Reg szn MVP I don’t care too much about.
I more mean I’d rather be the stable Packers with Rodgers and a real shot of going deep and winning every year than the up and down -now completely listless- Giants. I feel that is worth one less SB over such a long period of time. A lot more overall positive enjoyable seasons on the Packer side of things.
Doesn’t make me a non-“real” fan.
You are talking about casual fans that follow a team because of FF and the teams true fans that follow them and buy team gear, buy season tickets, etc.
A dude in Brooklyn that grew up a Giants fan isn't the same as one who only followed them because Eli Manning was on his fantasy team.
This is a clear distinction between these types of fans.
Packers haven't won a SB in almost a dozen years and Rodgers is starting to hear the 'choker' whispers.
I don't think real Giants fans would be trading their extra Super Bowl for that.
Feel free to ask them if you think otherwise:
forums.hfboards.com
Real fans, not the ones who follow a team for fantasy reasons, aren't going to worry about stats over SBs, no matter how much you want to pretend they do.
They want SBs. So do the coaches. So do the owners.
That's always been the bottom line.
There is a reason why the Steelers goal is to win the SB every year.
I feel like I can solve your problem.
Let's agree on these things:
-The Steelers fans are happier than GB the past several years for having an extra SB. We luckily have built some stellar teams to do it.
-Rodgers is a better QB than Ben. That doesn't slight him, he's still one of the best at the position.
If you just agreed I feel like everyone would leave you alone...instead of trying to post long posts spinning a weird story about SB wins and how nothing else matters to fans and how everyone has comprehension issues.
I don't much partake in fantasy football but I can objectively view non steelers as better individual players than some of ours and still fully enjoy my teams success.
Nah, you still keep foolishly going on about who is better and it was never about that. You made it into that issue, then no matter how many different ways I explained to you it had zilch to do with that, you remained confused.
Instead you kept mindlessly spouting off stats and "Rodgers is better!!!"
Great. Does that remove a Lombardi trophy from the Steelers somehow?
I care that Roth brought more SBs to Pgh, period. I don't much care about his legacy - that's his own thing.
If he gets into the HOF or ppl consider his career better than Rodgers one day - won't be something I much care about.
None of that will take away the two Lombardis.
www.pro-football-reference.com
