The idea that we shouldn't trade DeBrincat because we'd immediately be looking to replace him is bizarre to me.
If we trade him, presumably for a top 4 D that will be with the team for a while, it will be the first time we've had a legit top 4 group of D since .. what, 06-07 when we went to the SCF?
Seriously, go back and look for the last time we had a legit top 4, the next best we've had since 06-07 was with Ceci and broken down Phaneuf.
Now, what are the odds we can get another top 6 winger (not necessarily DeBrincat caliber) through our prospect pool, the draft, trade or UFA?
If we can trade DeBrincat, and get a guy like Pesce, it will be the best D Corps since going to the Cup finals, and we'll still have a stud #1C in Stü, a stud #2 C in Norris, a Stud Top line winger in Brady, a top tier winger in Batherson, an top tier vet winger in Giroux, a likely stud #3 C in Pinto or Greig,
What's easier to fill out, the depth up front, or a top 4 RHD? This really shouldn't be a hard choice, if you can get a top 4 RHD, DeBrincat is absolutely on the table. If the deal is right you got to make it.