Sure. I’m not an advocate of buying for the sake of buying and sacrificing the future. My comment has more to do with the current state and not so distant makeup of the team. I think Chevy sees the reality sand going all in isn’t going to pay the necessary dividends.
I think Chevy must the see the Central for what it is.
Colorado is the best team on paper. But they will get leveraged depth wise with all their star power cashing in. Needing some low value contracts to pay dividends.
Dallas has a good team, and good prospects, able to sign UFAs. The value of the Benn and Seguin contracts will at some point be a true hindrance for this team.
At the bottom Chicago and Arizona are going to be in the tank for the foreseeable future.
So you are stuck in that pack with Minnesota, St. Louis and Nashville.
Nashville has taken moves to rebuild/retool, but with Josi, Mc Donaugh, Forsberg and Duchene still there, it's not going to be a clear tank, rather moving parts.
St. Louis traded at the deadline, for draft capital. But they are not rebuilding team, with all their top 4 d-men signed, and some long term contracts handed out. I expect them to pivot back into contention next year. Their big concern is far can they go with Binnington, I imagine.
Minnesota still has 2 more years of Suter/Parise buyout pain, so they can not operate much out of that threshold. Will be required to bring in young players to contribute. And that's where you look at where Rossi is compared to Perfetti, or somewhat in the same ballpark where Lambos is compared to Heinola. Goaltending could be a real strength of this team though, as Wallstedt develops.
So Chevy is still in the window of contention for the next couple of years. Really depends on how he makes out in trades he is forced to make, who re-signs, and what is available through trade, since free agency has never had any significant impact. Edit: And the development process.