DanielPlainview
Registered User
- Apr 28, 2009
- 8,909
- 3,161
I think once you get below 4.5 you get into the zone where read progression development is stunted due to running
Honestly it was their defense is what made them a force in the early to mid 90s. Without that Cunningham probably never gets to the playoffs. It went downhill after Mike Tomlin Kotite took over.Impressive considering he played for the Eagles honestly
Randall Cunningham had a 5-7 record in the playoffs, so if he’s the best of this genre…
Case closed.
sadly there aren't many on this board that even remembers him ........The discussion of best ever running QBs needs more Fran Tarkenton.
sadly there aren't many on this board that even remembers him ........
sadly there aren't many on this board that even remembers him ........
uh, i only know about him from my dad. yeah thats it! thats my story and i'm sticking to it.Yea he was a bit before my time (I was born in '78)
i'm sure there are some clips of him on you tube. if you can look him up it would be worth it.Saw the intro of an episode and That's Incredible and there was Fran as one of the hosts. I never watched that as a kid and forgot he was on it.
i'm sure there are some clips of him on you tube. if you can look him up it would be worth it.
sadly there aren't many on this board that even remembers him ........
yeah. he didn't run to run, he ran to get more time to throw.He was before my time, but I was a massive football fan as a kid and watched a lot of full NFL games on VHS and he was more in line with being a scrambler than a running QB.
FT was more Elway than Vick, Jackson, Cunningham, etc.
FT never really broke 400 yards. They did play 14 games in fairness, but through most of his career his rushing stats are definitely more aligned with Elway.
Runners like Vick and Jackson broke 1000 yards and Cunningham hit 900 once.
The true runners usually hovered around 600-700+ yards, including Cam Newton.
And Bobby Douglass.The discussion of best ever running QBs needs more Fran Tarkenton.
Agree but some context is needed to the raw numbers. Tarkenton retired as the top-rushing QB in career yards.He was before my time, but I was a massive football fan as a kid and watched a lot of full NFL games on VHS and he was more in line with being a scrambler than a running QB.
FT was more Elway than Vick, Jackson, Cunningham, etc.
FT never really broke 400 yards. They did play 14 games in fairness, but through most of his career his rushing stats are definitely more aligned with Elway.
Runners like Vick and Jackson broke 1000 yards and Cunningham hit 900 once.
The true runners usually hovered around 600-700+ yards, including Cam Newton.
Context with stats will always be needed when guys played generations apart.Agree but some context is needed to the raw numbers. Tarkenton retired as the top-rushing QB in career yards.
So the best guys now are the best guys of all-time then, in everything.Context with stats will always be needed when guys played generations apart.
FT was kind of a freak athlete compared to his peers, but defenses in that era weren’t exactly known for being fast and freakishly athletic.
Just feel it’s only fair to give the nod to the guys who put up way higher rush numbers agt much more athletic defenses.
So best running QB of his era? Ya.
In the discussion for top 4-5 guys all time… nah.
I mean thats just kinda how it works.So the best guys now are the best guys of all-time then, in everything.
Bobby Douglass was freaky to watch because he was left-handed and because of his running ability. He was mostly a novelty act of sorts, IIRC. Roger Staubach was also known for his scrambling (Roger the Dodger), but I don't think he actually rushed that often. I'd guess he didn't have nearly the Ru yards of Tarkenton.And Bobby Douglass.
You have to be a real dinosaur to remember him, but he was a runner.... who couldn't throw the ball to save his life. Actually he had a great arm, but he had nothing to guide it with.
Put him in a 21st-century dink-'n'-dump offense where all you have do is get the ball 5 yards downfield and hope the receiver breaks some tackles, and even Douglass might have been able to get to 60% completions. Well, maybe 50% anyway.
Made it pretty clear I felt they were the best all time at being running QBs.So the best guys now are the best guys of all-time then, in everything.
Wasn’t RS in the Navy? Going off memory but he didn’t start in the NFL until he was 27-28 years old.Bobby Douglass was freaky to watch because he was left-handed and because of his running ability. He was mostly a novelty act of sorts, IIRC. Roger Staubach was also known for his scrambling (Roger the Dodger), but I don't think he actually rushed that often. I'd guess he didn't have nearly the Ru yards of Tarkenton.
Yep. He graduated from the Naval Academy and did time in the Navy before starting in the NFL. As a Cowboy of that era, it's hard to give him credit, but he was pretty damn good.Wasn’t RS in the Navy? Going off memory but he didn’t start in the NFL until he was 27-28 years old.
FT started at 20-21. He played like 18 years vs 10-11 for RS.
Their rushing numbers per season weren’t drastically different from what I recall.
He won 2 SB with the Cowboys? Went to four (Steelers lol) and was a SB MVP. So he definitely did well for himself.Yep. He graduated from the Naval Academy and did time in the Navy before starting in the NFL. As a Cowboy of that era, it's hard to give him credit, but he was pretty damn good.
Was supposed to be a question. Punctuation issues.Made it pretty clear I felt they were the best all time at being running QBs.
Any narrative you want to create beyond that is your choice.
you also need to take into consideration that there wasn't a "protect the qb" rule back then. if they both played by the same rules there would be a lot less running by the qb's now.Made it pretty clear I felt they were the best all time at being running QBs.
Any narrative you want to create beyond that is your choice.