I would be okay with major changes happening. The team needs more skill and size. Investing in this core doesn't seem like it will lead to winning.
I agree with the need for roster changes.
But I think that doing the "right" things is more important than all of a sudden stumbling upon the perfect mix if you get what I mean.
My view is well known, but I just don't think we even remotely has been doing the right things the last 3.5 years. And its questionable if Renney his last years brought us in the right direction either (we were a little short on tempo with the puck).
Hence, I think I would rather remodel this core with 1 or 2 or 3 moves
than to open things up, get mobility to make bigger changes, and regroup for a couple of years.
I just think that there is -- alot -- of room in this league to accomplish something just by doing the right things. The level of competition is not high. I am so much more impressed with the "teams" Chicago and Boston than I am with the rosters of those teams. I mean you can get the players but what does that guarantee? What has Washington accomplished? Even Pittsburgh has done squat lately.
Also, I mean, if you miss a certain piece. A true no 1 center that can put you over the top for example, how are you more likely to get that player: (i) playing good hockey and than trading an established player doing really well for the said player, or (ii) sucking and drafting the kid to start with? You know I am not so sure the later option is even better than the former option if it comes to complete rebuild.
McD for example would today, undoubtedly, land us one of the top 10 offensive prospects/young NHLers if we put him on the market. We would get one of EDMs gems. Looking at the teams holding these kids, I definitely would expect one of them to open up and make one of them available for McD. McD don't develop like he have if we are in the same situation as say Florida has been the last handful of years...