GrandmaCookie
Registered User
- Feb 10, 2019
- 2,538
- 2,992
But those are precisely the types of posters I'm talking about. Those who dream of us doing this and then get pissed when Joel Armia scores a goal.
So why'd you bother replying?
I replied to this; Can't see how that correlates with Chicago acquiring Khabibulin.I'd argue that yes, there are certainly many posters here who have spent so much time on HF and talking about drafts that they get a bigger kick out of tanking than they would out of victories. For a significant amount of posters it seems like prospect talk is the driving factor of their fandom, not the actual club.
Most poster who are in favor of tanking on these board advocate unloading contract of mid-level veterans (in a context where the team is already bad) to aquire more drafting capital, and indirectly this equates to a worst team which translate to higher pick. Of course they will cheer for losses in that time frame: the end goal is better draft pick. The whole point of tanking is to draft high in the future. No one cheers for losses for the hell of it.
Further more, when the team is on the lower ranks of the standing and far from the realm of being a championship contender; ofc fans will have a particular interest for prospect and future since they should be the building block of a better future. No one wants to trade their performing vets when they are competing for division title and the Stanley Cup.
Last edited: