Tribute The Official "Fire Tortorella" Thread

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
51,052
22,222
I have long thumped admirably on Boston's transition under Julien.
It's not like Carolina,

Gee, I see where you picked three relatively untalented teams that were elevated by their coaches.
Flyers have struggled under Lavi, Berube, Hextall, AV, Torts.
Hmm. wonder what the common denominator has been?

Couldn't be talent, because I've been told the FO is brilliant at drafting and developing talent.
Must be coaching.

Did notice the schemes that don't work did work when the line was Giroux - Couts - Voracek/TK.
Wonder if that was a coincidence?
 

Hollywood Cannon

I'm Away From My Desk
Jul 17, 2007
88,305
160,654
South Jersey
Gee, I see where you picked three relatively untalented teams that were elevated by their coaches.
Flyers have struggled under Lavi, Berube, Hextall, AV, Torts.
Hmm. wonder what the common denominator has been?

Couldn't be talent, because I've been told the FO is brilliant at drafting and developing talent.
Must be coaching.

Did notice the schemes that don't work did work when the line was Giroux - Couts - Voracek/TK.
Wonder if that was a coincidence?
Wait, what?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Kelmitchell2

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
130,488
171,190
Armored Train
But fine. Let's roll with a team with shitty talent.

The Flyers under Hakstol. Once Knoblauch came in and coached up controlled entries, the Flyers became pretty damned dangerous on the rush. They could dump it in if teams were holding the line, and if teams gave them space to get ready for a dump-in they could carry it in with possession. A sin of AV was that he removed that Plan B, and then later tried to run dump-ins with a single forechecker. (This led to people arguing that the same Flyers players who had been running controlled entries were too slow and bad to do so, thus AV was very smart to not try, despite us having seen thoroughly that they could. hmmm)

Once the Flyers settled into the zone, they had the single plan: feed dmen. And they consequently sucked on the cycle. Sucked horribly. But in the stage of the game where they had more than one plan to rely on? Far better.

Tortorella has a single plan and nothing else. The team would immediately improve if there was another. There is not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Larry44 and renberg

Stop the Madness

Registered User
Nov 27, 2017
887
837
Bad news, I pondered more.


The Flyers' overarching philosophy that spits on the idea of offense is limiting. It takes options off the table. In no sport is it a good idea to limit yourself and remove options.

I watch the Flyers on offense, and how thoroughly smothered they are. They're clearly figured out by a league that's seen them repeatedly. They aren't just individually beaten as players, these individuals have nowhere to go. And Tortorella has given them no Plan B.

I have long thumped admirably on Boston's transition under Julien. The team could chip it in. They could carry it in, too. But they were rarely easily contained by any team, because they had a neat Plan C for when a team was doing a good job stopping both: They passed to the other side of the ice. Like, long-ass borderline stretch pass from near the boards to near the opposite boards. The reasoning was simple: If a team is able to stop us from dumping and chasing, and also leaving no room to carry in, there must be room somewhere, and they bet it was on the other side of the ice. And this simple solution worked well. Sure enough, there was usually more room, and the act of passing across forced teams to open up and create more room as they reacted and shifted. It's not like Carolina, who when you watch them you start noticing they have an array of prepared plays to gain the zone. Or TB, who for multiple years had somehow managed to make the long-mocked stretch transition into a multi-level beast that was hell to stop and seemed to rely on careful timing and spacing of guys of different speeds stretching opponents apart.

Nah. Just the simplest "Well they have covered A, and covered B, so we shall do C until we can do the other things again."

What plan B does Tortorella provide? None. There has been the one plan. No other option. Forget the idea of a 3rd. That's work, and as Tortorella said when hired, he doesn't bother to do that part of the job anymore because he hates talking to players. I wanted to make this thread the second those quotes dropped, but I was patient.

In all honesty I have only started following hockey and the flyers since about 2011 when I moved to South Jersey.


I was unfortunately on the end of the flyers more promising years into the firing of Lavi 4 games into a season.

Trying to understand the game more and more each year and i appreciate these posts the most from more experienced and knowledgeable fans.

Thanks for sharing this.
 
Feb 19, 2003
67,870
25,964
Concord, New Hampshire
Scratching Luchanko in back-to-backs when they are supposedly "evaluating" whether he is NHL ready...is certainly a choice. Torts seems more clueless than ever.
And I knew it was going to happen. Torts pushed for the kid to be on the opening night roster but when the games started he was quick to pull the plug. As I said before the season started it is a pointless exercise.
The kid is obviously not ready but this is Torts just being a asshole. This is example number ten thousand of it
 

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
130,488
171,190
Armored Train
In all honesty I have only started following hockey and the flyers since about 2011 when I moved to South Jersey.


I was unfortunately on the end of the flyers more promising years into the firing of Lavi 4 games into a season.

Trying to understand the game more and more each year and i appreciate these posts the most from more experienced and knowledgeable fans.

Thanks for sharing this.

End stage Lavi is another example of not having a backup plan. He ran a left wing lock then, which he eventually switched to a "weak-side winger lock" in his next job so that it wasn't just one side committing to defense. Go back and watch those torturous games, and because he was trying to emphasize defense at management's order, the way he did that in his system was pretty much committing the left wing as another dman. They became mostly unavailable to work the left side and move up ice. Every Flyers transition ended up dying along the right boards in a slog as a result.

Lots of people like to pretend the system enforced by the coach doesn't matter, but it very much does as it informs what players will do. A bad system will rapidly make a good roster look terrible.

Hartnell excelled in the left wing lock (along with Briere as those two would just swap positions on the back check so his weakness was erased), until it became a muddled confusion because he was supposed to stay behind as late as possible to support the defensive effort to the end, while also supposed to move up ice and the conflict of demands befuddled him. He wasn't a bad player, he was given an impossible task.

I don't know that our players are bad. I do know they're trying to work some impossible tasks without enough alternatives available
 

NYCFlyer

Registered User
Nov 23, 2002
1,396
421
Colorado
End stage Lavi is another example of not having a backup plan. He ran a left wing lock then, which he eventually switched to a "weak-side winger lock" in his next job so that it wasn't just one side committing to defense. Go back and watch those torturous games, and because he was trying to emphasize defense at management's order, the way he did that in his system was pretty much committing the left wing as another dman. They became mostly unavailable to work the left side and move up ice. Every Flyers transition ended up dying along the right boards in a slog as a result.

Lots of people like to pretend the system enforced by the coach doesn't matter, but it very much does as it informs what players will do. A bad system will rapidly make a good roster look terrible.

Hartnell excelled in the left wing lock (along with Briere as those two would just swap positions on the back check so his weakness was erased), until it became a muddled confusion because he was supposed to stay behind as late as possible to support the defensive effort to the end, while also supposed to move up ice and the conflict of demands befuddled him. He wasn't a bad player, he was given an impossible task.

I don't know that our players are bad. I do know they're trying to work some impossible tasks without enough alternatives available
It's ashame your posts come across so biased/angry that your message gets tuned out. I'd say this a simpler way. A good coach uses a system that his players can execute. Players play faster/better because they aren't in their own heads.

Not sure any system can work well with a center group of Frost, Laughton, Cates and Poehling.
 
  • Like
Reactions: deadhead

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
51,052
22,222
From 2014 until now, how many seasons did the Flyers field 2 solid scoring lines and 2 pair of top 4 D-men? Basically 2019.

top 6/top 4
2014-15: G, Voracek, Couts, B Schenn [Read, Simmonds] - Streit [MDZ, AMac, Schultz]
2015-16: G, Voracek, Couts, Simmonds, B Schenn [Raffl] - [MDZ, AMac, Streit, Gudas]
2016-17: G, Voracek, Couts, B Schenn [Simmonds, Raffl] - Provorov [MDZ, Gudas, AMac]
2017-18: G, Voracek, Couts, [Simmonds, Filppula, TK] - Provorov, Ghost [Amac, Manning, Hagg]
2018-19: G, Couts, Voracek, JVR, TK [Simmonds] - Provorov, [Sanheim, Ghost, Gudas, AMac]
2019-20: G, Couts, Voracek, Hayes, JVR, TK, Lindblom - Provorov, Niskanen, Sanheim, Braun [Ghost]
2020-21: G, Couts, Voracek, Hayes, TK, JVR, Farabee - Provorov, Sanheim [Myers, Braun, Ghost]
2021-22: G, Couts, Hayes, TK, Atkinson, Farabee [JVR] - Provorov, Sanheim [Risto, Braun]
2022-23: TK, Hayes, Tippett, Frost, Farabee [Laughton] - Provorov, Sanheim [TDA, York, Risto]
2023-24: TK, Tippett, Frost, Farabee [Foerster, Couts] - Sanheim, York, Walker [Seeler, Risto]
 

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
130,488
171,190
Armored Train
It's ashame your posts come across so biased/angry that your message gets tuned out. I'd say this a simpler way. A good coach uses a system that his players can execute. Players play faster/better because they aren't in their own heads.

Not sure any system can work well with a center group of Frost, Laughton, Cates and Poehling.

There's nothing angry about my posts.

Your exact argument was used in favor of AV largely abandoning controlled entry. "Which of these players can even do that?"

Well, all of them who played with Hakstol, we know that. And if these guys aren't good enough to play basic pro level hockey concepts, then I'm right that management has miserably failed at development and scouting. Not that I think they can be made good, but I strongly doubt that we are looking at this groups ceiling

This isn't angry, just facts. It isn't my fault the facts around how this team is run are bad.


Edit: oh and fully agree on good coaches using players to their strengths. I think Lavi is the last time that was clearly happening? Berube famously used some players badly but as far as brutally safe systems go...I mean, not bad! The meticulous transition made getting up ice difficult, but at least they worked as a unit.
 
Last edited:

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
130,488
171,190
Armored Train
From 2014 until now, how many seasons did the Flyers field 2 solid scoring lines and 2 pair of top 4 D-men? Basically 2019.

top 6/top 4
2014-15: G, Voracek, Couts, B Schenn [Read, Simmonds] - Streit [MDZ, AMac, Schultz]
2015-16: G, Voracek, Couts, Simmonds, B Schenn [Raffl] - [MDZ, AMac, Streit, Gudas]
2016-17: G, Voracek, Couts, B Schenn [Simmonds, Raffl] - Provorov [MDZ, Gudas, AMac]
2017-18: G, Voracek, Couts, [Simmonds, Filppula, TK] - Provorov, Ghost [Amac, Manning, Hagg]
2018-19: G, Couts, Voracek, JVR, TK [Simmonds] - Provorov, [Sanheim, Ghost, Gudas, AMac]
2019-20: G, Couts, Voracek, Hayes, JVR, TK, Lindblom - Provorov, Niskanen, Sanheim, Braun [Ghost]
2020-21: G, Couts, Voracek, Hayes, TK, JVR, Farabee - Provorov, Sanheim [Myers, Braun, Ghost]
2021-22: G, Couts, Hayes, TK, Atkinson, Farabee [JVR] - Provorov, Sanheim [Risto, Braun]
2022-23: TK, Hayes, Tippett, Frost, Farabee [Laughton] - Provorov, Sanheim [TDA, York, Risto]
2023-24: TK, Tippett, Frost, Farabee [Foerster, Couts] - Sanheim, York, Walker [Seeler, Risto]

Is keeping almost the entire management group responsible for most of that time good or bad
 

renberg

Registered User
Dec 31, 2003
7,249
7,517
Lewes Delaware
forums.hfboards.com
Keep Torts for this season. Find a coach that can get a young rebuilding team on an upwards trajectory
The only problem with canning Torts is what will the geniuses is the FO find to replace him? Probably another Torts clone- Rocky, Lappy, or the like. Would Sullivan or Shaw be any better? I can't see them looking for an innovative replacement.
 

A1LeafNation

Good, is simply not good enough!
Oct 17, 2010
27,825
17,977
The only problem with canning Torts is what will the geniuses is the FO find to replace him? Probably another Torts clone- Rocky, Lappy, or the like. Would Sullivan or Shaw be any better? I can't see them looking for an innovative replacement.
Todd Mclellan?
 

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
51,052
22,222
Torts is going nowhere.
And they've played 8 games. Some young players are struggling.
Too many defensive breakdowns.
They've also had horrendous goalie play.

However, let's not get too excited
xGF% (23), but Boston (25), Winnipeg (26), Vegas (29). SSS

Teams go through funks. Some to start the season, some in mid-season . . .
 

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
51,052
22,222
You're probably right, but the Flyers sure are going somewhere under his tutelage.
Straight to the bottom of the standings.
I doubt it.

They'll figure things out, work around the limitations at the center position, the defense will stabilize when York returns. There's a fair amount of talent on this team, just doesn't fit real well without another top 6 center (move Frost to 3C and they look much better).

They'll probably be up and down all season, sell at the TDL (not much, they don't have veterans on the last year of contracts that most teams covet), finish with 80-85 points, pick 10th to 12th and 42nd to 44.
 

ybnvs

Registered User
Mar 20, 2014
2,253
3,957
I doubt it.

They'll figure things out, work around the limitations at the center position, the defense will stabilize when York returns. There's a fair amount of talent on this team, just doesn't fit real well without another top 6 center (move Frost to 3C and they look much better).

They'll probably be up and down all season, sell at the TDL (not much, they don't have veterans on the last year of contracts that most teams covet), finish with 80-85 points, pick 10th to 12th and 42nd to 44.

To pick in the 10-14th range has always been the Flyers' sexiest wet dream.

If your post is indicative to the way the future unfolds, then... Same as it ever was.

I am f***ing sick of Ground Hog Day, man. Bill Murray actually dies in this movie.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad