Proposal: TOR-PHI 6 Player Deal Giroux and Nylander the main pieces

Status
Not open for further replies.

Magua

Entirely Palatable Product
Apr 25, 2016
38,674
161,091
Huron of the Lakes
Giroux had a down year this year. The team fought through scoring ineptitude early, Voracek at the same time had a down year, Giroux is heavily depended on as a 2-way player -- not a sheltered scorer -- because he's a terrific one, and he had a bad hip injury which completely nerfed him down the stretch and required surgery. Down years happen, and this one had its reasons.

But reports of his decline are just ridiculous. I guess guys like Tavares are in decline too after his past season. Of course he's exiting his peak years soon, but decline? Please. In the 3 seasons before this one, he finished #10, #3, #13 in scoring on some pretty mediocre teams. He still finished top 20 this year. It's also incredibly disingenuous to say his scoring is declining while ignoring that, concurrently, league scoring is declining.
 

Jray42

Registered User
May 10, 2009
9,195
5,548
Philadelphia
duelling #1 C's, is quite common in the NHL ... look at Sid

No, it is not the same thing.

Dude I get it, you looked at the stats and honestly believe what you are saying, but listen to us when we tell you you are wrong. Quit while you're ahead.
 

Mr Hockey*

Guest
No, it is not the same thing.

Dude I get it, you looked at the stats and honestly believe what you are saying, but listen to us when we tell you you are wrong. Quit while you're ahead.

Just go easy on the overhype of Giroux and trashing the leaf players. I was just being honest. Giroux 3 or 4 years from now at 8 mil is not a fit for the leafs.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Tripod

I hate this team
Aug 12, 2008
79,242
87,028
Nova Scotia

HAHAHAHA....read the Kadri article and you will see this little gem....honestly, I am not joking:

"Because, frankly, Nazem Kadri is an elite #1 NHL centre and a player the Leafs should build around."



On a separate note:

Michael Del Zotto is better than you think.

http://www.broadstreethockey.com/20...s-season-review-michael-del-zotto-report-card

Mason is better than you think:

http://www.nhl.com/stats/player?rep...g&aggregate=1&filter=gamesPlayed,gte,80&pos=G
 
Last edited:

flyersfan018

Registered User
Mar 2, 2011
6,661
1,877
NJ
Just go easy on the overhype of Giroux and trashing the leaf players. I was just being honest. Giroux 3 or 4 years from now at 8 mil is not a fit for the leafs.

You can say he's not a fit, sure. To say he's on the decline because you only look at his points totals is just flat out wrong and really shows your ignorance on the topic.
 

ForSpareParts*

Guest
HAHAHAHA....read the Kadri article and you will see this little gem....honestly, I am not joking:

"Because, frankly, Nazem Kadri is an elite #1 NHL centre and a player the Leafs should build around."



On a separate note:

Michael Del Zotto is better than you think.

http://www.broadstreethockey.com/20...s-season-review-michael-del-zotto-report-card

Mason is better than you think:

http://www.nhl.com/stats/player?rep...g&aggregate=1&filter=gamesPlayed,gte,80&pos=G

If we look at Kadri’s possession numbers, his scoring-chances attempts, his scoring-chance differential, and his shot totals, he has numbers comparable to the best players in the NHL.

:flyers
 

Holymakinaw

Registered User
May 22, 2007
8,637
4,514
Toronto
Leaf fans and Flyers fans are the WORST. Bunch of mouth-breathing, super-biased, arsewipes.

The only thing worse than either of them, is bunches of both of them, together in one thread.

;)
 

Homesick

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 2, 2005
17,114
3,512
Calgary
If we look at Kadri’s possession numbers, his scoring-chances attempts, his scoring-chance differential, and his shot totals, he has numbers comparable to the best players in the NHL.
If we look at the equipment John Scott uses he's also comparable to the best players in the NHL.
 

Tripod

I hate this team
Aug 12, 2008
79,242
87,028
Nova Scotia
If we look at Kadri’s possession numbers, his scoring-chances attempts, his scoring-chance differential, and his shot totals, he has numbers comparable to the best players in the NHL.

:flyers

Lol....if you believe that....you are delusional.

Also.....you do realize that article was written in December right?

He is a 2nd line C. Nothing wrong with that. Only an idiot would say Kadri is an elite #1 C like the writer did. I won't say what a person quoting that article and then defending it is. I want to stay in the thread and not be banned.

But hey, if you think he is an elite #1 C, start a poll. Even your Leaf faithful fans with say hell no he isn't.
 

kb

Registered User
Aug 28, 2009
15,310
21,858
HAHAHAHA....read the Kadri article and you will see this little gem....honestly, I am not joking:

"Because, frankly, Nazem Kadri is an elite #1 NHL centre and a player the Leafs should build around."

I am a Leaf fan and the guy who wrote that article probably did it in Crayola. He is the new breed of "spreadsheet analysts" that doesn't want to be biased in any way by actually watching a game.

And for my money, the true gem in that article is this little beauty:

"But fans want results, and that is understandable. It just isn’t fair."
 

Magua

Entirely Palatable Product
Apr 25, 2016
38,674
161,091
Huron of the Lakes
If we look at Kadri’s possession numbers, his scoring-chances attempts, his scoring-chance differential, and his shot totals, he has numbers comparable to the best players in the NHL.

:flyers

In every analytical category Sean Couturier blows Kadri out of the water, all while seeing drastically harder usage. It's not even close. Sean Couturier is not an elite #1 center either. As much as these matter, scoring matters too. And except for that anomalous lockout year for Kadri, he does not produce at a high enough rate. Is Kadri underrated? Sure. He's a very strong 2C with great underlying stuff. He's much like guys like Perreault and Trochek. And they are not elite #1 centers either.
 

A1LeafNation

Good, is simply not good enough!
Oct 17, 2010
27,825
17,978
Leafs are set up pretty good at center for the next 5 years. No need to trade assets for an 8m center
 

Mr Hockey*

Guest
In every analytical category Sean Couturier blows Kadri out of the water, all while seeing drastically harder usage. It's not even close. Sean Couturier is not an elite #1 center either. As much as these matter, scoring matters too. And except for that anomalous lockout year for Kadri, he does not produce at a high enough rate. Is Kadri underrated? Sure. He's a very strong 2C with great underlying stuff. He's much like guys like Perreault and Trochek. And they are not elite #1 centers either.

They are pretty close in adv stats and Kadri has the more offensive upside.
 

Magua

Entirely Palatable Product
Apr 25, 2016
38,674
161,091
Huron of the Lakes
They are pretty close in adv stats and Kadri has the more offensive upside.

They are not that close in advanced stats, though Kadri is very good no doubt. Couturier has a score/zone adjusted Relative CF% of +5.1% to Kadri's +1.33%. Relative scoring chances for +17.89% to Kadri's +0.89%. Couturier has a relative zone start ratio of -9.10 to Kadri's +1.39. Couturier outperforms him in tougher usage no less. Nazem Kadri is 2 years older as well, so that "offensive upside" thing doesn't fly. They're both ~50 point players probably. At ES, even with their age and usage differences, they score at similar rates over their last few years. They're similar offensively. Not so close elsewhere.
 

Mr Hockey*

Guest
They are not that close in advanced stats, though Kadri is very good no doubt. Couturier has a score/zone adjusted Relative CF% of +5.1% to Kadri's +1.33%. Relative scoring chances for +17.89% to Kadri's +0.89%. Couturier has a relative zone start ratio of -9.10 to Kadri's +1.39. Couturier outperforms him in tougher usage no less. Nazem Kadri is 2 years older as well, so that "offensive upside" thing doesn't fly. They're both ~50 point players probably. At ES, even with their age and usage differences, they score at similar rates over their last few years. They're similar offensively. Not so close elsewhere.

I just did a quick match up of the two on the warrior hero chart. Kadri looks far superior on it. I am too lazy to do any searching right now. Couturier is your #2 center correct?
 

Pablo El Perro

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Oct 10, 2007
26,007
13,885
If Kadri and Couturier compare in anyway then that is great. This is why I included him in the trade. That is why I felt 2 centers (1 mid career and 1 promising) would bring back Giroux, a mid career D, and an average goalie (back-up).

Acknowledging that the offer isn't enough for Giroux, speaking as a fan of neither team, Mason is not an average goalie or back-up.
 

Laveuglette

Le meilleur receveur de passes de tous les temps
Apr 5, 2011
4,334
1,823
Quebec
Well, for that trade to happen, we would have to sign Alexandre Giroux first. WHAT? You mean Claude Giroux?

:shakehead:shakehead:shakehead
 

Mr Hockey*

Guest
If Kadri and Couturier compare in anyway then that is great. This is why I included him in the trade. That is why I felt 2 centers (1 mid career and 1 promising) would bring back Giroux, a mid career D, and an average goalie (back-up).

They compare with the slight edge going Kadri.
 

ForSpareParts*

Guest
Acknowledging that the offer isn't enough for Giroux, speaking as a fan of neither team, Mason is not an average goalie or back-up.

Oh he's elite? I must be mistaken.

04/18/2016 11:07 PM
NEWS
Mason allowed six goals on 27 shots in Monday's Game 3 loss to the Capitals.
 

2020 Cup Champions

Formerly Sila v Kucherove
Nov 26, 2013
14,774
4,404
If Kadri and Couturier compare in anyway then that is great. This is why I included him in the trade. That is why I felt 2 centers (1 mid career and 1 promising) would bring back Giroux, a mid career D, and an average goalie (back-up).

As a fan of neither team, the only way Toronto gets Giroux is something starting with Matthews or Rielly.
 

Starat327

Top .01% OnlyHands
May 8, 2011
38,127
75,349
Philadelphia, Pa
Oh he's elite? I must be mistaken.

04/18/2016 11:07 PM
NEWS
Mason allowed six goals on 27 shots in Monday's Game 3 loss to the Capitals.

After playing something like 20 straight games and being the sole reason the Flyers made the playoffs.

But sure. Use one series to define his careers. Since coming to the flyers, statistically speaking, he's been a top 10-15 goalie playing behind an awful defense.

This thread is toxic.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad