bleedblue94
Registered User
- Jun 8, 2004
- 9,225
- 9,672
out of shape...Man that's brutal. How can you be that lazy 2 shifts into a hockey game?
out of shape...Man that's brutal. How can you be that lazy 2 shifts into a hockey game?
Anaheim makes a lot of sense, and even one of their prospect d for laffy trade could make senseA team out West that plays a heavy game might make sense. Maybe someone like Vegas or Dallas? LA or Minnesota might make some sense too. If his highest score is compete and the other scores are that bad, that clearly says he needs to find success on some teams 3rd line.
How is that fair to trade a 28 goal scorer (basically 30) for someone who scored 19 once & never broke 40 points.Victor olofsson.
Sabres take a rehab project
Rangers get a pp specialist and a scorer
Preseason hockey really doesn’t matter.Nathan's > Sabrett
Fight me. lol
He scored 34 power play goals out of 83. He's not going to get the same powerplay minutes on another team. Pump the brakes, right now they're both terrible players.How is that fair to trade a 28 goal scorer (basically 30) for someone who scored 19 once & never broke 40 points.
I want to trade VO eventually too but with some actual tangible value coming back.
In what world is Laf, who's shown next to nothing, worth even him? Think smaller.
And I used to believe in Laf tbh but I think we've seen enough of him to at least deduce he's not a 1st round pick talent.
BTW: I am aware of the irony of not even trading a former 7th round pick for former 1st overall. Says a lot right there.
You have the Avs 2nd, not your own. I think eventually Montreal will stop being an early pick so I don't know that the following year will be top 40.I'm thinking his value depends on the cap NYR take back.
As a Habs fan, I wouldn't go over our 2nd (still a top 40 pick) and a warm body like Ylönen. That's unlikely to be enough, but I wouldn't go far above that.
If a young RD could be of interest, Barron might be available, too.
Keep the focus on the goals so you don’t have to look at the player as a whole. 12 assists. With 28 goals he must be trying to not get assists. That’s amazing. 10th for forwards in shot share on the Sabres. For that you have to pay $4.75 for one year? That’s bad. Laf you get for 4 more years (?) of team control, that’s where his value is coming from. Laf and VO had about the same points last year but at least you can hope for a little more growth out of Laf. Sabres would add significantly to this trade.How is that fair to trade a 28 goal scorer (basically 30) for someone who scored 19 once & never broke 40 points.
I want to trade VO eventually too but with some actual tangible value coming back.
In what world is Laf, who's shown next to nothing, worth even him? Think smaller.
And I used to believe in Laf tbh but I think we've seen enough of him to at least deduce he's not a 1st round pick talent.
BTW: I am aware of the irony of not even trading a former 7th round pick for former 1st overall. Says a lot right there.
Honestly think something like Lafreniere and Jones for Pinto (and change maybe) is the deal that kind of makes the most logistic sense. Maybe? That at least balances the Rangers better
I figure the Habs will still kind of suck in 2025 so it would still be a high 2nd.He scored 34 power play goals out of 83. He's not going to get the same powerplay minutes on another team. Pump the brakes, right now they're both terrible players.
You have the Avs 2nd, not your own. I think eventually Montreal will stop being an early pick so I don't know that the following year will be top 40.
Ottawa doesn’t do itHonestly think something like Lafreniere and Jones for Pinto (and change maybe) is the deal that kind of makes the most logistic sense. Maybe? That at least balances the Rangers better
I mean, I said and change, send an expiring and/or short term contract over to balance it outHow does that solve Ottawa's cap situation?
I mean, I said and change, send an expiring and/or short term contract over to balance it out
OkKeep the focus on the goals so you don’t have to look at the player as a whole. 12 assists. With 28 goals he must be trying to not get assists. That’s amazing. 10th for forwards in shot share on the Sabres. For that you have to pay $4.75 for one year? That’s bad. Laf you get for 4 more years (?) of team control, that’s where his value is coming from. Laf and VO had about the same points last year but at least you can hope for a little more growth out of Laf. Sabres would add significantly to this trade.
Sabres do it all day.Ok
Laf is seen as a project at this point
Rangers need help on pp
VO not a great passer
He’s a scorer
He likes to play in ozone
When he gets a shot, he takes it
Lots of snipes and one timers
But to be honest, not sure what the Sabres think of Laf and they don’t have a lot of room for forwards. So probably does not make Sense for either team
Rangers and Sabres are not good trade partners anyway
Why would Ottawa move a promising young 2 way center like Pinto for an unspectacular winger who goes completely invisible for weeks at a time?Honestly think something like Lafreniere and Jones for Pinto (and change maybe) is the deal that kind of makes the most logistic sense. Maybe? That at least balances the Rangers better
The Rangers will want the equivalent value of what we gave up for Newhook or more and I don’t think he’s worth that.I'm thinking his value depends on the cap NYR take back.
As a Habs fan, I wouldn't go over our 2nd (still a top 40 pick) and a warm body like Ylönen. That's unlikely to be enough, but I wouldn't go far above that.
If a young RD could be of interest, Barron might be available, too.
Agreed. But 1st overall remains a very alluring pedigree for some.The Rangers will want the equivalent value of what we gave up for Newhook or more and I don’t think he’s worth that.
I mean they traded Zibanejad for BrassardWhy would Ottawa move a promising young 2 way center like Pinto for an unspectacular winger who goes completely invisible for weeks at a time?
Brassard may not have been near anybody's top tier but he was far from unspectacular at the time of trade. Clearly one had more skill and took off, but it's not the same situation.I mean they traded Zibanejad for Brassard
I mean Dach and Newhook are probably the comparable trades.
Dach: Picks #13 + #66
Newhook: Picks #31 + 37
I think you’re looking at a first plus another pick in straight draft value. As underwhelming as he’s been, Laf has still been more productive than the other two and may have some residual value from his pedigree. That said, his larger sample size may also work against his value in that it is more games without the expected breakout (whether completely his fault or not).
Lafreniere: 91 points in 216 games
Dach: 59 points in 152 games
Newhook: 66 points in 159 games
Best guess from me would be a pick in the 15-20 range and then a 2nd/3rd rounder as a sweetener.