ismelofhockey
Registered User
- Oct 22, 2017
- 806
- 875
Haha not one of these polls has asked people if theyd be more likely or less likely to watch hockey if there was more or less fighting. Common sense stuff. Not sure why you cant see it.
Poll questions:
“Would you watch less hockey if there was more fighting and scrums?”
“Would you watch more hockey if there was more fighting and scrums”
“Would you watch the same amount of hockey if there was more fighting and scrums”
Also, I’m sorry if I dont really value the opinions of the some random non hockey fan canadiens. Their voting history on issues isnt exactly pretty
Ok buddy. There are two kinds of people in this world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
There are polls with all sort of crazy results that don’t align with reality, there can also be a massive bias in the sample of people taking the poll as well as bias built into the questions. I’m a member of Angus Reid forum, I do their surveys because they pay me lol. And I bet this skews it toward being chronically online people and many “NEETs” who will waste time for money as they don’t have any. I bet a much lower % of those people are hockey fans than the general public are.
There are many examples of surveys on Angus Reid that only allow you to agree with one side of an argument it doesn’t even give you the option to choose something else. So they can then claim that all these people support policies that they don’t. I remember a question on a MAID survey where they said if a facility didn’t have any to perform MAID should patients be moved to another facility for MAID or should they be forced to perform MAID, no option to say they shouldn’t receive MAID at all. Then they can run with (X percent of Canadians say they should be forced to perform it & Y percent say they should receive it but at a different clinic) You can only agree with one side of the argument on those “polls”.
Have you ever been to a hockey game? I trust that sample size of 18,000 people who are actually hockey fans and their reactions to fights more than some politically motivated hacks and their “polls”
Like I said, if polling were the only evidence I'd provided, you might have had a point. I only provided polling because LaffyTaffy13 asked for it. Now that I've provided some, he isn't happy because none of the evidence supports his and your position.