Claim Trouba off waivers... Trade Matheson to NY for Kakko
Laine had a 8.7 mil price tag for one more year and Habs bit. Trouba has a 8 mil price tag for one more year.Jacob Trouba has been bad...Habs claiming his full salary?
Sorry, I don't see it.
Jacob Trouba has been bad...Habs claiming his full salary?
Sorry, I don't see it.
Good news! You wouldn't be taking him on, the Habs wouldTroubas not a good player and I’m not taking him on for free. He’d be an upgrade over Struble/Barron but we still need to get paid. But wasn’t it reported that the Rangers don’t want to deal with us because of Gorton?
Totally different situations.Laine had a 8.7 mil price tag for one more year and Habs bit. Trouba has a 8 mil price tag for one more year.
Matheson is an upgrade and it only costs the Rangers Kakko to upgrade AND cut costs ?Claim Trouba off waivers... Trade Matheson to NY for Kakko
That's the key...if you told me the Habs might be interested in trading with the Rangers to acquire Trouba?I'd also be surprised if Montreal is in on this. I can believe they looked into it, but probably not as interested as other teams.
But, it wouldn't be the first time HuGo do something unexpected. They took Monahan off CGY's hands full salary when rumors were saying Flames wanted to get him off their cap. They also traded for Laine when he asked for a trade. We didn't think Montreal would be the team that pulls these moves off.
Of course, they got compensated in those deals. However, we can still be surprised by them when we think they're not involved in anything.
The waivers is likely a threat if he doesn't waive his ntc to move to a team on it.Totally different situations.
Patrik Laine was only available because he wanted out, not to mention the fact he was going through personal issues lowered his cost of acquisition.
Additionally, the Habs were essentially paid to take on his contract.
There is no such incentive with Trouba in a waiver claim.
yeah agreed., seems like that's what's happening here.The waivers is likely a threat if he doesn't waive his ntc to move to a team on it.
That's the key...if you told me the Habs might be interested in trading with the Rangers to acquire Trouba?
Yeah I could see that because I know HuGO would squeeze something out of the Rangers to take on that salary.
But a straight waiver claim for a guy making 8M this year and next?
I don't see it.
So because it’s not my money I should want my favourite team to give up assets or take on a terrible contract without compensation? Makes sense.Good news! You wouldn't be taking him on, the Habs would
Its exactly what they did already with Goodrow.I heard on French radio this morning that there're one report that says that Rangers might have a back door deal with a team to claim Trouba off waivers and then the two teams will pull of a separate trade to probably compensate the team who will claim Trouba.
I didn't catch if the radio host was relaying info he saw pass through or if he was only suggesting something.
no need for Kakko. But target a C, and I'm ok with the idea.Claim Trouba off waivers... Trade Matheson to NY for Kakko
not a chance with that contractJacob Trouba has been bad...Habs claiming his full salary?
Sorry, I don't see it.
I bet LATrouba is not coming to Montreal. American who's wife is a doctor and wanted to go out west. Montreal is the literal last place he'd want to go.
Apparently, CBJ's are the team interested in him and working on a deal.
Its exactly what they did already with Goodrow.
No, the way people talk as if it's their money or their team, is the weird thing.So because it’s not my money I should want my favourite team to give up assets or take on a terrible contract without compensation? Makes sense.
Matheson is an upgrade on who? Trouba? How?Matheson is an upgrade and it only costs the Rangers Kakko to upgrade AND cut costs ?
I know they placed Goodrow on waivers and Sharks claimed him. But did Sharks and Rangers have a second deal for compensation?