Player Discussion Tony DeAngelo: Part III

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I do not understand how people seem to miss that is exactly that simple. Sign your contract, come in and pick up where you left off, get a long term deal that pays you market value. Don't sign your contract and either put yourself behind the 8 ball by being out of shape or miss the whole season and you may not get a contract that is even close to what the Rangers are offering him this year.

I am not angry at him. He has the right to make whatever choice he wants. But just from my perch, someone is giving him very poor advice.

Totally agree. I'm not angry at him either, it's his career. But he and his agent should know that from the Rangers perspective they're probably more invested in Fox and Lundkvist.
 
Torey Krug signed a 1 year deal for 1.4 mil after putting up 40 points in 2013-14. Why? Because that's all the money Boston had to give him at the time.

Is Tony hoping that one of his teammates will get traded so that he can get more money?

He also held out until after training camp and signed on 10/5.

Hasn't caused any issues. He had a good year despite not showing up until then. He signed long term after and has been there for years.
 
$925K might not be fair but it's not exactly a shit sandwich either. Tony has one year of bullshit left to go before he gets arbitration rights. He will get paid but better to go forward and get paid more than to sit out and probably not make as much later. He risks losing the battle to Fox without a fight if he lets him get too far ahead.
 
He also held out until after training camp and signed on 10/5.

Hasn't caused any issues. He had a good year despite not showing up until then. He signed long term after and has been there for years.

And at the end of his holdout, did he get any more money? The Rangers can't give him what they don't have.
 
And at the end of his holdout, did he get any more money? The Rangers can't give him what they don't have.

I'm just saying there was no negative impact from him holding out. Not in terms of his role, production, status with the team, or future contracts.
 
That is providing anyone even wants the headache of having him on the team. What is the return going to even be?

I do not know Gorton on a personal level to know how his personality works, but if I am him and find myself dealing with this BS, screw it. Enjoy missing an entire NHL season as you are trying to get yourself a long term deal, Tony. See how that works for you.
There is no return to be had for trading ADA. Any team can offer him an offer sheet that the Rangers can't match due to cap issues. The only reason that hasn't happened is the fear that the Rangers would target their RFA's in the future. Broken system.
 
It would be more out of character if ADA took his QO with a forced smile and showed up to camp on time and motivated to earn his next contract.

Third organization in three years. 90 games with the Rangers. Holding out of camp for more money.
Yes, not good optics. I’m willing to guess that they sweetened the QO to about 1.1 mil. I wonder who else Brisson represents, I know the name gotta look it up.
 
Yes, not good optics. I’m willing to guess that they sweetened the QO to about 1.1 mil. I wonder who else Brisson represents, I know the name gotta look it up.
Just looked it up, a who’s who, Crosby, Kopitar, Kane, on and on. Only other Ranger is Day. No doubt in my mind they were engineering an offer sheet that didn’t happen (yet). He’s connected. Teams should be wary about doing that to us since we have a ton of $$ coming off the books and entering into a win now mode, ala retribution
 
The Krug situation is probably the best example, and that'd be ~ $1.6M AAV for a one-year deal. We realistically could hit that for Tony, but there's still no issue going to like $1.2-1.4M for him.

Maybe he's holding out so he doesn't have to play with Staal :laugh:

Yes, not good optics. I’m willing to guess that they sweetened the QO to about 1.1 mil. I wonder who else Brisson represents, I know the name gotta look it up.
Here's the list:

Contracts by Agent | Puckpedia
 
  • Like
Reactions: egelband
I personally think Pionk's contract is the problem Tony evaluates himself as a better player than Pionk and wants his money Ada is a very emotional person and I believe if he doesn't get the money he believes he's worth and Brisson
can't convince him to calm down and take what nyr can offer its going to get ugly

Pionk's contract had absolutely nothing to do with ADAs contract. Pionk was eligible for arbitration, ADA was not. If ADA wants to use Pionk's contract as a comparison, he can sign his contract, have a good season and then use it during his arbitration hearing.

Hockey is a business. Players and teams use the CBA to their advantage. ADA has no leverage this year. He can play this situation out in any way he wants, but the reality is he's stuck, now. He wants more leverage next year? Get on the ice and prove he's worth it.
 
If Tony wants to hold out to try to get closer to what he deserves, then that's his prerogative and I don't hold it against him.

I have, however, grown indifferent to the situation. We have so many promising youths in the system, and so much positivity surrounding us. Unfortunately for ADA, his hold out has already been overshadowed by this.

Well said. There's a bunch of prospects aiming to win his time on the ice for themselves. If ADA wants to be part of the equation, then he has to suck it up and get on the ice so he can get noticed.

Clock's ticking.
 
There is no return to be had for trading ADA. Any team can offer him an offer sheet that the Rangers can't match due to cap issues. The only reason that hasn't happened is the fear that the Rangers would target their RFA's in the future. Broken system.

Teams rarely sign any players (except their own holdouts) during training camp/pre-season. ADA might see an offer sheet in October--if some team panics about their lineup--but how often does that happen? I don't know off hand, but bet it's not often.
 
Pionk's contract had absolutely nothing to do with ADAs contract. Pionk was eligible for arbitration, ADA was not. If ADA wants to use Pionk's contract as a comparison, he can sign his contract, have a good season and then use it during his arbitration hearing.

Hockey is a business. Players and teams use the CBA to their advantage. ADA has no leverage this year. He can play this situation out in any way he wants, but the reality is he's stuck, now. He wants more leverage next year? Get on the ice and prove he's worth i

Leverage is in the eye of the beholder. Carolina had no leverage vs. the Rangers but extracted 2 no. 2's for Fox because the Rangers didn't want to wait them out. Somewhat similarily ADA could be the Rangers 2nd best dman this year. Do they really want to screw him out of a few 100K's because he has no place to go. What if he stands on principle and doesn't sign. Lemiuex was in the same (really worse) predicament and the Rangers sweetened the pot by 50K. I suspect the Rangers will give ADA an extra 200K or so to sign.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad