le_sean
Registered User
- Oct 21, 2006
- 41,983
- 45,101
with the end of season, WHL playoffs and Memorial Cup he had I wonder if this would be another case of losing a potentially really good dman again if he is part of any Dubois trade. Any trade would also have to likely include one of the higher paid montreal assests to make room. Whether a Gallagher, Drouin, Hoffmam or whatever.
Nyquist. Who we could trade at the deadline.No idea but Habs would need to take a contract back as CBJ have no cap space.
Or…. some type of a 3-way deal facilitation w Habs to acquire PLD? CBJ do have young prospects I’m sure Jets would like.
They had to make room after re-signing Laine.
Why would we trade for another winger? Great that Seattle gets him as he helps them improve and the Habs can slide further back.Bjorketrand for a used toothpick. Unbelievable how we are cap strapped despite being so bad, he would have been an awesome add.
Not sure how that’s your conclusion from this. It’s further confirmation that he has no intention of staying there long-term.We won’t hear about him for at least a year
He can still be traded after accepting his QO. It just won't be a trade and sign now.
Might be easier to trade now though since the salary is set.He can still be traded after accepting his QO. It just won't be a trade and sign now.
He would easily be our 2nd best winger is young and productive. Look at our defence and goaltending man, we are going to be garbage even if we had McDavid and Draisaitl.Why would we trade for another winger? Great that Seattle gets him as he helps them improve and the Habs can slide further back.
If we had the cap taking Bjorkstrand for basically free would be an absolute slam dunk, he's awesomeWhy would we trade for another winger? Great that Seattle gets him as he helps them improve and the Habs can slide further back.
Yeah just seems like this makes him easier to tradeNot sure how that’s your conclusion from this. It’s further confirmation that he has no intention of staying there long-term.
Its the other way around now any team that trades for him is only guaranteed 1 year of him.Might be easier to trade now though since the salary is set.
It's like the Tkachuk situation though. Every team knows that he won't sign with them so why trade for 1 year of him?Its the other way around now any team that trades for him is only guaranteed 1 year of him.
He’s a RW. He wouldn’t play over Cole and he wouldn’t play over Anderson. Heck he wouldn’t play over Gallagher. It was never a fit even if the Habs had cap space.He would easily be our 2nd best winger is young and productive. Look at our defence and goaltending man, we are going to be garbage even if we had McDavid and Draisaitl.
They'd still hold his RFA rights next summer thoughIts the other way around now any team that trades for him is only guaranteed 1 year of him.
Gallagher’s “value” might somehow be even lower than I had first thought after seeing that Bjorkstrand trade. Jeeeeeez
They wouldn't trade Anderson straight up for DuboisFunnily enough, a Dubois trade would help with our cap for next season. The jets have a lot of cap space.
You include dvorak + one of Anderson/Drouin in the trade. The 2 combined have a 10 M cap hit.
You sign Dubois at 7.5M.
You use the remaining 2.5 M to sign Dach.