A few comments since I was busy at work when this all went down.
Gotta think this in large part a personality issue / influenced by numerous off ice factors. I would imagine that in his exit meeting, "the brass" asked Torts what his plans were to tweak his system for this fall. I also would imagine that Torts responded with, at most "minor tweaks".
His lack of ability to change and evolve was definitely a key issue here, perhaps THE issue. Beyond his overall philosophy this also comes back to game management (and multi-game management throughout a playoff series). Rangers' management clearly wanted to move in a different direction and at best felt Torts could not, at worst thought he would not adapt.
Beyond that though, I think the "they tuned him out" philosophy holds a good bit of truth. I also have little doubt some of Torts' decisions rubbed management the wrong way this year. Kreider's use and demotions/recalls is the most obvious example of coach-management disconnect I can remember seeing in some time. The Hagelin comment . Hank's attitude. Torts' baffling "I didn't have them ready" comment. The Richards endorsement. It all adds up. It has to add up to fire a guy who was a Jack Adams finalist last year.
I get it, and agree with it. It may seem like it at times but I am no Torts' apologist. I can recognize the flaws here. However, I also get pretty frustrated with some of the over-exuberant comments posted.
Let's all keep in mind:
-John Torterella coached the Rangers to their best finish in 15 years.
-The "zero offense" strategy employed by Torts produced the best Ranger offense we've seen in this century, last year at 11th in the league. Nope, not the year Jagr broke the franchise single-season scoring record. The Rangers finished 14th that year.
-Torts is one of TWO coaches to reach the second round of the playoffs in 2012 and 2013.
-Anyone else remember when this team didn't work? Didn't try? I do. And the fear of going back to that keeps me up at night.
All I'm saying is, give the man a little credit. The firing thread reads like every other thread on this board when a major move is made. "The grass is always greener" could not be more relevant to this fanbase.
Yet somehow I am seeing calls to being in Alain Vignault. 40 people actually voted for him. A guy who sure seems to know how to win a Cup. Whose team was 12th in goals per game in this year's playoffs. BETTER STILL,
whose team finished 19th in regular season scoring (HINT the Rangers were 15th). If that isn't Ranger fan logic I don't know what is.