Micklebot
Moderator
- Apr 27, 2010
- 57,026
- 34,801
Well, I think Paul was already passed by Formenton seeing as Stü and Formenton had shown chemistry once Stützle went to center.I guess the crux of my argument is that Stützle, Tkachuk, Norris, Giroux and Batherson are talented enough to drive scoring in the top 6, and will be for the next several years (Stützle especially has 40G, 100P+ potential), so having a defence-oriented presence like Paul as the 6th guy wouldn't have been a problem. While Debrincat is a big upgrade offensively on Paul, he wasn't a necessary one.
If we had allocated the $6M (difference between Debrincat's and Paul's salaries) to our D core, we would have been better served.
And that still might happen. With new management, I wouldn't be surprised to see Dbc swapped out for help on D, and a 30-40pt checker brought in to round out the top 6 next year.
I don't think it's realistic to think they had any intention of playing Paul in our top 6 regardless of whether DeBrincat got signed, Formenton situation obviously creates an opportunity but in an ideal world you aren't expect your 30 pts defensive winger will ever step into your second line, Paul really hadn't shown much offense in his game, and certainly not 30 goal potential
What's interesting to me is that you feel we don't need Debrincat's offense, meanwhile we're 2nd last in the league in 5v5 GF (3rd last per 60), and we were 3rd last last year. Offense is absolutely a problem, surpringly we actually have better GA numbers both in terms of GA/60 (6th last) and xGA (18th best).
What would have helped us both offensively and defensively in the top 6 far more than Paul is Norris staying healthy. If you want a defensive conscious on your line, that's ideally going to be your center. Pinto was to green to get it done, I doubt Paul over DeBrincat helps that out. Perhaps a better RHD on the roster would help, but imo our issue at center (thx to the Norris injury) is actually bigger than on D,