BaseballCoach
Registered User
- Dec 15, 2006
- 21,250
- 9,583
It is very, very unlikely that PLD will be a UFA in 2 years. It will almost certainly be 6-7 years.PDL is older than our core and will make a lot more money + you will have to give up 3 asset pick and prospect (which are all younger than PLD or our core)… This will be worst than Toronto signing Tavares because they got him for free has a UFA imagine the leafs without Tavares. The money they had to give out, the moves the had to make to be cap compliant and they were never able to assemble a good enough D core or goalie or dept up front because of it
Our goalie situation is now pretty bad, our defense is even worst yes we have lot of propect but half of them won’t make the NHL and we probably won’t have any legit #1 and most of them might be top 4 at best. And I like a lot of our FW but Suzuki, CC and Slaf everyone else is either unproven, injury risk, not part of the future core and overpaid.
Yes PLD is good yes he fit in but he isn’t the missing piece let assemble the reste of the puzzle and than you make a move, if he really want to come here he will be a UFA in 2 year and sign in MTL.
We can't have everyone the same age. Nothing wrong with PLD being one year older than Suzuki.
As for overpaying to get him, of course we should not, but when people just assume in advance that the cost will not be affordable, that seems to be a wrong approach. I think an actual GM would find out what the cost is and then decide yes or no, if of course he has interest in the player.
There may be merit in your argument that we should focus on a D upgrade first, but if one is not available, there is nothing wrong with adding a different piece, if the cost to value is there.