Around the League - 2024-2025

Fogelhund

Registered User
Sep 15, 2007
23,307
27,442
1731454513452.png
 

TheTotalPackage

Registered User
Sep 14, 2006
7,632
5,982
They're both weird and stupid. Who cares what team employs our previous GM.
Why not? Lots of people still like railing on Lou and Babcock many years after the fact (which I have absolutely no issue with).

It's fine to talk about the successes and failures of former players and personnel of the team. It's just as fine in my books to root for or against them, as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: William Johnson

Dekes For Days

Registered User
Sep 24, 2018
21,323
16,010
Why not? Lots of people still like railing on Lou and Babcock many years after the fact (which I have absolutely no issue with).
Discussing a former executive's time with the Leafs/the moves they made/the lasting impacts they had in the correct threads is very different from cluttering up the around the league thread with endless railing against their new team and everything they do. These people have been given free reign to get their irrational hate on everywhere else, but some of us like to keep up to date on NHL matters, and it's exhausting having to wade through 5 pages of the same old nonsense every time Pittsburgh plays a game.
 
Last edited:

DarkKnight

Professional Amateur
Jan 17, 2017
33,797
53,431
Imagine the people who droned on about Lou and Marleau for years advocating we move on from Dubas talk. Incredible lack of self awareness.

Listening to a Pens watcher yesterday. Karlsson is a tire fire on defence, that contract is untradeable. Everyone saw the Pens were in decline, their window was closing. Why Dubas went all in that off season, a combination of hubris and bad instincts, which will now cost them. Jarry was also another goalie blunder, which has become his mo, brutal long term deal.

Also a third rounder in three years is a pretty sad return on Eller.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Artemi Panarin

uncleben

Global Moderator
Dec 4, 2008
14,874
9,943
Acton, Ontario
Listening to a Pens watcher yesterday. Karlsson is a tire fire on defence, that contract is untradeable. Everyone saw the Pens were in decline, their window was closing. Why Dubas went all in that off season, a combination of hubris and bad instincts, which will now cost them. Jarry was also another goalie blunder, which has become his mo, brutal long term deal.

Also a third rounder in three years is a pretty sad return on Eller.
I've said it before, I'll say it again, Pens ownership wouldn't have let any GM or POHO walk in gut the Crosby-led Pens without trying to give it one more push.

God, Dubas really does suck with goalies though, eh? :laugh:



The thing that perks my ears is the comment about that pick, though. A 3rd and 5th for Eller is a fine return, really.
But there seems to be more hangup on the 2027 aspect.
I get "a bird in hand..." etc., but a 3rd in 2027 is still a 3rd. Like, come 2027, the team nor fans will care where it came from, just that they have an extra pick now. Pushing it out also gives you a little more time figure out what you want to do. You can still flip it and buy, if the team finds themselves in that position. Or if the team goes for a full-on rebuild, you often want to spread out the picks anyway, so you don't have all your prospects come in at once, and they have 10 picks next year already.

Idk... more of a general question, I guess, not even necessarily about this Pittsburgh trade. There just seems to be more dislike for deferred picks than they kind of call for.
 

DarkKnight

Professional Amateur
Jan 17, 2017
33,797
53,431
I've said it before, I'll say it again, Pens ownership wouldn't have let any GM or POHO walk in gut the Crosby-led Pens without trying to give it one more push.

God, Dubas really does suck with goalies though, eh? :laugh:



The thing that perks my ears is the comment about that pick, though. A 3rd and 5th for Eller is a fine return, really.
But there seems to be more hangup on the 2027 aspect.
I get "a bird in hand..." etc., but a 3rd in 2027 is still a 3rd. Like, come 2027, the team nor fans will care where it came from, just that they have an extra pick now. Pushing it out also gives you a little more time figure out what you want to do. You can still flip it and buy, if the team finds themselves in that position. Or if the team goes for a full-on rebuild, you often want to spread out the picks anyway, so you don't have all your prospects come in at once, and they have 10 picks next year already.

Idk... more of a general question, I guess, not even necessarily about this Pittsburgh trade. There just seems to be more dislike for deferred picks than they kind of call for.
Realistically that pick doesn't play until 2030 or 31. How does that help rebuild? Also nobody thought Karlsson was tradeable, only Dubas and his smartest guy in the room routine thought it a good idea. This deal is going exactly as expected.
 
  • Like
Reactions: William Johnson

Fogelhund

Registered User
Sep 15, 2007
23,307
27,442
Imagine the people who droned on about Lou and Marleau for years advocating we move on from Dubas talk. Incredible lack of self awareness.

Listening to a Pens watcher yesterday. Karlsson is a tire fire on defence, that contract is untradeable. Everyone saw the Pens were in decline, their window was closing. Why Dubas went all in that off season, a combination of hubris and bad instincts, which will now cost them. Jarry was also another goalie blunder, which has become his mo, brutal long term deal.

Also a third rounder in three years is a pretty sad return on Eller.

Dubas went all in, as that is what ownership, and the situation warranted... trying to win something in the last years of Crosby. Rebuilding was never an option for him. It was a bad call taking that job, and he's just brought in the wrong pieces to make it work. Karlsson had just come off 100 points, and a Norris, you would have thought he would have done better offensively in Pittsburgh, but his defense was never good.

Jarry is an interesting one... he's been an ok NHL goalie... ok save percentage, though not great, but decent saves above expected. At least he wasn't paid like Ullmark or anything. His performance this year has been terrible of course, but hard to predict that.

It will be interesting to see how they blow this up, and dismantle it... whether Malkin just goes back to the KHL after this year, or what happens. There is just no way forward for them, and they have a terrible prospect pool. At least they have all of their first round picks still.
 

Dekes For Days

Registered User
Sep 24, 2018
21,323
16,010
The thing that perks my ears is the comment about that pick, though. A 3rd and 5th for Eller is a fine return, really.
But there seems to be more hangup on the 2027 aspect.
I get "a bird in hand..." etc., but a 3rd in 2027 is still a 3rd. Like, come 2027, the team nor fans will care where it came from, just that they have an extra pick now. Pushing it out also gives you a little more time figure out what you want to do. You can still flip it and buy, if the team finds themselves in that position. Or if the team goes for a full-on rebuild, you often want to spread out the picks anyway, so you don't have all your prospects come in at once, and they have 10 picks next year already.
Idk... more of a general question, I guess, not even necessarily about this Pittsburgh trade. There just seems to be more dislike for deferred picks than they kind of call for.
GMs tend to prefer immediate returns so that they can benefit from it, instead of the next guy. Doesn't really make a difference for the team itself, though deferred might actually be better in Pittsburgh's situation.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad