Lets assume worst case with Manoah and this whole hissy fit is true and continues for the foreseeable future. What's the end to this story? They Jays let him pout either until he's gotten over it and tries to be a baseball player again or until his 2 years of options runs out. If it's the latter then what? You can't let a pitcher who hasn't even tried to pitch in 2 years be on your MLB roster so you DFA him. Nobody else can do it either so he clears. You outright him to the minors where he continues to pout until he can become a milb free agent in what 4 or 5 years?
Realistically if he ever wants to see a MLB roster again he has to suck it up and try to figure it out in the minors. I would assume by the time next February comes that realization will come to him and he'll be in Spring Training trying to earn a job. I don't think he has any real trade value at this point. It's minimal at best. For what you'd get back I don't think you can let him "win" and move on. He's gotta learn the lesson here I think.
Griffey hit well north of .900 OPS at ages 33 and 35 and was an all-star at 34 and 37.
Moving Springer to a corner position did wonders for his durability - doing the same for Trout may pay dividends as well.
But Trout would be so nice here.....for the 15 games he'd playGriffey was a negative fWAR player every season post-2004 except for 2005. His "All Star" appearances were a joke - he hit for a 116 wRC+ with comically negative defense at 37. He made it in due to popularity, not because he was actually still one of the best players in the league. Even if you want to completely ignore his defensive collapse which killed his fWAR, he had just one season of hitting over 120 wRC+ in his last 7 seasons as a player. In his final 5 seasons he had just one season of over 100 wRC+ hitting.
I'm not suggesting that Trout will collapse as hard as Griffey did, but you need to properly understand that his yearly salary demands that he play at a truly ELITE level to make it worth it - and missing significant portions of the season makes that impossible. Trout is owed $35 mill per year up until 2030 and he has actually already failed to play up to that dollar value in 3 of the past 4 seasons, due to injury. You are talking about a massive risk, because if he is already struggling to break even at $35 mill per season, why would I project that he's actually going to be more healthy as he gets even older?
The Springer example is funny because he is "healthier", and yet his play has actually collapsed regardless. So you aren't really selling anything if Springer is your example lol. Springer already looks like a bad contract.
Me too. Unbelievable they couldn't push a run across.I thought for sure the game was going to end after the Mariners loaded the bases with no outs in the 9th
Angels can still pull through here!
Lol, that trade would create more Dodger fans than Fernando Valenzuela did.If Toronto was willling to eat the entire Trout contract, they could ask for something like Rada, Kochanowicz and Ward with almost certainty that LAA would say yes.
Griffey was a negative fWAR player every season post-2004 except for 2005. His "All Star" appearances were a joke - he hit for a 116 wRC+ with comically negative defense at 37. He made it in due to popularity, not because he was actually still one of the best players in the league. Even if you want to completely ignore his defensive collapse which killed his fWAR, he had just one season of hitting over 120 wRC+ in his last 7 seasons as a player. In his final 5 seasons he had just one season of over 100 wRC+ hitting.
I'm not suggesting that Trout will collapse as hard as Griffey did, but you need to properly understand that his yearly salary demands that he play at a truly ELITE level to make it worth it - and missing significant portions of the season makes that impossible. Trout is owed $35 mill per year up until 2030 and he has actually already failed to play up to that dollar value in 3 of the past 4 seasons, due to injury. You are talking about a massive risk, because if he is already struggling to break even at $35 mill per season, why would I project that he's actually going to be more healthy as he gets even older?
The Springer example is funny because he is "healthier", and yet his play has actually collapsed regardless. So you aren't really selling anything if Springer is your example lol. Springer already looks like a bad contract.
For the lovers of using small, arbitrary sample sizes, isolated metrics, and DRS to measure player value, Kirk has a 127 WRC+ and .812 OPS in the second half of the year to go along with 16 DRS for the season. Forget the rest of the year and he's been an All Star in 2023!
We still need to win.Seattle plays Texas 7 more times? I would say were in a good position.
Double posted for some reasonSeattle plays Texas 7 more times? I would say were in a good position.
He's now tied for 3rd in AL rookie fWARInto the Schneider-Verse
Is Blue Jays rookie Davis Schneider the best hitter in major league baseball history? No. But also, technically, yes.blogs.fangraphs.com