I can't speak for others, but for me it is not that Barron is bad, it is that he fail to address a need. Like you said, there are a lot of other D that can bring what he does and sometimes better then he can. So to quote MSL "what chair does he fill??". To me, once Hutson, Guhle, Reinbacher and Mailloux have reached a higher level of maturity in their game, they should provide a better round up performance then Barron... that say, once you add Xhekaj, you are left with a need for a physical/defensive RD.
So all that to say, that I'm ok to trade him because he's redundant in the "big plan", and well... isn't what we always say... trade from a position of strength to shore up a weaker position??
