CaptainKirk
Registered User
"Suzuki, dude, Richiebottles said you weren't an NHL player. You gonna take that?"There was other NHL players at the draft, Dubois wasn't the only one there.
"Suzuki, dude, Richiebottles said you weren't an NHL player. You gonna take that?"There was other NHL players at the draft, Dubois wasn't the only one there.
The trade would make sense if we can extend him and keep him around at a cap hit we like. My problem with him is:
- Lack of intensity (seems to be getting more consistent)
- Faceoffs - can he learn to win the big draws? This is so important if we want him at C moving forward.
Leclerc, the reporter who broke the story about the Habs pursuing Dubois, added a couple more details on a RadCan podcast:
"In the week of the draft, I know it was a tough negotiation. I was told that the Canadiens offered a consideration of three players to get their hands on Pierre-Luc Dubois. I don't know who the players are, but they want to liquidate salaries."
“Dubois attended the draft. The belief was that his trade would be announced during the draft. When it was announced that the Habs had traded for the 13th OA pick, there were people within Dubois’ entourage who thought that was the missing key piece for the Habs to acquire Dubois. It was believed that the Habs were close to their objective.”
Clearly, one of Leclerc’s sources is within Dubois’ entourage.
Leclerc adds that talks have resumed this week. There may have been a correlation with Hughes postponing his presser.
Pendant le repêchage, l'entourage de Pierre-Luc Dubois a cru qu'il avait été échangé aux Canadiens de Montréal
La saga Pierre-Luc Dubois est incroyable! À chaque étape, nous avons l'impression que les nerfs vont nous lâcher tellement c'estwww.gohabsgo.co
Anderson and Dvorak and YlönenI can’t imagine Winnipeg is easy to negotiate with but on the other hand literally zero players want to play in or for Winnipeg so they better accept that they’re gonna need to trade for NHLers
Anderson+ for Dubois is certainly the core of it
The plus is not Petry. It can be Dadonov but I think it would be maybe something else. Hmm
Look at it from Winnipeg’s POV: they want players who have good attitude and long term. Anderson fits, who else?
Habs need to dump at least 9m in this trade.
Why would a lack of a Petry trade with another team hold this up if it's already 3 players for 1? Surely PLD doesn't make more than these 3 combined. Would it have also included whatever we get back from the Petry deal?
I do that trade in a heart beat which means the Jets would probably hang up real quick. If we can get Dubois without giving a first and a top prospect, I’m all for it but don’t think it’s realistic.I can’t imagine Winnipeg is easy to negotiate with but on the other hand literally zero players want to play in or for Winnipeg so they better accept that they’re gonna need to trade for NHLers
Anderson+ for Dubois is certainly the core of it
The plus is not Petry. It can be Dadonov but I think it would be maybe something else. Hmm
Look at it from Winnipeg’s POV: they want players who have good attitude and long term. Anderson fits, who else?
Habs need to dump at least 9m in this trade.
Edit: Poehling is thrown in there too.
Dubois for Anderson, Poehling, and a capdump [Armia, Hoffman, Drouin, Byron]?
Xx - Suzuki - Caufield
Slafkovsky - Dach - Dadonov
Xx - Dvorak - Gallagher
[spares]
?
If we are going to trade for Dubois, Dach is almost certainly going the other way. So, in that sense, he's simultaneously a backup plan and a facilitator.That's really interesting. Makes me wonder if perhaps Dach ended up being the back-up plan because the Dubois deal didn't work out?
I can’t imagine Winnipeg is easy to negotiate with but on the other hand literally zero players want to play in or for Winnipeg so they better accept that they’re gonna need to trade for NHLers
Anderson+ for Dubois is certainly the core of it
The plus is not Petry. It can be Dadonov but I think it would be maybe something else. Hmm
Look at it from Winnipeg’s POV: they want players who have good attitude and long term. Anderson fits, who else?
Habs need to dump at least 9m in this trade.
Edit: Poehling is thrown in there too.
Dubois for Anderson, Poehling, and a capdump [Armia, Hoffman, Drouin, Byron]?
Xx - Suzuki - Caufield
Slafkovsky - Dach - Dadonov
Xx - Dvorak - Gallagher
[spares]
?
If we are going to trade for Dubois, Dach is almost certainly going the other way. So, in that sense, he's simultaneously a backup plan and a facilitator.
Hughes is starting to reveal that he is the man.That's really interesting. Makes me wonder if perhaps Dach ended up being the back-up plan because the Dubois deal didn't work out?
I do that trade in a heart beat which means the Jets would probably hang up real quick. If we can get Dubois without giving a first and a top prospect, I’m all for it but don’t think it’s realistic.
Hughes is starting to reveal that he is the man.
This was his flex to Peg. He said oh ya? I got a Plan B I don't need you. You need me, you are the one with the player that wants out. Call me when you are done bluffing and want to negotiate in reality.
Dach as plan B means a guy like Dvorak can buh bye lah. Dubois comes in and helps on second line with Dach. Kinda in a similar way that Thornton and Pavelski had a hybrid center role on a line in SJ.
Habs are in good hands with this management team
Not sure that trading for someone dramatically worse in Dach constitutes a flex.
I would and it's pretty certain one of Barron/Mailloux would have to be included, especially if the center the Jets are asking for is Dvorak.Another angle. Dvorak, Mailloux, Kidney and a cap contract to equal $7M in and $7M out. Laugh at it all you want, it's a leverage offer.
Who would move Mailloux and who would not? RD is thin
"Dramatically"
I would and it's pretty certain one of Barron/Mailloux would have to be included, especially if the center the Jets are asking for is Dvorak.
We paid a first and a second for Dvorak so we're not counting him as a first?You're 1st rounders need to be quantified. And no, I'm not trading two 1st rounders. Panthers 1st and Kidney yeah.
I rather not trade futures but Dubois is not some 30+ asset and the Panthers 1st and Kidney are not likely to be as good as Dubois.
I value a younger Dubois with $2M in cap savings.
Dach is coming up. I like it, buys us time. We have zero intentions of making the playoffs this season and Dubois is RFA.Not sure that trading for someone dramatically worse in Dach constitutes a flex.
You're not thinking about leverage. You're thinking this is just some trade where you have to give full value. Think Trouba return. 20th and Pionk. Seems low eh? But that's the narrative cause the Jets don't have leverage.
Who's going to be the team to trade for his 2 RFA rights if it's not the Habs? Try to convince him to sign long term? How did that work out for the Jets? Dubois wants to play for the Habs (Fact) and no other GM is going to offer top value knowing he might be uninspired on their team as well.
They can ask for the Panthers 1st and Guhle all day long. Not happening
I would and it's pretty certain one of Barron/Mailloux would have to be included, especially if the center the Jets are asking for is Dvorak.
Some are saying that Dach was indeed the back-up plan.That's really interesting. Makes me wonder if perhaps Dach ended up being the back-up plan because the Dubois deal didn't work out?