I wonder if we are suddenly in market for a goalie with Dorion comments the other day mentioning they are looking at everything.
Demko seems to be available.
Demko would cost an arm and a leg.
I wonder if we are suddenly in market for a goalie with Dorion comments the other day mentioning they are looking at everything.
Demko seems to be available.
Since when does any goalie cost an arm and a leg?Demko would cost an arm and a leg.
Maybe it boils down to the definition of rebuild, but what would you say we are doing?
We need a goalie, a RD, and not sure about Debrincat next year, but might have another hole in the top 6 to fill as well. We occupy the 25th seed (8th worst).
Not sure whether its a rebuild or some other term, but we are definitely needing to make several additional moves before we can have realistic hopes of making the playoffs and doing something once we are in.
Appreciate your feedback. If you say we need a goalie, a RD, and possibly another top 6 forward, I'm not sure if the rebuild isn't still happening. I wouldn't say those are complimentary pieces, but I suppose we're back into terminology again.I replied to bert before with a longer explanation, but my definition of our team currently is that we’re past the rebuild phase and currently evaluating if the core that we’ve built is good enough and are trying to complete the needs of the team like with a legit goalie and complementary pieces like an RD and another top 9 F.
When your entire core is locked up long term for the most part for me you’re past the stage of “rebuild”, but that’s just how I see it.
Since when does any goalie cost an arm and a leg?
Since when does any goalie cost an arm and a leg?
Ottawa has needed a #1 goalie they can depend on since forever, the last one or only one in their history that I can remember was Hasek. Everyone else let us down usually in the playoffs including Hasek who wouldn't return soon enough due to injury.
Need:
- #1 goalie they can depend on (off season move)
- a top 4 RD (maybe a TDL move)
- 4 bottom six forwards (these potentially can be had internally in time)
He has the best Senators career no doubt, but he was also subject to his own ups and downs that were a bit frustrating at times.Craig Anderson? Literally the best goalie in franchise history
If you say so, it's a case where he was here for a long time, but we never got by the Conference finals with him & were lucky to get that far. And wasn't it because of a couple of runs with the Hamburgler & someone else the real reason we got that far? Emery got us to the Cup finals at least.Craig Anderson? Literally the best goalie in franchise history
It was that whole hot and cold/injuries thing with Anderson. Just looking at his year to year save % with Ottawa tells a story of inconsistency.If you say so, it's a case where he was here for a long time, but we never got by the Conference finals with him & were lucky to get that far. And wasn't it because of a couple of runs with the Hamburgler & someone else the real reason we got that far? Emery got us to the Cup finals at least.
It was that whole hot and cold/injuries thing with Anderson. Just looking at his year to year save % with Ottawa tells a story of inconsistency.
.939
.913
.941
.911
.923
.916
.926
.898
.903
.902
And the wraparounds. My god, the wraparounds. To have such a significant weakness was a bit odd.
I could see that, but I would say more like a tremendous season followed by a pretty average season year on year which can be an issue in itself. I lived it so regardless of specifics, I remember it as an issue in my mind anyways. Could be wrong and admittedly was not a big fan. I specifically remember the .941 season thinking we had the best tender in the league and that we were about to build on that, but his inconsistency was an issue the following year.That looks like 7 very good years in a row followed by a decline 17/18, which coincided with the implosion of the entire team.
That looks like 7 very good years in a row followed by a decline 17/18, which coincided with the implosion of the entire team.
And the wraparounds. My god, the wraparounds. To have such a significant weakness was a bit odd.
I'd say it was comical but iirc it often happened at the worst times.I think every Sens fan who watched during the Anderson era has PTSD from some of those wraparound goals. I still get nervous whenever an opposing player starts to drive hard behind the net. My brain automatically responds with fear.
Love Andy, but man it was like watching a trainwreck in slow motion lol.
If you say so, it's a case where he was here for a long time, but we never got by the Conference finals with him & were lucky to get that far. And wasn't it because of a couple of runs with the Hamburgler & someone else the real reason we got that far? Emery got us to the Cup finals at least.
I think every Sens fan who watched during the Anderson era has PTSD from some of those wraparound goals. I still get nervous whenever an opposing player starts to drive hard behind the net. My brain automatically responds with fear.
Love Andy, but man it was like watching a trainwreck in slow motion lol.
Anderson is one of the best playoff goalies of the past 20 years. He beat prime Price, Lundqvist, and Rask. If Ottawa had Anderson in 2007, they would've had a much better chance at winning the cup. He was always clutch in the playoffs.If you say so, it's a case where he was here for a long time, but we never got by the Conference finals with him & were lucky to get that far. And wasn't it because of a couple of runs with the Hamburgler & someone else the real reason we got that far? Emery got us to the Cup finals at least.
Batherson against lower comp maybe notThat Pinto line is going to be caved in.
Lol inconsistency he was either incredible or just plain good. Except the 898 year.It was that whole hot and cold/injuries thing with Anderson. Just looking at his year to year save % with Ottawa tells a story of inconsistency.
.939
.913
.941
.911
.923
.916
.926
.898
.903
.902
And the wraparounds. My god, the wraparounds. To have such a significant weakness was a bit odd.
Those are fairly pedestrian numbers for a starter for the time. I guess good could apply. Average. Whatever you want to call it. I just think it caused some issues for the team to have a guy that was Vezina caliber one season with a significant drop off the next, then back up the year after.Lol inconsistency he was either incredible or just plain good. Except the 898 year.
I suppose he wasn’t consistently unbeatable.
Those are fairly pedestrian numbers for a starter for the time. I guess good could apply. Average. Whatever you want to call it. I just think it caused some issues for the team to have a guy that was Vezina caliber one season with a significant drop off the next, then back up the year after.
.928 sv% in 40 games with the sens, 21-18I’d be curious to see his playoff numbers with the Sens
I’d be curious to see his playoff numbers with the Sens