BondraTime
Registered User
The fact that apparently the Sens think they’re in a dog fight for the playoffs tells me we have 1 final dumb Dorion trade to go before he finally vacates his position.
The fact that apparently the Sens think they’re in a dog fight for the playoffs tells me we have 1 final dumb Dorion trade to go before he finally vacates his position.
I'd call these Agent Zub things.Hamonic + Talbot for 6m
When a better job could be done by Gustavsson and some random depth low wage D.
Just Dorion Things.
I for one was fine going into the season with Forsberg as our starter.I think it was a pretty widely held view that we didn't have enough experience in nets with a Forsberg/Gus tandem.
Maybe Pierre knew that he wouldn't be the GM of the Senators next year if the team didn't do well this year? So, maybe he wasn't going to take a chance on Gus and moved him for a vet?I for one was fine going into the season with Forsberg as our starter.
To me, you don't extend Forsberg to the contract we did unless you see him as a potential starter. He's the 40th highest paid goalie in the league, with 6 of the guys ahead of him having played Zero games this year. We either have faith in him to bridge us till one of the prospects were ready and sign that deal, or we don't and we let him walk.
Going out and getting Talbot seemed like we started second guessing ourselves. We should have stuck it out imo since this wasn't a win now year anyways, but I didn't expect Talbot to be this inconsistent.
Sure, Pierre definitely made a short term move, same thing with the DeBrincat trade to a lesser extent.Maybe Pierre knew that he wouldn't be the GM of the Senators next year if the team didn't do well this year? So, maybe he wasn't going to take a chance on Gus and moved him for a vet?
What? Really? Anything else?Was listening to the post game show from last night while grocery shopping today. Aj said that he knew for a fact that Jaques Martin thought he had the head coaching job before Smith was hired by dorion.
Frustrating that they could have and almost did go with a guy who has proven to be effective at doing exactly what this team seems to be lacking under DJ
Was listening to the post game show from last night while grocery shopping today. Aj said that he knew for a fact that Jaques Martin thought he had the head coaching job before Smith was hired by dorion.
Frustrating that they could have and almost did go with a guy who has proven to be effective at doing exactly what this team seems to be lacking under DJ
What? Really? Anything else?
I'd call these Agent Zub things.
Random statements that don't really make much sense.
I think it was a pretty widely held view that we didn't have enough experience in nets with a Forsberg/Gus tandem.
There was cheaper avenue if you were after experienceI'd call these Agent Zub things.
Random statements that don't really make much sense.
I think it was a pretty widely held view that we didn't have enough experience in nets with a Forsberg/Gus tandem.
It’s not actually how he got the job.Would not surprise me. Weak leaders like Dorion like to surround themselves with other weak individuals so their beliefs are not challenged and the people are beholden to them.
Heck it's how Dorion got the job with Melnyk.
Ya Dorion was doing a lot before Murray passed. Murray credited him with orchestrating the Phaneuf deal. Not a big fan of that one, but I remember that part when Murray spoke about it and basically said Dorion handled it.It’s not actually how he got the job.
He was groomed for the position by the previous GM, Brian Murray, (not a weak leader) who promoted him to AGM and then set him on the succession path before he died.
He acted as advisor to him during his final months.
Weren't we grooming T.Murray before Buffalo stole him from us? Then we promoted both Dorion and Randy Lee to AGM (only a few months prior to B.Murrays cancer diagnosis) and there was at least for a little while se uncertainty as to which one would get the GM gig?It’s not actually how he got the job.
He was groomed for the position by the previous GM, Brian Murray, (not a weak leader) who promoted him to AGM and then set him on the succession path before he died.
He acted as advisor to him during his final months.
T.Murray was AGM, and thank god he moved on before BMurr!Weren't we grooming T.Murray before Buffalo stole him from us? Then we promoted both Dorion and Randy Lee to AGM (only a few months prior to B.Murrays cancer diagnosis) and there was at least for a little while se uncertainty as to which one would get the GM gig?
If I remember correctly, when B.Murr was diagnosed, Melnyk told him he'd need to find his replacement, I really don't think Dorion got his job by cosying up to Melnyk, so I'm with you on that. I was just reminiscing I guess...T.Murray was AGM, and thank god he moved on before BMurr!
The finer details are worth discussion, but for the purpose of my post, he was hired and promoted by Murray, and was not a weak ‘yes’ man placement by Melnyk.
Looks like we avoided getting our peepees slapped. Twice.If I remember correctly, when B.Murr was diagnosed, Melnyk told him he'd need to find his replacement, I really don't think Dorion got his job by cosying up to Melnyk, so I'm with you on that. I was just reminiscing I guess...
T.Murr sure screwed things up in Buffalo, but his acquisition of O'Reilly set in motion a trade tree that has really helped the team out today, it's actually pretty wild how good that ended up for them, but man that team had issues while he was there.
Glad we went with Dorion over Lee I guess.
Lol, I mean, this board had people complaining we lost Balcers for nothing, so of course some people would care.
Some people thought we should have gotten a 1st for Brown and we're disappointed we only got a 2nd, there is no world in which no one would care... That's just naive at best.
Now, would the criticisms be fair, maybe, maybe not. Had we held on to him with the intent of flipping him at the deadline, or for a roster player along the way if a hockey deal arose, that would be a perfectly defensible decision, and should he have gotten hurt and been untradable, well thems the brakes. I'd personally have preferred we go that route in a bubble, but there are other factors. Does he want to be here, the human element suggests moving someone who wants out can be preferable even if it seems like a poor decision on paper. Did our budget allow us the flexibility to keep him around till the deadline? Idk. Did we have another trade lined up that required we clear the deck or get assets back in advance only to see the second trade fall through? Who knows.
I'd call these Agent Zub things.
Random statements that don't really make much sense.
I think it was a pretty widely held view that we didn't have enough experience in nets with a Forsberg/Gus tandem.
DBC is our second most skilled player after Stu, and Paul is absolutely not a top 6 player. He’s killing it right now in Tampa, but we have seen him for years.
I don’t see why we would accept non top 6 caliber guys in our top six, but be adamant that we need 4 top 4 caliber dmen in the top 4.
We need both.
Paul is not a top six playmaker, skater, or scorer, he’s a bottom 6 defensive forward who is rarely physical for his size, who has break out games occasionally, and who works hard and has a wicked story of perseverance. He’s earned his shot with Tampa, but we don’t actually need him anymore. We need his spot for Grieg and Crookshank to get a shot.
Brown wanted out, we got a nice pick for him, and we gave what would have been his spot, which was also a reduction in role in a contract year, to Joseph for cheaper.
These moves aren’t ‘plan the parade’ but they are tidy pieces of business to save a bit of money, clear roster spots in the bottom six, while doing right by two good soldiers during the worst of the rebuild.
Dj wants a non top 6 caliber guy on line 1 and 2 thoughDBC is our second most skilled player after Stu, and Paul is absolutely not a top 6 player. He’s killing it right now in Tampa, but we have seen him for years.
I don’t see why we would accept non top 6 caliber guys in our top six, but be adamant that we need 4 top 4 caliber dmen in the top 4.
We need both.
Paul is not a top six playmaker, skater, or scorer, he’s a bottom 6 defensive forward who is rarely physical for his size, who has break out games occasionally, and who works hard and has a wicked story of perseverance. He’s earned his shot with Tampa, but we don’t actually need him anymore. We need his spot for Grieg and Crookshank to get a shot.
Brown wanted out, we got a nice pick for him, and we gave what would have been his spot, which was also a reduction in role in a contract year, to Joseph for cheaper.
These moves aren’t ‘plan the parade’ but they are tidy pieces of business to save a bit of money, clear roster spots in the bottom six, while doing right by two good soldiers during the worst of the rebuild.