Voting based on team success. This isn't basketball where one player can win the league basically on their own. It should be who does the most for their team no matter the circumstance.
I know it's been like this for years, but it's still a dumb way to judge an individual MVP award based on something out of their control. Trout's been robbed of two MVP's with the only one where there was precedent for 2nd place was last year.
Brady Anderson went from 16 to 53 (maybe not the best example here though)
But I do agree with zeke 100% here
And it still hasn't happened, since Ortiz's current wRC+ would be the third highest of his career.
And my point isn't that it's happened before, it's that what Bautista did has never happened either. They're both entirely unprecedented.
Interestingly enough, Anderson, who has plenty of PED talk around him, is probably the best comparable for what Bautista did, and Jim Thome, who had little to no steroid talk, is probably the best comparable for Ortiz.
Bautista, Donaldson, Encarnacion, Ortiz, Gomes, Altuve, Youkilis, Anderson, Kent, Posada.......top of my head.
Except for the fact that Anderson never had an ISO above 200 again after that season, and of course, Jose Bautista has never been implicated for PED use. Which again, seems to be the red herring being ignored here.
Speaking purely of out-of-nowhere, relatively late career HR outbursts... um... I could have guessed that was off the top of your head because you obviously didn't look into it much.
Bautista - Age 29: 54 HR, previous career high: 16
Donaldson - Age 27: 24 HR, previous career high: 9 (in half a season)
Encarnacion - Age 29: 42 HR, previous career high: 26
Ortiz - gradual power increase throughout his career... not at all similar.
Gomes - I don't even know which Gomes you're referring to because neither is remotely close to comparable. I'm guessing Yan, who went from 11 to 21?
Altuve - Went from 7 to 15 to 21 (so far). He's 26. Not remotely comparable.
Youkilis - Huge power increase went from 16 to 29 HR. Nope.
Anderson - Great comparison!
Kent - Hit 21 in his first full season. Hit 29 a few years later. Career high of 37. Nope.
Posada - Hi 17 in his first full season. Career high of 30.
Along with Brady Anderson, the two best comparables for a late-20's HR surge are probably Wade Boggs and Jacoby Ellsbury, who both had no power at all for multiple seasons before a big breakout, but they, like Anderson, both showed no more power after that one year.
Bautista's career arc is absolutely unprecedented.
one of those was a half season. as of now it's his 2nd best full season, and might end up the best.
Bautista, Donaldson, Encarnacion, Ortiz, Gomes, Altuve, Youkilis, Anderson, Kent, Posada.......top of my head.
why on earth would you look at only HR?
So Bautista continuing to be good rather than reverting means it probably wasn't steroids?
Regardless, my main argument isn't about everything that Bautista's done throughout his career. It's that, in 2010, when he was having his huge breakout season, it was completely unfair to assume he was using steroids simply because his breakout was so massive and unexpected. I think it's equally unfair to assume Ortiz is using something, even though he was reportedly using something years ago when it wasn't actually against the rules.
What? Right away how are EE and JD the same? Donaldson was a beast since the start of his career. We're talking a guy who went from a career high of 16 homeruns to 54, in the non steroid era no less.
No one in the mainstream media is questioning Ortiz
To be fair, the most accurate way to measure this argument would likely be ISO jump.
That said, no one should doubt what Bautista did is unprecedented. He has the record for biggest home run jump, and the assumption should be that the ISO record is his as well.
I'll actually give someone props if they can name who's record he broke in 2010...no googling allowed .
I bet you they are.
They seem a little embarassed when praising ortiz this year, tbh.
"And Papi has the most HR and 2B of any 40yr old ever.....oh **** he's on drugs"
why on earth would you look at only HR?
Wait, what? No man. This simply boils down to previous confirmed positive test for PED's vs. no previous confirmed positive test for PED's. That's it.
Its a moot point anyway. No one in the mainstream media is questioning Ortiz, and he really sustained no blowback from his positive test in 2003. If Zeke wants to wear the tinfoil, I'm just saying he's not completely out in left field (this time).
that's why he's retiring, because he knows if he keeps at it he'll get suspended
Because that's what people were looking at when they assumed Bautista was using steroids.
Well can look at other things, if you want. Here are the biggest ISO and wRC+ increases over previous career highs:
Bautista - .172, 63
Donaldson - .070, 57 (over his half-season)
Encarnacion - .039, 37
Ortiz - .083, 27
Gomes - .025, 61 (both from his 111 PA debut to his first nearly full season)
Altuve - .065, 35
Youkilis - .092, 22
Anderson - .158, 27
Kent - .037, 25
Posada - .047, 28
I know I keep using this word, but... unprecedented.