Sterling Archer
Registered User
- Sep 26, 2006
- 23,323
- 14,060
So?While that’s true, literally no one drafted other than Mailloux has had an apologetic statement issued because they were drafted.
So?While that’s true, literally no one drafted other than Mailloux has had an apologetic statement issued because they were drafted.
The owner of the most prominent franchise in the league issued a statement that read (in part):
Don’t forget Weber’s contract is already all but offloadedAdding Bergeron & Letang on 2-3yr deals, assuming that also means Petry/Hoffman/Drouin are offloaded, would be a master stroke of roster building.
Those two decorated, cup proven, high character vets both are still playing at high quality, if borderline elite, top line play.
Relieves pressure on Suzuki, Wright, Romanov, Harris next few seasons, while being perfect mentors to help them (& Barron, Ghule & any other prospects that make the roster over next 2-3yrs) with the habits of being elite pros & finer details of dominant C/D.
It would take incredible GM work, but if Hughes made that cap swap (roughly 15M in, 16M out)
Bergeron will never sign for the Habs... or for any other teams than Boston.Adding Bergeron & Letang on 2-3yr deals, assuming that also means Petry/Hoffman/Drouin are offloaded, would be a master stroke of roster building.
Those two decorated, cup proven, high character vets both are still playing at high quality, if borderline elite, top line play.
Relieves pressure on Suzuki, Wright, Romanov, Harris next few seasons, while being perfect mentors to help them (& Barron, Ghule & any other prospects that make the roster over next 2-3yrs) with the habits of being elite pros & finer details of dominant C/D.
It would take incredible GM work, but if Hughes made that cap swap (roughly 15M in, 16M out)
Again, so? He’s still on the team is he not? Also, it’s tue team who’s helping him rehab his name and image too. They’ve already committed to him and taken their lumps. Doubt they move him now just because.The owner of the most prominent franchise in the league issued a statement that read (in part):
“This decision, made in the context of the draft, turned out to be instantaneously very offensive to many of you, I understand that you expect more from us and we let you down.”
Does that sound like someone who wants a lot of controversy? It reads to me like a guy who didn’t read the room that well originally and would be more than happy to Pontius Pilate himself of the player.
Free agency opens after the draft so they'd have no guarantee of signing Gaudreau before making the trade, which they definitely aren't making with Petry and Anderson as the main pieces for 2OADepends - if Gaudreau hits the market, NJD will without a doubt open the vault to sign their hometown boy. That becomes the W they’re looking to bring out the best in Hirschier, then it’s a question of what they want to add.
Making the playoff beat year seems to be the ownership mandate - would two established players do the trick? Petry + Anderson in some type of package involving 2OA?
I don’t know but there will be lots of moving pieces at play, starting w Johnny hockey situation at top of the list …
Bergeron has already publicly shot down the Habs rumours so not sure why this is even being floated as a possibilityAdding Bergeron & Letang on 2-3yr deals, assuming that also means Petry/Hoffman/Drouin are offloaded, would be a master stroke of roster building.
Those two decorated, cup proven, high character vets both are still playing at high quality, if borderline elite, top line play.
Relieves pressure on Suzuki, Wright, Romanov, Harris next few seasons, while being perfect mentors to help them (& Barron, Ghule & any other prospects that make the roster over next 2-3yrs) with the habits of being elite pros & finer details of dominant C/D.
It would take incredible GM work, but if Hughes made that cap swap (roughly 15M in, 16M out)
Well no he isn’t on the team and never was, he’s in the organization as a drafted player… they also would not be moving him “just because,” they’d be moving a package of players/prospects/picks for a player they liked more, while also shedding salary (also ensuring they’d be bad for the Bedard sweepstakes) and moving a potential distraction and a sore point for the organization.Again, so? He’s still on the team is he not? Also, it’s tue team who’s helping him rehab his name and image too. They’ve already committed to him and taken their lumps. Doubt they move him now just because.
Besides, I still don’t know what point you’re trying to make.
Too many good FAs. I wonder if Malkin and Letang chase the money or sign more reasonable deals with contenders?
What about Giroux?
Fiala being a RFA who can’t be re-signed is awfully attractive too. Wish we could get him.
Struble is a potential third pairing D, it seems unlikely that most teaks don't have a few of those.
No hes not lol i dont even see Struble making the NHL hes nothing special
He has zero value right now
Semantics. He's a member of the Canadiens.Well no he isn’t on the team and never was, he’s in the organization as a drafted player… they also would not be moving him “just because,” they’d be moving a package of players/prospects/picks for a player they liked more, while also shedding salary (also ensuring they’d be bad for the Bedard sweepstakes) and moving a potential distraction and a sore point for the organization.
They could spin it as a win and talk about the tremendous strides he’s (Mailloux) made to improve but how this was too much of an opportunity to pass up. Columbus gets a haul for their pick, to add to their prospect pool and a second line center.
And if you’re unable to see my point, but spend the entire first paragraph of your post responding, I’m not sure you’re being honest.
I doubt Arizona bites on this. Makes no sense unless our pick is unprotected.Here's an interesting proposal, would you make a trade for Arizona's 3OA for Habs 2023 first Rd pick (lottery protected)
Unless they think picks 3-8 in 2023 are higher quality than the 3OA pick is in 2022I doubt Arizona bites on this. Makes no sense unless our pick is unprotected.
Arizona says no.Here's an interesting proposal, would you make a trade for Arizona's 3OA for Habs 2023 first Rd pick (lottery protected)
A simple no here.I'm sure this has been discussed here earlier, but how would you feel about moving the #1 pick to Columbus for their first round picks, #6 and #12?
Well, thats why i offer CC for Laff straight up. Yet everyone freaks out.I also imagine a lot of those vets will be traded this off-season or by the TDL. Kane isn’t like any player we currently have. He’s one of the best power forwards in the game and very much inline with the team HuGo have said they want to build. Need to replace all the current smurfs with meat to insulate our small skill players like Caufield that we’re building around.
The owner of the most prominent franchise in the league issued a statement that read (in part):
“This decision, made in the context of the draft, turned out to be instantaneously very offensive to many of you, I understand that you expect more from us and we let you down.”
Does that sound like someone who wants a lot of controversy? It reads to me like a guy who didn’t read the room that well originally and would be more than happy to Pontius Pilate himself of the player.
I think most people have moved on from Mailloux’s transgressions. This is a non issue now imo, he’s paid his debt to society and now all that matters is if he is good enough. Teenagers make dumb decisions, this doesn’t have to define who he is for the rest of his life. There is no spotlight anymore. It’s time to move on and see if the kid can play, I think he’s got all kinds of game.As mentioned, he wasn’t drafted by this management group, and from many reports Molson wasn’t happy with the pick (or perhaps the negative publicity and media frenzy that followed). This gives Maillioux a chance to develop his career away from the spotlight, while also righting a perceived (whether correct or not) wrong, and satisfying the needs of both franchises.
Given their production, I’m not surprised why.Well, thats why i offer CC for Laff straight up. Yet everyone freaks out.
Roy would be nice but unless we trade Dvorak he would be wasted as the 4C since Wright will be in the NHL. I’d do it for Hague though since he fills a need too.Interesting discussion on the Arizona board, Vegas is already over the stated cap for next season. 2022 Cap is $82.5m. Vegas's cap hit is already at $83,066667m.
That also means they only have $7.683m available for this off-season including the 10% allowance, and need to sign Hague, Roy & Kolesar, who are RFAs and Reilly Smith, who is UFA. By all accounts, Vegas is trying to keep Smith.
Some on Arizona board want to offer sheet Hague at 4 years, $4.2m. It takes him straight to UFA, and only costs a 2nd round draft pick.
IF Vegas signs Smith prior to July 1st, say at $4.5m and don't make any other moves, they would be unable to match that offer sheet, as matching would put them over the summer limit.
Not sure why Arizona would do that, as they're trying to move Chychrun who is less than a year older than Hague, but it's a good idea.
Wouldn't mind trying something like that for Roy. He had 15g, 39 pts for Vegas this year. He's a really solid player that can play all 3 forward positions.
Would love to trade for him, but no question Vegas as currently financially set, is definitely open to offer sheet with a few players.
Wouldn’t Vegas acquiring Weber give them the space they need?Interesting discussion on the Arizona board, Vegas is already over the stated cap for next season. 2022 Cap is $82.5m. Vegas's cap hit is already at $83,066667m.
That also means they only have $7.683m available for this off-season including the 10% allowance, and need to sign Hague, Roy & Kolesar, who are RFAs and Reilly Smith, who is UFA. By all accounts, Vegas is trying to keep Smith.
Some on Arizona board want to offer sheet Hague at 4 years, $4.2m. It takes him straight to UFA, and only costs a 2nd round draft pick.
IF Vegas signs Smith prior to July 1st, say at $4.5m and don't make any other moves, they would be unable to match that offer sheet, as matching would put them over the summer limit.
Not sure why Arizona would do that, as they're trying to move Chychrun who is less than a year older than Hague, but it's a good idea.
Wouldn't mind trying something like that for Roy. He had 15g, 39 pts for Vegas this year. He's a really solid player that can play all 3 forward positions.
Would love to trade for him, but no question Vegas as currently financially set, is definitely open to offer sheet with a few players.
No, he would just be added to their cap & put them immediately over.Wouldn’t Vegas acquiring Weber give them the space they need?