In general I'd hope the thinking Weidl can import to Pittsburgh is you're never too set at your most important positions in this league. Taking a QB isn't necessarily about your starting guy, it's about how your team is in general. I went searching for reactions to the Hurts drafting and I saw PFF frame it as the Eagles' chance of having a top 6 QB went from 20% to 28% and top 12 from 60% to 72%, and how many 2nd round picks give better value than that?
And I like that logic.
But I cannot reiterate enough how little I believe in this team's offence for developing QBs. It's one thing to be a QB factory if you produce good QBs. This team, not so much.
And also most guys don't have the profile for success that Hurts did. The PFF article made the case that Hurts should have been drafted far higher, and was right (this was right after the draft too). Most times the NFL get it right and guys drafted outside the 1st aren't starters. You need to be damn smart and sure you've made the right move... and accept it'll go wrong a lot.
For Weidl to push the case of picking QB like the Eagles did, he
a) Needs a real high ceiling guy there
b) Is effectively de facto arguing for firing Tomlin sooner or later, because you need a QB whisperer, and a QB whisperer is going to be a HC somewhere
So.. skeptical