at this point, that is where they should be.
I've thought ZAR and Samsanov have both been good.Every off season acquisition is off to a dogshit start. Not even a single skater seems remotely serviceable. Maybe samsonov is ok.
F's all around to them.
Murphy + Toews double retained with the likes of Kerfoot, NAK, Holl getting shipped out would be great
Based solely on those stats (I know, I know), JT is the one who should be demoted to the fourth line, rather than Engvall.Sure, they look bad in this context, but it's not the entire story. I'm not saying they've been good or bad, just that the stats are missing a lot of information (zone starts, opposition, limited minutes, etc.).
Maybe if somebody added the other context it looks the same or is different, but it's not wise to judge just based on this one stat alone.
I agree in theory with Engvall being demoted to the 4th line if Robetson comes in, but I think our 4th line has more to offer than what we've seen so far.
Not sure if you spelled AM incorrectly?Based solely on those stats (I know, I know), JT is the one who should be demoted to the fourth line, rather than Engvall.
Murphy + Toews double retained with the likes of Kerfoot, NAK, Holl getting shipped out would be great
Works for me. Not worth what it would take to get him, and then watch him walk as a UFA.Kane may not accept a trade to the Leafs. If I'm betting he is going to the Rangers.
View attachment 596018
If you looked at the particular stat referenced (post 697), you would see that Matthews had the best and, other than the three fourth-lines, Tavares had the worst. So no, I didn't misspell anything.Not sure if you spelled AM incorrectly?