TFP have no insiders....it is a pathetic publication and a long standing joke around here.
Comparing Tanev to Savard is odd as Tanev is universally considered a significantly better player than Savard and yes, I would totally understand Edmonton going after him with a first as he is a significant upgrade over Ceci. Once again, Ceci is factually their 4th best dman as he has averaged over 20 minutes a game for his entire tenure in Edmonton and it has absolutely nothing to do with them pumping his tires.
Ceci's name only comes up because their right side is much weaker than the left and moving Desharnais doesn't clear enough space. I would not be surprised at all to Ce seevci moved because of this but that is very different then the narrative that he is a player that they would love to move on from. They would much rather prefer to have him on their 3rd pairing and bump Desharnais out of the lineup.
To be clear, I have never been a Ceci fan and I do agree that Savard is an upgrade.......just not enough of an upgrade to return Holloway and a 2nd and taking a slightly lesser contract back in Ceci that expires after next season and is easily moved in the off season does not move the needle much. If Edmonton does choose to go after Savard I would bet that my proposal of Savard for Ceci and a conditional 2nd that turns into a 1st if they go to the finals as well as a 2025 4th will be much closer to the final price. I could also see Edmonton coughing up their first if they get desperate and perhaps may be more likely as I am not sure that my proposal would be worth losing Savard over if Edmonton bows out early.....perhaps it should be contingent on them reaching the conference finals?
If Edmonton gives up a significant asset to upgrade Ceci to Savard then that means that other preferable options fell through and they would have panicked themselves into another poor asset management scenario.