like you have no information on what the Canes offered or if Zona was interested in what we have to offer but you assume everything. That is about knee jerk as it gets.
sounds like you missed the entire Jeannot conversation and is misrepresenting it.
just throw out buzzwords? Ill try incorporating these more to meet your requirements
- Return on investment.
- Synergy.
- Customer journey.
- Deep dive.
- Impact.
- Ballpark.
- Core competency.
- Visibility.
at least your post didnt disappoint for a good laugh,
Must have a very low standard for entertainment and humor then, but more than likely you're not entertained and you feel triggered to score internet points with strangers and pretending otherwise with 15k+ posts as you comment in a trollish way. Not gonna take someone seriously that's
over-invested in defending old rich guys who will never see your posts.
But yes, please continue to lecture in a condescending way from your "pulpit" as you frequently do to other posters. I guess when your standards of "entertainment" are so low, it's fun to act way superior to everyone about stickpuck with your rose colored glasses. However, acting like a blatant troll definitely means you win an internet argument.
Finally, you also have just as much information as the rest of us about what the Canes did or didn't offer. Also, while true that Arizona maybe didn't like Morrow, Ottawa didn't even trade a prospect. Importantly, it's also possible that Carolina didn't want to risk another Meier and come up empty handed and decided to get Ghost who was a more sure thing. Here's another buzzword for you, that's another
variable. Worth wondering if we, or other teams could've beaten a weak offer though. I'm sure you'll enlighten people who wonder if Ottawa's offer could've been beaten with more bullet pointed buzzwords in a more trollish manner.
*insert irony, hypocrite, etc. response*