would that be called "good coaching"?
Who knew that catering to your roster's strength (world class WR crop) would get you good results?
cc: Tomlin, Mike; Sullivan, Mike
would that be called "good coaching"?
I think his best chance at making a roster is probably just as a ST gunner. Big, can run fast, but doesn’t have the position specific skills to be a starter anymore.Claypool will appear at someone’s training camp in the next year or two as a TE. Possible UFL stint in between.
Depends on your perspective. It's great in college when you have receivers that much better than the DBs they're going against and you only have one read and that guy is almost always open and you get like a hundred possessions in a game. But the scheme didn't call for Fields to throw guys open, or find tight windows, or make his own reads/calls at the line of scrimmage.would that be called "good coaching"?
I think his best chance at making a roster is probably just as a ST gunner. Big, can run fast, but doesn’t have the position specific skills to be a starter anymore.
On a sort of related note, glad to see Martavis Bryant back in the league getting another shot
If Russ starts week 1 (which I expect him to), I can’t imagine him having a longer leash than what Trubisky got in 2022 - 3.5 games.If Fields can ''process'' the game at the needed elite level I have no doubt the preference would be he'd be the guy (factoring age, upside and athleticism). Not that Wilson is a slouch by any means.
I'm not sure however if or when that point will come, but based on feedback from the coaches and beat writers it's rather apparent Fields is closing the gap a bit. Both QB's are dealing with a new organization and system so it's understandable they'll be mishaps and ''growing pains''.
My opinion, our QB room is decidedly better than last year, but again these guys are coming in to a completely different setting.
would that be called "good coaching"?
Who knew that catering to your roster's strength (world class WR crop) would get you good results?
cc: Tomlin, Mike; Sullivan, Mike
Fields certainly had the benefit of an insane WR room at OSU, but I will push back on the “one read” narrative a little bit.Depends on your perspective. It's great in college when you have receivers that much better than the DBs they're going against and you only have one read and that guy is almost always open and you get like a hundred possessions in a game. But the scheme didn't call for Fields to throw guys open, or find tight windows, or make his own reads/calls at the line of scrimmage.
Also the Bills just put Claypool on season ending IR. His career has absolutely cratered since leaving PIT and it would not shock me if he’s out of the league soon.
I’ve just always felt that his WR skills never matched his physical traits (99th percentile height and weight adjusted speed score).Here is exhibit A regarding how you handle (or don't hanlde) newfound fame.
Claypool was a physical freak who seemed to quickly figure out his niche in the league. I honestly thought with a bit of polishing, he could be a bona fide #1 for the Steelers.
Then he was in the lockerroom with a clown like JJSS and decided that his brand was more important than what he put on tape.
Fields certainly had the benefit of an insane WR room at OSU, but I will push back on the “one read” narrative a little bit.
Ben Solak did a breakdown of the 2021 QB class and actually charted the amount of times each QB threw beyond their first read. Fields attempted more passes beyond his first read than any of the other top quarterbacks in the class. Unfortunately this article has been 404’d so I can’t show his work, but there’s snippets and references to it still out there.
I don't think we'll start of with straight losses, in fact I think we'll get off to a quick start. We'll see how the reps are divvied up but you still gotta give Wilson some slight favoritism to get the call week one.If Russ starts week 1 (which I expect him to), I can’t imagine him having a longer leash than what Trubisky got in 2022 - 3.5 games.
Our schedule is so brutal that I don’t think we can afford to not make the change after 3 straight losses or something like that.
that gives you more creditability than most who post here. imoThat's good info. I'm assuming the part we can't read is that Fields indeed threw more often outside his first read. This chart only shows he was more successful at it, not that he did it more.
That said, and I realize I've posted a lot on this topic but maybe I don't have credibility... is what college football I watch is OSU for the mere fact I'm in Columbus. So I don't really have a lot to compare it to. I just always felt like Day was one of those coaches who would physically move his players around in the exact way he wanted them to if he could, like playing a video game. In Day's defense, Stroud seems to have caught on at least in his rookie season at the NFL level.
Fields is a dynamic athlete and a great thrower with a strong an accurate arm. I just have never trusted his ability to do the things required beyond that to be a great pro, and he certainly hasn't been coached up in his career thus far.
Ha! I just meant I don't really have anything to compare it to, because I don't follow CFB other than OSU. (And even that is only by osmosis.)that gives you more creditability than most who post here. imo
That's good info. I'm assuming the part we can't read is that Fields indeed threw more often outside his first read. This chart only shows he was more successful at it, not that he did it more.
Yeah I wish the original article was still out there. It’s when Solak was working for the Draft Network, and one of the unfortunate consequences of todays media landscape is that when someone changes companies, all their work is often just deleted. He’s working for ESPN now so good for him I guess.That's good info. I'm assuming the part we can't read is that Fields indeed threw more often outside his first read. This chart only shows he was more successful at it, not that he did it more.
That said, and I realize I've posted a lot on this topic but maybe I don't have credibility... is what college football I watch is OSU for the mere fact I'm in Columbus. So I don't really have a lot to compare it to. I just always felt like Day was one of those coaches who would physically move his players around in the exact way he wanted them to if he could, like playing a video game. In Day's defense, Stroud seems to have caught on at least in his rookie season at the NFL level.
Fields is a dynamic athlete and a great thrower with a strong an accurate arm. I just have never trusted his ability to do the things required beyond that to be a great pro, and he certainly hasn't been coached up in his career thus far.
Let's get one thing clear... I'm NOT an OSU fan. I just live in Columbus.Yeah I wish the original article was still out there. It’s when Solak was working for the Draft Network, and one of the unfortunate consequences of todays media landscape is that when someone changes companies, all their work is often just deleted. He’s working for ESPN now so good for him I guess.
As an OSU fan you’re probably better equipped to answer this, but when I think of Fields time as a Buckeye back then, I think of the offense as a deep vertical passing attack. Just long developing routes to Olave and co. Granted I haven’t watched all his games, but I think of that CFB semi game against Clemson and TLaw… deep balls galore.
There’s also probably a correlation between the amount of screen passes and first read throws.
There was a great video JT O’Sullivan put out back when Fields was entering the draft. and basically it was this. He had Fields as more refined than Lawrence as a passer but had Qs about the difficulty of he was asked to do IIRCLet's get one thing clear... I'm NOT an OSU fan. I just live in Columbus.
Your recollection is same as mine, that Fields threw down the... field... a lot. He was a great passer, accurate down the seams and to the sidelines. But as I said earlier (and to answer @Peat) I don't recall him being a guy who drove the ball in tight windows. Was it because he didn't have to? Was it because his coach told him not to? I don't know any of that. I just remember thinking that Fields had the physical tools to be successful ion the NFL, but he would have to bet coached up on the stuff that Day schemed out of his hands (head).
Let's get one thing clear... I'm NOT an OSU fan. I just live in Columbus.
Your recollection is same as mine, that Fields threw down the... field... a lot. He was a great passer, accurate down the seams and to the sidelines. But as I said earlier (and to answer @Peat) I don't recall him being a guy who drove the ball in tight windows. Was it because he didn't have to? Was it because his coach told him not to? I don't know any of that. I just remember thinking that Fields had the physical tools to be successful ion the NFL, but he would have to bet coached up on the stuff that Day schemed out of his hands (head).
Yeah I wasn't implying "forcing" but "driving," i.e. making an accurate throw into good coverage and putting it in a place where your receiver can get it. I don't recall that being a thing Fields was doing at Ohio State.Danke.
You don't want your QB to be forcing the ball into tight windows a lot. Usually a sign of a bad co-ordinator imo. But the confidence and ability to make it an option if needed is good.