francis246
Registered User
- Nov 16, 2007
- 15,449
- 19,247
there’s still really no reason to think the organization ever wasn’t high on him. That narrative seemed to be born when he was allegedly offered up in the Muzzin deal, and turned down, then the media ran with it and until now had never really stopped with the negativity. The problem is however two fold 1) Muzzin is a damn good player, so being offered in trade for him shouldn’t in any way been seen as a negative for your value and 2) we have zero context to what the parameters of a Liljegren based deal would have looked like or LAs priorities in terms of return.
I didn't hear that it was turned down, I've only heard that Toronto said LA can pick between Durzi and Liljegren and LA chose Durzi. So it's not like they just offered him up. Obviously to get Muzzin they were willing to part ways with him. But like I said in my original post, the organization is clearly happy with how things worked out, they like him. They are using him, so it's all good.
My main thing is I don't view Liljegren as this top tier prospect or untouchable player. I think he's a good player, but nothing earth shattering. but I'd move him in a deal if it made the team better whether thats for a forward or defenseman. That's all. But to some people that's blasphomy