But this goes back to what you said. If Edmonton isn't looking to move him, then it doesn't matter what a team would "feel comfortable" moving for him. Neither is that reflective of what Leon's actual value is either.
Drai is being discussed here as if he has demanded a trade, on the downslope of his career, and has an anchor of a contract.
It's rather confusing tbh
Right. It's why these topics are usually DOA. Because the implication of this type of deal is the twin delusions of
1) We can trade our one premium asset and get like 4 premium assets for him
2) If the team with the premium asset is talking about moving him, you can trade 4 quarters for $1.50-2.00 because maybe the quarters have the potential to be worth more.
This is why I said Draisaitl really doesn't have a value. He's essentially priceless because the cost to acquire is more than a team can reasonably piece together and the return required by Edmonton to move on from a 100+ point C is simply never going to be offered. It's just like how prospect McDavid as the 1OA had offers of 5-6 premium assets get shot down because he was that damn good. It's why the Lindros trade or the Gretzky trade don't happen if there isn't 15-20M attached to them along with massive boatloads of talent.
This topic was especially bad, as it was an Edmonton fan (or someone proclaiming to be an Edmonton fan, I can never tell), thinking that the problem with Edmonton is somehow a truly elite C being paid less than truly elite C prices is the problem and that they could silver bullet five different holes by trading him and you'd be closer to contending. The issue with that is that Draisaitl plus 4 plugs is going to be worth more than whatever the return would be here. Trading your 100p, early 20s 1C with a contract <$10M is NEVER the answer if you're looking to compete.