Peat
Registered User
- Jun 14, 2016
- 31,009
- 26,388
I'm sure being an NFL Insider is a soulless existence but we're talking about someone that has 10 million twitter followers and works for ESPN vs.... 40k and Sportskeeda
I didn't watch the interview but I'm familiar with that podcast and reading the article the stuff he said seems pretty logical to me, that we're one of maybe 2 or 3 teams (ATL) even interested in Fields.
Paraphrasing but when directly asked about him Khan even said in his presser that he wouldn't be doing his job if he didn't explore every avenue to improve the team. So I'm willing to bet they at least talked with Chicago about him.
If CHI wants that Sam Darnold package (2nd, 4th, 6th), I don't think we bite. But that article makes a good point in that if the trade compensation is lower, like a 3rd round pick, the team that acquires him might be less inclined to pick up that 5th year $25 million option.
Either way I just hope this saga is over by the start of free agency in like 10 days.
Size of audience doesn't necessarily equal reliability though. Yohe and Rossi have a bigger platform on The Athletic than Haase at DK or Molinari at PHN, but the latter two are far, far more trustworthy.
Looking it up looks like Pauline is probably as wrong as often as he's right. I don't know what Schefter's record is, but he's tainted by a bunch of what should be straight-up firing offences for a journalist.
That's mostly hypothetical and related to whether we should give credence to DJ rumours (answer - just go with the combine interviews) but insofar as it relates to the QB stuff - I don't regard Khan's statements as adding up to a coherent and truthful picture (unless he thinks Fields is amazing, which is alarming and unlikely) so the question is where is he lying. Which, tbh, I don't see much point in addressing until we get further evidence.
I'd expect it to stretch on though. Feels like no team wants Fields as their first option.