HF Habs: Trade Proposal Thread #88: 2024-25 Season

Habssince89

trolls to the IL
Sponsor
Apr 14, 2009
9,323
4,863
Vancouver, BC
Depends if HuGo thinks Mailloux will ever have passable defence at the next level. They may not and they aren't the ones who drafted him.
tbh he has great potential but I wouldn't mind if we made a lateral move for a C using him. Just needs to be a quality player coming back. I worry about him being a one-way D
 

Beendair Donedat

You sold a dead bird to a blind kid????
Dec 29, 2010
6,015
7,117
Truth or Consequences, NM
Jiricek for Mailloux straight up. Does CLB say no? Do we?
We do.

Molson took all the heat that went along with drafting Mailloux, and Hughes made it a personal mission to ensure he met and exceeded all the expectations that the organization had for him before even contemplating negotiations on a ELC contract.

Mailloux missed a ton of time in his development stage before being tossed into a full season of AHL hockey, where he thrived as a rookie. This year, he’s over a PPG (12 games, 13 points) so far. That type of point projection isn’t something you dismiss easily.

Ultimately the two players have put up similar points numbers in their AHL careers but the Habs have a lot more vested into Mailloux at this point, and I feel like he may have the higher ceiling offensively. Defensively he’s still an adventure, but you can teach defense. I see it as two guys going in different directions - Jiricek seems to have dropped substantially from where he was expected to be, while Mailloux is improving.

Just my 0.02$
 

themilosh

Registered User
Sponsor
Apr 27, 2015
3,234
2,718
Oakville, ON
Just goes to show the level of parity in the NHL, playoffs are no longer a given for any team and there are no powerhouse teams..
I think it's more like 5 powerhouse teams, 7 very weak teams and 20 total tossups.

We do.

Molson took all the heat that went along with drafting Mailloux, and Hughes made it a personal mission to ensure he met and exceeded all the expectations that the organization had for him before even contemplating negotiations on a ELC contract.

Mailloux missed a ton of time in his development stage before being tossed into a full season of AHL hockey, where he thrived as a rookie. This year, he’s over a PPG (12 games, 13 points) so far. That type of point projection isn’t something you dismiss easily.

Ultimately the two players have put up similar points numbers in their AHL careers but the Habs have a lot more vested into Mailloux at this point, and I feel like he may have the higher ceiling offensively. Defensively he’s still an adventure, but you can teach defense. I see it as two guys going in different directions - Jiricek seems to have dropped substantially from where he was expected to be, while Mailloux is improving.

Just my 0.02$
Which is why it would be a fair trade.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vokiel and ReHabs

HuGort

Registered User
Jun 15, 2012
21,752
10,735
Nova Scotia
No idea why we suddenly “need” David Jiricek, and why we’d ever entertain moving a top notch prospect in Owen Beck?

For a guy who can’t crack the Columbus Blue Jackets starting rotation. They ain’t exactly the 1970s Habs with the big 3 back there.

Owen Beck is a winner. All he does is win. Everywhere he goes. He’s loved by all of his coaches, his teammates. He’s incredibly intelligent (on and off the ice), he wins draws like a machine, and he plays with a mean streak that can cross the line. He can kill penalties, and using his elite speed he will always be a threat shorthanded. Strong defensive game overshadows the fact that he has a vicious and accurate shot. He reminds me of a similar cerebral player from Peterborough, who wore the captain’s “C” for many years and has his number in the rafters.

In short, he’s everything you’d want in a third line center. You don’t give up on guys like that, he’s the gritty/talented type of player that we need MORE of, not less, and in this case you’d be trading a sure fire NHL player for some magic beans. I’m shocked that some folks would even consider it if I’m being honest.
I would stay away from Jiricek. He was recent 6th overall pick and now he's for sale? Definitely something wrong with him.

History shows these deals rarely workout. Drouin, Dach, Newhook, Barron. Skilled but have issues. It's a bad policy to have. All you doing is giving up first round picks for somebody else's junk.
 

vokiel

#DanzeMolsonMix
Jan 31, 2007
18,721
4,274
Montréal
I think they trade RHP to CGY for Pelletier before the end of his conditioning stint. Makes sense?

Or straight after, depending on the rules for stints.
 

morhilane

Registered User
Feb 28, 2021
9,048
11,704
I see the Penguins got Tomasino for a 4th round pick I think I would have beat that he can't possibly be worse that what we have
Tomasino is not an upgrade on anything the Habs have. He only played half the Preds games on the 4th line (~11m TOI) on a team doing worst than the Habs.

He's just another reclamation project.
 

Bell Centre Hotdog

Registered User
Aug 3, 2009
6,817
766
What's the point?

I'd want to add Jiricek, not swap out Mailloux.
I’m of the mindset to keep our guys in all honesty.

The only think with acquiring Jiricek, is that if Mailloux our Reinbacher don’t go back the other way is that the right side though it would potentially be fully loaded would have one of them possibly playing the 3rd pair.

Guhle Reinbacher
Hutson Jiricek
Matheson Mailloux
Xhekaj Barron

That’s if they go pick and a different prospect or piece. Personally I like the production both Mailloux and Reinbacher have had at the AHL and feel like Mailloux can work and be taught more of the defensive size. Offense is harder to teach and is one of those things you have it or you don’t. Mailloux has an offensive touch and has size.

Jiricek in the AHL has looked good too. Personally it feels like keeping your homegrown talent over similar production in the AHL from a different talent which some look at the prospect be from greener pastures.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 417

morhilane

Registered User
Feb 28, 2021
9,048
11,704
So Jiricek haven't been traded yet. I guess that goes into Friedman's "95% chance he comes to MTL", "Markstrom has been traded" (actually traded 3 months later) and "Necas is getting traded this next week" pile.
 

vokiel

#DanzeMolsonMix
Jan 31, 2007
18,721
4,274
Montréal
So Jiricek haven't been traded yet. I guess that goes into Friedman's "95% chance he comes to MTL", "Markstrom has been traded" (actually traded 3 months later) and "Necas is getting traded this next week" pile.
Someone said 48 hours, Servalli? So we can call bullshit tomorrow evening.
 

morhilane

Registered User
Feb 28, 2021
9,048
11,704
Would you trade Dach for Zegras ?
Stop it with Zegras. Habs don't need another small soft unidimensional forward.

Someone said 48 hours, Servalli? So we can call bullshit tomorrow evening.
Looking at things, I thought it was Friedman who said the "tonight", but it's Seravalli it seems and it was also Seravalli who then moved to 24-48 hours.
 

Draft

Registered User
Jan 23, 2013
8,615
5,479
I think they trade RHP to CGY for Pelletier before the end of his conditioning stint. Makes sense?

Or straight after, depending on the rules for stints.

I’m not opposed to it but I’m not sure why either team makes this move. What’s your thought process? Just fresh starts for similar players?
 

vokiel

#DanzeMolsonMix
Jan 31, 2007
18,721
4,274
Montréal
Would you trade Dach for Zegras ?
No point in doing so since they both suck, Dach's RFA contract is more manageable, so no.

I’m not opposed to it but I’m not sure why either team makes this move. What’s your thought process? Just fresh starts for similar players?
Correct, a trade for the players more than for the teams. Pelletier cleared waivers already so he can join Laval straight. RHP gets a short stint on CGY's roster before hitting the waivers himself.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad