OT: The Pittsburgher Thread: Steelers need a new ball thrower for the handball game thingy

DanielPlainview

Registered User
Apr 28, 2009
8,909
3,161
I think once you get below 4.5 you get into the zone where read progression development is stunted due to running
 

Night Shift

Registered User
Nov 3, 2014
10,033
4,672
Florida
Impressive considering he played for the Eagles honestly
Honestly it was their defense is what made them a force in the early to mid 90s. Without that Cunningham probably never gets to the playoffs. It went downhill after Mike Tomlin Kotite took over.

He did have that one year wonder in Minnesota though.
 

Buddy Bizarre

Registered User
Jul 9, 2021
6,389
4,564
Randall Cunningham had a 5-7 record in the playoffs, so if he’s the best of this genre…

Case closed.

He also played in a time where the Giants/49ers/Bears ruled the NFC thoroughly. He didn't have many weapons on offense either.
So what he did was impressive. But there aren't many RC's in this world and none of these QB's in this class will approach his success.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Night Shift

Mr Jiggyfly

Registered User
Jan 29, 2004
34,436
19,483
sadly there aren't many on this board that even remembers him ........

He was before my time, but I was a massive football fan as a kid and watched a lot of full NFL games on VHS and he was more in line with being a scrambler than a running QB.

FT was more Elway than Vick, Jackson, Cunningham, etc.

FT never really broke 400 yards. They did play 14 games in fairness, but through most of his career his rushing stats are definitely more aligned with Elway.

Runners like Vick and Jackson broke 1000 yards and Cunningham hit 900 once.

The true runners usually hovered around 600-700+ yards, including Cam Newton.
 

The Old Master

come and take it.
Sep 27, 2004
18,119
5,163
burgh
He was before my time, but I was a massive football fan as a kid and watched a lot of full NFL games on VHS and he was more in line with being a scrambler than a running QB.

FT was more Elway than Vick, Jackson, Cunningham, etc.

FT never really broke 400 yards. They did play 14 games in fairness, but through most of his career his rushing stats are definitely more aligned with Elway.

Runners like Vick and Jackson broke 1000 yards and Cunningham hit 900 once.

The true runners usually hovered around 600-700+ yards, including Cam Newton.
yeah. he didn't run to run, he ran to get more time to throw.
 

Victor Z

Trade me right f**king now!
Sponsor
Apr 10, 2018
1,629
1,619
The Burgh
The discussion of best ever running QBs needs more Fran Tarkenton.
And Bobby Douglass.

You have to be a real dinosaur to remember him, but he was a runner.... who couldn't throw the ball to save his life. Actually he had a great arm, but he had nothing to guide it with.

Put him in a 21st-century dink-'n'-dump offense where all you have do is get the ball 5 yards downfield and hope the receiver breaks some tackles, and even Douglass might have been able to get to 60% completions. Well, maybe 50% anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Double-Shift Lasse

Double-Shift Lasse

Just post better
Dec 22, 2004
34,588
15,829
Exurban Cbus
He was before my time, but I was a massive football fan as a kid and watched a lot of full NFL games on VHS and he was more in line with being a scrambler than a running QB.

FT was more Elway than Vick, Jackson, Cunningham, etc.

FT never really broke 400 yards. They did play 14 games in fairness, but through most of his career his rushing stats are definitely more aligned with Elway.

Runners like Vick and Jackson broke 1000 yards and Cunningham hit 900 once.

The true runners usually hovered around 600-700+ yards, including Cam Newton.
Agree but some context is needed to the raw numbers. Tarkenton retired as the top-rushing QB in career yards.
 

Mr Jiggyfly

Registered User
Jan 29, 2004
34,436
19,483
Agree but some context is needed to the raw numbers. Tarkenton retired as the top-rushing QB in career yards.
Context with stats will always be needed when guys played generations apart.

FT was kind of a freak athlete compared to his peers, but defenses in that era weren’t exactly known for being fast and freakishly athletic.

Just feel it’s only fair to give the nod to the guys who put up way higher rush numbers agt much more athletic defenses.

So best running QB of his era? Ya.

In the discussion for top 4-5 guys all time… nah.
 
Last edited:

Double-Shift Lasse

Just post better
Dec 22, 2004
34,588
15,829
Exurban Cbus
Context with stats will always be needed when guys played generations apart.

FT was kind of a freak athlete compared to his peers, but defenses in that era weren’t exactly known for being fast and freakishly athletic.

Just feel it’s only fair to give the nod to the guys who put up way higher rush numbers agt much more athletic defenses.

So best running QB of his era? Ya.

In the discussion for top 4-5 guys all time… nah.
So the best guys now are the best guys of all-time then, in everything.
 

Al Smith

Registered User
Apr 28, 2012
7,470
4,060
And Bobby Douglass.

You have to be a real dinosaur to remember him, but he was a runner.... who couldn't throw the ball to save his life. Actually he had a great arm, but he had nothing to guide it with.

Put him in a 21st-century dink-'n'-dump offense where all you have do is get the ball 5 yards downfield and hope the receiver breaks some tackles, and even Douglass might have been able to get to 60% completions. Well, maybe 50% anyway.
Bobby Douglass was freaky to watch because he was left-handed and because of his running ability. He was mostly a novelty act of sorts, IIRC. Roger Staubach was also known for his scrambling (Roger the Dodger), but I don't think he actually rushed that often. I'd guess he didn't have nearly the Ru yards of Tarkenton.
 

Mr Jiggyfly

Registered User
Jan 29, 2004
34,436
19,483
Bobby Douglass was freaky to watch because he was left-handed and because of his running ability. He was mostly a novelty act of sorts, IIRC. Roger Staubach was also known for his scrambling (Roger the Dodger), but I don't think he actually rushed that often. I'd guess he didn't have nearly the Ru yards of Tarkenton.
Wasn’t RS in the Navy? Going off memory but he didn’t start in the NFL until he was 27-28 years old.

FT started at 20-21. He played like 18 years vs 10-11 for RS.

Their rushing numbers per season weren’t drastically different from what I recall.
 

Al Smith

Registered User
Apr 28, 2012
7,470
4,060
Wasn’t RS in the Navy? Going off memory but he didn’t start in the NFL until he was 27-28 years old.

FT started at 20-21. He played like 18 years vs 10-11 for RS.

Their rushing numbers per season weren’t drastically different from what I recall.
Yep. He graduated from the Naval Academy and did time in the Navy before starting in the NFL. As a Cowboy of that era, it's hard to give him credit, but he was pretty damn good.
 

Mr Jiggyfly

Registered User
Jan 29, 2004
34,436
19,483
Yep. He graduated from the Naval Academy and did time in the Navy before starting in the NFL. As a Cowboy of that era, it's hard to give him credit, but he was pretty damn good.
He won 2 SB with the Cowboys? Went to four (Steelers lol) and was a SB MVP. So he definitely did well for himself.

More impressive when you think about the late start he got in his career.

How did the Cowboys acquire him? Late round flyer or something? I’ll have to look that up…

Edit: Damn that was an interesting read…

He was a 10th round flyer in ‘64 by the Cowboys.

Served a tour in ‘Nam. Won two SBs. Started a real estate business. Sold his business for $600m 15 years ago.

Is now the wealthiest guy to ever play in the NFL.

That’s almost some Christopher Lee shit right there.
 
Last edited:

Double-Shift Lasse

Just post better
Dec 22, 2004
34,588
15,829
Exurban Cbus
Made it pretty clear I felt they were the best all time at being running QBs.

Any narrative you want to create beyond that is your choice.
Was supposed to be a question. Punctuation issues.

I’m going to draw a distinction between a QB who is best at running vs the best QB for whom running is a significant part of their game.

Vick et Al may have been been QBs who were better at running than Tarkenton, but none of Vick, Cunningham, Young have the combined passing/rushing yards that Tarkenton has just in passing.

When he retired, Tarkenton he’d career records for completions, yards and touchdowns, in addition to being the career rushing yards by QB record holder.

It’s a fruitless ‘debate,’ so I’ll leave it there. Indeed, I wasn’t even making the case for Tarkenton as ‘the best ever’ at anything, merely saying any discussion of all-time running QBs should at least include his name.
 
Last edited:

The Old Master

come and take it.
Sep 27, 2004
18,119
5,163
burgh
Made it pretty clear I felt they were the best all time at being running QBs.

Any narrative you want to create beyond that is your choice.
you also need to take into consideration that there wasn't a "protect the qb" rule back then. if they both played by the same rules there would be a lot less running by the qb's now.
 

Buddy Bizarre

Registered User
Jul 9, 2021
6,389
4,564
The coaching staff and the front office skipped Ohio State‘s pro day to go watch a quarterback. For the last 18 years they were all in Columbus every single time. When Colbert said they would bring in two quarterbacks I’m sure that was a plan and not just a statement. Trubisky is only part one
 
  • Like
Reactions: T1K

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad