He's not an upgrade over Brassard as a 3C
Eller can play the Wing too no?
He's not an upgrade over Brassard as a 3C
Eller can play the Wing too no?
Yeah, he's got size and some upside. I don't see why on earth the Habs would be looking to move him, though, and I'm not sure how much he adds to this team right now.
Rangers need team toughness (and not just a single guy). If Dylan would be ready (and I don't think he is), I'd trade DZ for a rugged 3rd liner (like Clutterbuck) and a draft pick.
This team lost a lot when they lost Prust and Dubinsky and I don't want to bring up that old tired debate again about how much $ they got and everything else. Those were 2 character guys that this team never recovered from losing.
lol did you forget DZ in the offer?
Does MTL like DZ?
https://twitter.com/PatrickCaisse/status/406807578849452032
Mowers is a Habs pro scout.
That team is loaded with long-term bloated contracts. Don't want or need.
Lars Eller.
Buff? I'd be all over that, though I don't see it happening.
This team needs just about everything. A #1 center, a top 6 LW that can score, a bottom 6 player to add some grit, a defenseman to add some toughness, a playmaking defenseman.
The roster deficiencies are as astounding as ever.
LOL. I can't wait to see how long it takes for Byfgulien to become Public Enemy #1 at the Garden once the fans get comfortable with the idea that besides shooting, he doesn't really do much of anything. Like, play defense or pass.
It's always a good idea to load up on guys that bad teams aren't willing to pay to keep around.
In this parity-era league every team has deficiencies. Welcome to the new NHL.
He's not an upgrade over Brassard as a 3C
Yeah, he was awful on that Cup winning Hawks team...
Besides, if we're talking shipping out MDZ and shipping in Buff, I don't see how that could possibly be a step backwards. MDZ is clearly done here and Buff is clearly done there.
Yeah, he was awful on that Cup winning Hawks team...
The good teams dont have deficiencies in nearly every area.
Dynamic players hide a lot of issues in the NHL. The Rangers have 2. Nash is as talented as they come, but seems to be missing the compete level to take him into the elite category -- I hope that changes. Lundqvist is world-class, but isn't playing up to his abilities this season. 1 dynamic position player - and hes a winger. This team is woeful down the middle.
He wasn't playing defense on that Hawks team.
The stacked team that got rid of him the following summer and remained a Cup contender, winning another Cup afterwards?
Besides take big shots, what else did he do? I watched most of their playoff run that season, I don't remember him doing much of anything else. Yeah, he's got a rocket for a shot, and he'll score some goals. He'll also singlehandedly give up quite a few of them, because he's a disaster defensively.
Would you say we got pushed around a bit yesterday?
Would you say, that besides his shot, a player like Buff would help with that?
I'd put him back on forward and utilize that shot. It's one of the things that beat us yesterday.
Again, if shipping out a player like MDZ brings in a player like Buff, I'm all for it. MDZ isn't playing anyway.
How would a player who is dumb, fat and lazy, help you with anything? Poor decisionmaker with the puck because he is a total shotwhore, awful positionally, and slow to get back in transition. It is one thing to be a shotwhore when you are Chara, and you are a brick wall in your own zone. It is another to fire away from the blueline and do nothing else.
I would say that, as usual, it is a lateral move at best that would solve one problem by creating another. In other words, typical Rangers.
Making lateral moves that don't create real progress is how the Rangers have become mired in mediocrity for years, one outlier season in 11-12 aside.
How would a player who is dumb, fat and lazy, help you with anything? Poor decisionmaker with the puck because he is a total shotwhore, awful positionally, and slow to get back in transition. It is one thing to be a shotwhore when you are Chara, and you are a brick wall in your own zone. It is another to fire away from the blueline and do nothing else.
I would say that, as usual, it is a lateral move at best that would solve one problem by creating another. In other words, typical Rangers.
Making lateral moves that don't create real progress is how the Rangers have become mired in mediocrity for years, one outlier season in 11-12 aside.