Fogelhund
Registered User
- Sep 15, 2007
- 24,179
- 29,204
Oops. Misread.while your point is valid - reinhart is a whole tier below william.
Oops. Misread.while your point is valid - reinhart is a whole tier below william.
If Florida is in desperate need to clear out some salary, Reinhart is a guy I wouldn’t mind slotting into our top six.
To Toronto: Sam Reinhart
To Florida: Alex Kerfoot + Ryan Tverberg + 2025 3rd Round Draft Pick
Removing Reinhart and inserting Kerfoot and Duclair (back from injury), the salaries are exactly equal helping Florida stay under the salary cap.
Nylander - Matthews - Reinhart
Bunting - Tavares - Marner
Top six.
For me, the only guy that ARI has that really excites me is Hayton as a guy we can get for a discount.
Chychrun and Crouse are overrated and cost a lot more than they are worth.
If Washington continues to struggle, Martha is an intriguing name.
Conor Sheary could be a cheap option too if big names are too pricey.
I wanted Mantha pretty bad a couple years ago. He’s got all the tools to be a very good player but for whatever reason he can’t really put it all together.If Washington continues to struggle, Martha is an intriguing name.
Conor Sheary could be a cheap option too if big names are too pricey.
That's fair. Reliable players for sure but I think the Leafs and the amount of cap space they can put in, it's probably a better option to go after more capable players. Bjugstad hasn't put up over 40 points in 5-6 years and only once reached 20 goals almost a decade ago. Laughton never has. Boyd never has. They provide intangibles and probably other good things in lower roles though.
We'll see in a few months how things shape up though because a lot of things can change between now and then, I agree.
I wanted Mantha pretty bad a couple years ago. He’s got all the tools to be a very good player but for whatever reason he can’t really put it all together.
Hes the last type of player we need.. we already tried the over the hill overpayment for a "vet presence"... we need talent that can generate some semblence of offenseDon’t get me wrong. I think someone like Toews is a great fit. I’m an advocate on spending assets on the Center position. Holmgren looks good, and we should find a spot for him next year, but improving the third line would make us such a more dangerous team. Toews on the first line leading a team obviously above his ability now, but on the third line? That’s money.
If we can figure out a way to make the cap work, I’m all for it.
It’s just I don’t think this management team will, nor do I think we necessarily need too
Hes the last type of player we need.. we already tried the over the hill overpayment for a "vet presence"... we need talent that can generate some semblence of offense
Especially on a rental
Hes the last type of player we need.. we already tried the over the hill overpayment for a "vet presence"... we need talent that can generate some semblence of offense
Especially on a rental
Friedman in his 32 thoughs:
"7. Toronto’s on an excellent run despite a banged-up defence and goaltending that just recently returned to full health. The Maple Leafs are fourth in the NHL just weeks after we had the entire organization looking for new jobs. They have time to let this play out, but it’s safe to say they will save their best assets for whatever they feel they might need on the blueline. There’s the possibility of adding a left-shot scorer, but that’s not the priority and I think they’d also like to show Matthew Knies there’s a path when he’s ready to leave NCAA Minnesota. "
Seems crazy to me that they still want a defenseman. I assume they think the banged up D will falter or something?
Agreed, we badly need a depth scoring forward, or a sparkplug type player.I'm not sure why that's the priority, the 4 guys we have playing top 4 minutes now seem to be showing there ready to shoulder more responsibility and when Rielly and Brodie get back were going to have 6 guys I'd be comfortable playing in our top 4
I think the lack of a cutting edge in the bottom 6 forward group would be my first priority and I don't think it will cost as much to sort out either
Comfortable with them in November is different than comfortable with them come playoff time.I'm not sure why that's the priority, the 4 guys we have playing top 4 minutes now seem to be showing there ready to shoulder more responsibility and when Rielly and Brodie get back were going to have 6 guys I'd be comfortable playing in our top 4
I think the lack of a cutting edge in the bottom 6 forward group would be my first priority and I don't think it will cost as much to sort out either
Agreed, we badly need a depth scoring forward, or a sparkplug type player.
I just don't see anybody out there that's significantly better than the 6 guys we already have, unfortunately most of the pending UFA'S are puck movers with questionable defensive gamesComfortable with them in November is different than comfortable with them come playoff time.
I definitely look at that blueline and think it needs at least one quality top 4 add.
At the same time, do you spend significant assets on a premium position when there is a ton of high-quality top 4 UFA D this summer?
The type of defender Chychrun is (high end young top 4 dman with term and a bargain cap hit), I would imagine he is still the Plan A as far as non-rentals go.Friedman in his 32 thoughs:
"7. Toronto’s on an excellent run despite a banged-up defence and goaltending that just recently returned to full health. The Maple Leafs are fourth in the NHL just weeks after we had the entire organization looking for new jobs. They have time to let this play out, but it’s safe to say they will save their best assets for whatever they feel they might need on the blueline. There’s the possibility of adding a left-shot scorer, but that’s not the priority and I think they’d also like to show Matthew Knies there’s a path when he’s ready to leave NCAA Minnesota. "
Seems crazy to me that they still want a defenseman. I assume they think the banged up D will falter or something?
If Washington continues to struggle, Martha is an intriguing name.
Depending on the cost, it wouldn’t be a bad addition. He’s got a good shot, he’s big and fast, plays the wing and signed for another year after this season. If they expect anything close to what they paid for him, that’s definitely a no go.Well he had a shoulder injury that knocked him out of most of last year .. which is always a concern with a powerforward .. but he has had modest production this year .. 2 years left @ $5.7 mill though.
Couldn't resist.
What do we think it takes to get Toews, though? Requires heavy retention and all.
Toews is 34, not 38, and still plays pretty well. 13 points so far this season, in 21 games, and 64% in the dot. I'd only have interest, if he would extend below $ 4 mil.